Daily Mail - hypocrites!

2

Comments

  • dosanjh1dosanjh1 Posts: 8,727
    Forum Member
    AndyTSJ wrote: »
    I don't understand why people moan and whinge about what is in the Daily Mail. I find a lot of what is written in the Guardian to be equally bad but that's the nature of politically biased newspapers.

    What is in the Guardian that is equally as bad as what is in the Mail?

    For a start, the Mail website is basically a soft porn site and the Guardians isn't.
  • LkjhLkjh Posts: 333
    Forum Member
    You mean the benefit culture that started under Thatcher?

    What has she got to do with it?

    This thread is about the Left not liking the Mail.
  • LkjhLkjh Posts: 333
    Forum Member
    Auld Snody wrote: »
    LOL. You must work for a PR company employed by the Mail.
    You claim that the mail tells it as it is then go on to use a generalisation to try and back that up. If you had figures and links to back up what you claim the mail is claiming, it would give your,and the mail's, views some credence .

    Yep. It's a conspiracy. Anyone who sticks up for the Mail is either

    A stupid
    B nasty
    C paid
    D naive

    Or all 4.
  • paul2307paul2307 Posts: 8,079
    Forum Member
    Lkjh wrote: »
    Yep. It's a conspiracy. Anyone who sticks up for the Mail is either

    A stupid
    B nasty
    C paid
    D naive

    Or all 4.

    Or maybe they just like sitting there laughing at the Left as the very mention of the Mail sends their blood pressure through the roof :D
  • LkjhLkjh Posts: 333
    Forum Member
    paul2307 wrote: »
    Or maybe they just like sitting there laughing at the Left as the very mention of the Mail sends their blood pressure through the roof :D

    Agreed. They call the Daily Mail the Daily Hate.

    And you can see from their posts that they are the ones consumed with hate and jealousy.
  • Peter the GreatPeter the Great Posts: 14,229
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Lkjh wrote: »
    What has she got to do with it?

    This thread is about the Left not liking the Mail.
    No it is not.You've obviously not read the thread properly then. The thread is about an article that was written after the death of Michael Foot which said bad things but they have a problem with people doing that with Margaret Thatcher. Next time read what the OP has started the thread for before posting.:rolleyes:
  • LkjhLkjh Posts: 333
    Forum Member
    No it is not.You've obviously not read the thread properly then. The thread is about an article that was written after the death of Michael Foot which said bad things but they have a problem with people doing that with Margaret Thatcher. Next time read what the OP has started the thread for before posting.:rolleyes:

    There is a massive difference between criticising someone's policy's and the bile the Left comes out with.
  • Auld SnodyAuld Snody Posts: 15,171
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Lkjh wrote: »
    There is a massive difference between criticising someone's policy's and the bile the Left comes out with.

    Trouble is you see criticising someone's policies as bile. Typical blinkered rightie thinking
  • Peter the GreatPeter the Great Posts: 14,229
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Lkjh wrote: »
    There is a massive difference between criticising someone's policy's and the bile the Left comes out with.
    Like the bile Littlejohn come out with about Foot? Dear is that all you have got as an argument?
  • smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    Lkjh wrote: »
    There is a massive difference between criticising someone's policy's and the bile the Left comes out with.

    You should see the bile the right comes out with about people like Galloway, Scargill or Brown
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,115
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    solenoid wrote: »
    I don't recall anyone releasing a song satirising Foot, to coincide with his funeral.

    The Ding Dong song hasn't been released to coincide with Thatcher's funeral. If some people want to buy it, that's up to them – it's a free country. Anyhow, maybe some people just like the song?
  • ChrissieAOChrissieAO Posts: 5,143
    Forum Member
    paul2307 wrote: »
    Or maybe they just like sitting there laughing at the Left as the very mention of the Mail sends their blood pressure through the roof :D

    :D:D:D:D
    The Mail online, with 45.3m readers, is now one of the leading online newspapers beating even the New York Times (44.8m). The Daily Mail has a readership of over 4m and The Mail on Sunday over 5m,
    There must be a lot of stupid people around is all I can say and me being one of them...
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,115
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ChrissieAO wrote: »
    :D:D:D:D
    The Mail online, with 45.3m readers, is now one of the leading online newspapers beating even the New York Times (44.8m). The Daily Mail has a readership of over 4m and The Mail on Sunday over 5m,
    There must be a lot of stupid people around is all I can say and me being one of them...

