Options

Is KH so stupid that she can't

norbitonitenorbitonite Posts: 8,678
Forum Member
differentiate between sadness at someone leaving and sadness at the manner of their leaving?

Comments

  • Options
    ColbenukColbenuk Posts: 878
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    She can, she is just trying wind up her main competition.
    KP has already told her that he is favourite
  • Options
    Sharona68Sharona68 Posts: 1,915
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Of course she can differentiate. She just saw an opportunity to use her new favourite word ......OWN

    Nasty, vile creature.
  • Options
    AA2009AA2009 Posts: 8,378
    Forum Member
    She knew perfectly well what she was doing. She was just trying to make Keith look bad and get her little gang to isolate him.

    Kav and Calum even said it and they're supposed to be her friends.
  • Options
    conchieconchie Posts: 14,052
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Colbenuk wrote: »
    She can, she is just trying wind up her main competition.
    KP has already told her that he is favourite

    This is absolutely IT in a nutshell. It was perfectly clear that the reason Cheggers was upset was the manner of Cami Li's departure and not particularly the fact that she went.

    Hopkins has heard the bell, the final lap is upon her and she is doing her best to trip up and bad mouth the ONE person in the house she knows could be favourite with the public. Her reasoning is if she can cast doubt with the public about lovely Cheggers they will turn against him when it comes to votes. She is fooling no one. Everyone should load their votes onto Cheggers and see a decent man win and take the prize.
  • Options
    sheils1sheils1 Posts: 16,297
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Colbenuk wrote: »
    She can, she is just trying wind up her main competition.
    KP has already told her that he is favourite

    Agree, she really trying to make him look an idiot, but alas, she looks the idiot.
  • Options
    kirstylouise666kirstylouise666 Posts: 6,959
    Forum Member
    She's very manipulative and is trying to take down the main competitors.
  • Options
    FlowesFlowes Posts: 6,986
    Forum Member
    differentiate between sadness at someone leaving and sadness at the manner of their leaving?

    Yes she is that stupid. She has been consistent thought the series in showing us just how stupid she actually is.
  • Options
    mitacondmitacond Posts: 105,727
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    differentiate between sadness at someone leaving and sadness at the manner of their leaving?
    Colbenuk wrote: »
    She can, she is just trying wind up her main competition.
    KP has already told her that he is favourite
    Sharona68 wrote: »
    Of course she can differentiate. She just saw an opportunity to use her new favourite word ......OWN

    Nasty, vile creature.
    AA2009 wrote: »
    She knew perfectly well what she was doing. She was just trying to make Keith look bad and get her little gang to isolate him.

    Kav and Calum even said it and they're supposed to be her friends.

    I agree what a calculating, pompous, pretentious and onery individual ;-):)
  • Options
    AA2009AA2009 Posts: 8,378
    Forum Member
    Onery is a good word! :)
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 949
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Keith was right. Cami had barely been gone a minute and all they cared about was themselves, not even a moment of "ah that's a shame".

    Keith was simply saying it's not fair for someone to have to leave in that way but Katie has to stick her oar in and start shouting her moronic opinion without even listening to what he was saying. Made herself look like an idiot (again)
  • Options
    Miss Con StrueMiss Con Strue Posts: 3,186
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hopkins saw an opportunity to turn on Keith, by blaming him for Cami going, as he nominated her. It seems to have slipped her mind that everyone voted for two people - they have no choice. Even if Keith voted for Cami, it doesn't mean they didn't get on and he was upset by the way she left the house. Hopkins couldn't begin to understand, because she has no sensitivity.
  • Options
    SULLASULLA Posts: 149,789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    differentiate between sadness at someone leaving and sadness at the manner of their leaving?
    She is the thinking person's favourite.
    She's very manipulative and is trying to take down the main competitors.
    But she does it without being offensive or obnoxious. She does not claim that it's the Hopkins Show
  • Options
    Philip_ClarkePhilip_Clarke Posts: 1,967
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sadly in this day,even picking on a national treasure could.make u win
  • Options
    Helsbels46Helsbels46 Posts: 1,324
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    She is wholly loathsome
  • Options
    Reality SucksReality Sucks Posts: 28,538
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Flowes wrote: »
    Yes she is that stupid. She has been consistent thought the series in showing us just how stupid she actually is.

    She thinks she's pointing out other people's flaws, but in doing so she just exposes her own.
  • Options
    MelaxMelax Posts: 896
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Yeah, she is so stupid. So stupid that she was the only housemate that knew Rudyard Kipling's well known poem 'If'. It's the first thing you learn in stupid school.
  • Options
    valdvald Posts: 46,057
    Forum Member
    She's not very bright, that's for sure. Either that or she's got hearing difficulties.
  • Options
    rfonzorfonzo Posts: 11,772
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    conchie wrote: »
    This is absolutely IT in a nutshell. It was perfectly clear that the reason Cheggers was upset was the manner of Cami Li's departure and not particularly the fact that she went.

    Hopkins has heard the bell, the final lap is upon her and she is doing her best to trip up and bad mouth the ONE person in the house she knows could be favourite with the public. Her reasoning is if she can cast doubt with the public about lovely Cheggers they will turn against him when it comes to votes. She is fooling no one. Everyone should load their votes onto Cheggers and see a decent man win and take the prize.
    She's very manipulative and is trying to take down the main competitors.

    This is certainly the case. Everything she does is manipulative. Her work on This Morning and her column is designed to court controversy. The topics of obesity, personal appearance (people with ginger hair) and alcoholism give her the platform to demonstrate some rather harsh views in order for her to face a backlash. It is those responses that continue to give her a job and she knows this more than anyone. Perhaps the best way to react to her is ignore her. She is meaningless anyway and I don't think she is particularly that intelligent.

    i have seen examples in the house with Alicia Douvell and the discussion of organic food where she has been confronted and has tried to make a joke of it in order to pass it off.
  • Options
    norbitonitenorbitonite Posts: 8,678
    Forum Member
    SULLA wrote: »
    She is the thinking person's favourite.

    But she does it without being offensive or obnoxious. She does not claim that it's the Hopkins Show

    I'm a thinking person, and she's not my favourite. I also find her offensive and obnoxious in the extreme.
Sign In or Register to comment.