Home› Big Brother
Click here to check out Digital Spy's Big Brother section for the latest breaking news, rumours and spoilers.

Channel 5 I salute you!

[Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,046
Forum Member
✭✭✭
in Big Brother #1
To succeed in getting a significant number of people to waste their money on not evicting anyone is perhaps the ultimate business model. This could be a recession beater.

How many other brilliant ways could this principle be put to positive use?

Comments

  • Digital SidDigital Sid Posts: 39,870
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #2
    They didn't waste their money on anything, they got to gift their favourite housemates with immunity, power and a nice surprise.
  • JVSJVS Posts: 12,676
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #3
    Digital Sid wrote: »
    They didn't waste their money on anything,....
    They may not have wasted money but they certainly lost some - all 4 of the nominated HMs were controversial and would have attracted substantial amounts of votes to evict. Who really gave a sh!t who went into a not-so-secret room?
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,046
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #4
    Digital Sid wrote: »
    They didn't waste their money on anything, they got to gift their favourite housemates with immunity, power and a nice surprise.
    Please let me know who these people are if you can. I've got a good line in African water wells. People can just send me the money. In return, they end up back where they started. I like to call it the Hampton Court Project.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,046
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #5
    JVS wrote: »
    They may not have wasted money but they certainly lost some - all 4 of the nominated HMs were controversial and would have attracted substantial amounts of votes to evict. Who really gave a sh!t who went into a not-so-secret room?
    Yes indeedy.:)
  • Digital SidDigital Sid Posts: 39,870
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #6
    JVS wrote: »
    They may not have wasted money but they certainly lost some - all 4 of the nominated HMs were controversial and would have attracted substantial amounts of votes to evict. Who really gave a sh!t who went into a not-so-secret room?
    I'm referring to the viewers.
    billybullshiner wrote: »
    Please let me know who these people are if you can. I've got a good line in African water wells. People can just send me the money. In return, they end up back where they started. I like to call it the Hampton Court Project.
    Fans of Dexter and Gina.
  • jaydashjaydash Posts: 1,461
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #7
    billybullshiner wrote: »
    getting a significant number of people to waste their money on not evicting anyone is perhaps the ultimate business model. How many other brilliant ways could this principle be put to positive use?
    I'll 'not' clean everyone's windows for just £1 per household if anyone's interested? £2 if it's a Town House, and only £5 for a mansion or Stately Home. Sofits and sills included. Bargain.
  • Pretty GreenPretty Green Posts: 1,810
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #8
    The pornographer has obviously learnt a thing or 2 following his dealings with the New York Mob.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,046
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #9
    jaydash wrote: »
    I'll 'not' clean everyone's windows for just £1 per household if anyone's interested? £2 if it's a Town House, and only £5 for a mansion or Stately Home. Sofits and sills included. Bargain.
    Brilliant. You're hired!
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,046
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #10
    Pretty Green wrote: »
    The pornographer has obviously learnt a thing or 2 following his dealings with the New York Mob.
    Yes. Making us an offer we're too moronic to refuse.
  • jaydashjaydash Posts: 1,461
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #11
    billybullshiner wrote: »
    Brilliant. You're hired!
    Billy, I'm in the Removals game and am a bit busy at the moment, you know, asking people to hire a van from U-drive, letting them fill it themselves and then driving to their new gaff to watch them unload it. Exhausting stuff. The windows will have to wait.
  • MySkassMySkass Posts: 893
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #12
    I think this was a win for all involved.

    Channel 5: They got to keep their beloved HMs - let's face it, had anyone been evicted tonight, they would have lost a good HM as the rest are too scared to breathe without an orchestra telling them they're genuine.

    Gina/Dexter Lovers: Their faves remain in the show.

    Dan/Wolfy Haters: One more week of having these people make complete asses of themselves as they think they're loved. Then when Gina/Dexter return, they'll love to watch them squirm.

    Drama Lovers: Can't wait to see what happens when the 2 vocal HMs return and turn the house upside down.

    The voters: They made the right moves by putting the right people in the safe house - imagine if a mute like Callum was in there. He'll spend a week convincing the walls he's a genuine nice guy.

    Dexter/Gina: They remain in the game - ego intact and ready to retaliate against the shit-stains who pretended to be their friends.
Sign In or Register to comment.