    Just goes to prove that the policy of writing controversial 'click-bait' stories works. Even those who hate the Mail will likely visit the site to see what the latest hoo-ha is all about.
  • ChrissieAOChrissieAO Posts: 5,143
    Forum Member
    Just goes to prove that the policy of writing controversial 'click-bait' stories works. Even those who hate the Mail will likely visit the site to see what the latest hoo-ha is all about.

    Actually it has been that popular for quite some time, nothing to do the Mrs Thatcher..
  • LkjhLkjh Posts: 333
    Forum Member
    Auld Snody wrote: »
    Trouble is you see criticising someone's policies as bile. Typical blinkered rightie thinking

    Err no I don't.

    I see things like ding dong as bile.
  • kate53kate53 Posts: 1,148
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Lkjh wrote: »
    Because it tells it as it is. The Left cannot stand, for example, how the Mail points out how the benefit culture in the UK has so corrupted some people's behaviour.

    You are joking - aren't you ? I can see you have been corrupted by the Daily Mail
  • LkjhLkjh Posts: 333
    Forum Member
    You should see the bile the right comes out with about people like Galloway, Scargill or Brown

    And how many on the right would have street parties or buy songs about a witch dying when they die?

    I would wager none.
  • LkjhLkjh Posts: 333
    Forum Member
    kate53 wrote: »
    You are joking - aren't you ? I can see you have been corrupted by the Daily Mail

    Like I said all Daily Mail readers are perceived as idiots etc.

    Mainly because they disagree with the likes of you......
  • kate53kate53 Posts: 1,148
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Lkjh wrote: »
    Like I said all Daily Mail readers are perceived as idiots etc.

    Mainly because they disagree with the likes of you......

    Actually I read the mail online so therefore am qualified to have an opinion , however , I do not take anything it says seriously . You just have to read readers comments to see how they wind people up , and that means, the more comments an article gets the better for them. I take most of what they print with a pinch of salt otherwise I would spend all my time being miserable and angry
  • humptymcnumptyhumptymcnumpty Posts: 928
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Cheetah666 wrote: »
    I expect they would have if he'd ever been Prime Minister. Leaders of the Opposition don't attract quite the same level of hatred from their political enemies - just wait till Tony Blair dies. :cool:

    I think that it will be a strange situation when he goes actually cos we're likely to get the right doing the praising and the left doing the criticism . Similar to this week I would guess. I don't know what song they would push to number one though.
  • Syntax ErrorSyntax Error Posts: 27,803
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    PeggysDad wrote: »
    We have had the Daily Mail incandescent with rage at the disrespect that they consider has been shown at the death of Margaret Thatcher.

    However, this same newspaper published an article 2 days after the death of Michael Foot which hardly adopted a respectful tone.

    How come it is ok for a former Labour leader to be castigated after death, but not a former Conservative leader?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1255529/Michael-Foot-good-Old-Footy-No-dangerous-deluded-hypocrite.html

    Too true.

    Hypocrisy in the extreme.
  • LkjhLkjh Posts: 333
    Forum Member
    kate53 wrote: »
    Actually I read the mail online so therefore am qualified to have an opinion , however , I do not take anything it says seriously . You just have to read readers comments to see how they wind people up , and that means, the more comments an article gets the better for them. I take most of what they print with a pinch of salt otherwise I would spend all my time being miserable and angry

    So how come I am corrupted by the Mail and you are not?
  • AdsAds Posts: 37,057
    Forum Member
    Majlis wrote: »
    Just out of interest, why are those on the Left (especially on this forum) so obsessed with the Daily Mail - most Tory supporters that I know dont read it so what makes it so powerful in the minds of those on the Left? :confused:

    It is odd the hatred that the left has for the Daily Mail - I think it stems from its website being so popular (most popular English language news website in the world) - so the site has so much influence.

    I do find the site very readable, but often ludicrous. You have glaring inconsistencies of tone, such as an article by Peter Hitchens lamenting the moral decline of Britain, then endless paparazzi shots of celebs wearing next to no clothes. the reason for this is that everything is based on being 'click bait' and getting as many hits as possible. the alternative is to go behind a paywall as the Times and Telegraph do.
  • kate53kate53 Posts: 1,148
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Lkjh wrote: »
    So how come I am corrupted by the Mail and you are not?

    Read my post - I do not take it seriously or see it as a 'news' paper- but, mind you, the femail section is quite good
  • smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    Lkjh wrote: »
    And how many on the right would have street parties or buy songs about a witch dying when they die?

    I would wager none.

    Point nicely avoided
Sign In or Register to comment.