Options
Australian swimmers told to take gun photo off Facebook
The Terminator
Posts: 5,312
Forum Member
✭
Story here
I'm kind of uneasy about this sort of thing. As far as I can tell from the article, they broke no laws...why should anyone have the right to order them to remove the pictures?
I'm sure there's probably some internal policy they've breached that gives the Olympic committee an excuse to bust their balls, but is it justified in a case like this? They didn't hurt anyone, they posed for a picture, and it seems like it's being treated as a very serious and important matter.
edit: and before an over eager mod moves this...it's not really about sport or London 2012, hence it not being in one of those sections.
I'm kind of uneasy about this sort of thing. As far as I can tell from the article, they broke no laws...why should anyone have the right to order them to remove the pictures?
I'm sure there's probably some internal policy they've breached that gives the Olympic committee an excuse to bust their balls, but is it justified in a case like this? They didn't hurt anyone, they posed for a picture, and it seems like it's being treated as a very serious and important matter.
edit: and before an over eager mod moves this...it's not really about sport or London 2012, hence it not being in one of those sections.
0
Comments
why is that even relevant? they are grown men and can do things like this without their approval
What if your mother is Heather Gummer?
I think a brightly coloured water pistol would do the trick.
However, the Australian committee probably knows about the likes of the British tabloids, and the sort of stories they like to spin.