Channel 4 - Becoming one of the best Channels?

catchphrasecatchphrase Posts: 22
Forum Member
Just been thinking about it and it keeps improving, love or hate some of the shows, but some of them ae proving big hits in the UK.

Deal or No Deal
Come Dine With Me
Hollyoaks
Grand Designs
Location, Location
Inbetweeners
Alan Carr show
The Simpsons
Shameless

Now like I mentioned, some of you may love or hate them, but all are providing decent ratings for them. Just to think a few years ago C4 was absolute garbish.

Also not to mention they have some hit programmes on E4 too (Glee and Ugly Betty)

I think it's kind of refreshing to see in my view a channel improve as others decline. BBC is an absolute joke in my view.
«13

Comments

  • sugapunksugapunk Posts: 1,040
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The problem is, Channel 4 milks all the progammes you mentioned to literal death.

    C4 has had consistently low ratings over the last year and they really need to turn the channel around in 2011. It needs fresh programmes, fresh faces. I miss the Channel 4 of the 80s and 90s :(
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 514
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I would say so, although out of that list, simpsons is the only one I watch, however, they do have 8 out of 10 cats,and NFL Live which I also watch. So I would say yeah, they seem to have a good range going for them.
  • shedsevenshedseven Posts: 2,618
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Of the shows you list, I would only watch Inbetweeners and Shameless, but the point is still valid in my eyes. Channel 4 has gotten back to what it does best recently, in my view, with some thought provoking programming. Not really a criticism, but I would like to see more HD output on 4HD and E4HD - but that's another thread most probably. I always like Channel 4's outlook to programming, in as much as they like to let the viewer decide what's perceived to be 'right' or 'wrong', 'good' or 'bad' - none of this 'we know best' from them. More power to Channel 4, I say. :)
  • AneechikAneechik Posts: 20,208
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Channel 4 of today is really nothing in comparison to the Channel 4 of the 90s, and its horrific ratings really are testament to that.
  • youngswedeyoungswede Posts: 2,294
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Its the channel i watch the most
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 601
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Don't forget Misfits, a brilliant show that won a BAFTA for Best Drama Series this year. It's shown on E4 ;)
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 514
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The best thing Channel 4 did was to get rid of Big Brother. It appears to be blossoming without that tripe. Even the mornings I watch it. Everybody Loves Raymond, Frasier, That Jim Belushi doo dah. It just offers more variety than the other channels.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 252
    Forum Member
    Yeah, I would say It's the best UK TV channel.

    But then again, you're only comparing it to BBC One, BBC Two, ITV1, Five, Sky1 and a couple hundred repeat channels, so it's the best, but not by a long shot..
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 514
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Paradox295 wrote: »
    Yeah, I would say It's the best UK TV channel.

    But then again, you're only comparing it to BBC One, BBC Two, ITV1, Five, Sky1 and a couple hundred repeat channels, so it's the best, but not by a long shot..

    Actually no, for variety, channel 4 are probably the best for that compared to any other channel on offer. They are offering a bit of everything to appeal to viewers. I cannot think of any other channel that offer what channel 4 are offering. For me its like they are a jack of all trades channel and not a specialist in any given field.
  • Prince MonaluluPrince Monalulu Posts: 35,900
    Forum Member
    Aneechik wrote: »
    The Channel 4 of today is really nothing in comparison to the Channel 4 of the 90s, and its horrific ratings really are testament to that.

    Seconded isn't what it used to be with interesting programming that wouldn't get aired elsewhere.

    Heaven only knows what the OP is on about with that list of programs, Shameless was ruined about 2 series back for a start.
    There's more to a 'good' channel than just putting bums on seats IMO, so I'm not so hung up on ratings.
    Using that reasoning The Sun is actually a newspaper.
  • BlocFFCBlocFFC Posts: 2,338
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Channel 4 is my favourite channel but I think a lot of shows appeal to a limited range and they either get shows that are brilliant or rubbish, none in between.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 245
    Forum Member
    Easily.

    Plus you've got Misfits, Inbetweeners and Peep Show which I love. Plus 4oD is miles better than any other TV channel website I have come across so far.

    If they moved Eastenders, Apprentice and X Factor over to C4 I'd probably not need the other channels!
  • vauxhall1964vauxhall1964 Posts: 10,353
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    If it wasn't for True Blood and Ugly Betty (now over) I'd rarely watch the channel. It's a shadow of its 80s/90s self when it had a clear point to its existence. The Red Riding trilogy though was superb.
  • fhs man 2fhs man 2 Posts: 7,591
    Forum Member
    wash your mouth out with soap
  • ChuckyBlackhartChuckyBlackhart Posts: 2,468
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It's the worst channel.

    Pretentious, overly expensive, overly long idents. You have to suffer through them (and what feels like an age) to get to a programme. They last for ages and all that money spent on them could (should) be spent on, oh I don't know...actual programming!

    Then there is the enevitable 118 ads.:rolleyes: After the three minute long ident you've just suffered through, yes now you've got to suffer those 118 tw*ts. Or some other 'sponser'.

    Then before the programme has even shown it's opening sequence...there's more adverts! Certainly this is true when they showed Lost. I haven't watched anything on the channel since then.

    99% of the channels programming is for snobs. Endless cookery shows / property shows. It has an extremely strange obsession for that fat lipped annoyance Jamie Oliver. And if it's not him it's old folks home escapee Noel Edmonds.

    And the 1% of it's 'youth programming' consists of this smug faced cum bucket basically being smug and thinking he's funny.

    On the one hand the channel is just as bad as any other when it comes to it's output. On the other hand channel 4 is infinitely worse. Because they should know better. They where specifically set up to provide an alternative.

    Since 2001 they have completely, 100% failed to provide an alternative. But despite showing nothing but the most mainstream programming (something channel 4 are not supposed to do) and raking in money from commercials and sponsers (as if there's a difference) they still have the unbelievable nerve to approach the government for money (your money!) under the guise of being a public service broadcaster. You couldn't make it up.

    The people running channel 4 since 2001 have completely obliterated channel 4.

    The real channel 4 never in a million years would have shown Richard and Judy. Or Paul O Grady. It's the new ITV / channel 5.
  • Prince MonaluluPrince Monalulu Posts: 35,900
    Forum Member
    Someone doesn't know how percentages work.

    I actually read all that and it made no more sense on the 3rd attempt than the 1st.
  • StrakerStraker Posts: 79,631
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Just seeing the thread title I thought the OP must be joking. Apparently not.....

    The C4 of today is so far removed from it’s original remit (to provide alternative programming) that it might as well rename itself because it has **** all to do with the channel it began as. Lest we forget this is the same channel that used to put Kenneth Anger films and arts programming on Saturday mornings as oppsed to the teen shite they inflict on the nation now. It chases ratings more assiduously than anyone else, is pandering, sensationalist, cheap and nasty. Were it not for the peerless 7pm News and the True Stories strand it would be entirely dispensible, especially now they’ve gotten rid of The Daily Show on More4. And as to the OP slagging the Beeb whilst praising C4.....BBC4 all on it’s own beats anything C4 do on any given day and just to keep it seasonal, there would have been no Xmas telly this year if the BBC, as usual, hadn’t made the effort and programmed a whole load of specials for the festive period.

    It’s surely no accident that C4 is one digit away from those other shitpeddlers, Five, on the dial - Both cut from the same shabby cloth. In retrospect we should have read more into the fact that their first programme ever on air was some shitty game-show, Countdown.

    Surely this has to be a joke thread????
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 8,681
    Forum Member
    I actually think that Channel 4 has gone downhill these past few years. At the turn of the century, channel 4 was pretty much on a role; they led the way in reality TV (Big Brother, Wife Swap etc.), had some great American imports, the Friday night comedy schedule was strong etc.

    However, these days the reality genre has practically died on it's feet, poor US imports that are quickly bumped off to a graveyard slot, too many niche documentaries, overkill on their few cult hit shows. Basically, the channel doesn't know what it should be and neither does the audience at home.

    Channel 4's ratings have gone through the floor and things won't improve until they start commissioning better, more mainstream programmes that people want to watch. The channel is a mess which is such a shame because I used to watch it a lot, not anymore though.
  • BeethovensPianoBeethovensPiano Posts: 11,689
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Kharhaz wrote: »
    The best thing Channel 4 did was to get rid of Big Brother. It appears to be blossoming without that tripe. Even the mornings I watch it. .

    Blossoming? :eek: Have you seen some of their ratings in the last 4 or 5 months?

    BB gave them 3-4m viewers everynight through the whole summer. I think they will come to regret ditching it.

    Theyve also bought the US version of one of its most popular shows, Shameless. How about spending that money on the UK version or another UK made show? Weird decision.
  • TassiumTassium Posts: 31,639
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    CH4 is falling down a very large well (shaped like a very large 4)

    It's focussed so much on the core audience for it's stupid trash-tastic endlessly shown dimwitted programmes that the general audience has become repelled.

    I like the "Big Fat Quiz of the Year" and I will watch it in Jan, but I will feel dirty in so doing since CH4 has become such a moronville.

    Even stuff with Kirsty and Phil is dim stuff for dimboids.


    And they are to cancel "The Daily Show" on More4 which just says it all about where this network is going.
  • VennegoorVennegoor Posts: 14,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Someone has put up the opening few minutes of the Channel 4 launch on Youtube, that showed a memorable trailer of what could be expected. The channel is not even a shadow of what it was then.

    It still makes the odd gem, but its core offering is some of the most pointless programming in UK television.
  • lozzerbozzerlozzerbozzer Posts: 5,026
    Forum Member
    i like channel 4, i watch most of the shows the OP mentioned and add on to them Hollyoaks plus one born every minute and my big fat gypsy wedding which are back in january, i'll be very happy. But hey, i must be a moron :p
    Gutted they'll be no more BB this summer though :mad:
  • TassiumTassium Posts: 31,639
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It's certainly going for the exact opposite of it's remit in a very big way.

    And in doing so has attracted an all new audience.
  • Glenn AGlenn A Posts: 23,877
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Big Brother was clapped out and swallowing up a fifth of the station's budget. Also it couldn't be repeated, ratings had fallen by two thirds and everyone seemed sick of it, so Channel 4 were right to get rid of it. Should Channel 4 have continued with it, then they would have been left with a very costly flop as at some times ratings were down to 1.5 million.
  • CLL DodgeCLL Dodge Posts: 115,799
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    It was the best channel in the 1980s.

    Barely worth watching now.
Sign In or Register to comment.