Well for what other reason would you do a stunt like this?
Publicity, fame, a desire for attention, because someone suggested it to her, a playful expression of her sexuality, a "wardrobe malfunction".
It amazes me that in 2014, people are still unaware that females enjoy sex, and sometimes actively pursue sex and sexuality for its own sake. Footballers are forever taking their shirts off and flexing their pecs, you don't call of a sectioning when it happens.
Publicity, fame, a desire for attention, because someone suggested it to her, a playful expression of her sexuality, a "wardrobe malfunction".
It amazes me that in 2014, people are still unaware that females enjoy sex, and sometimes actively pursue sex and sexuality for its own sake. Footballers are forever taking their shirts off and flexing their pecs, you don't call of a sectioning when it happens.
There is a big difference between a bloke showing a bare chest and somebody flaunting their arse!
I like Amanda but she is vain and attention seeking. She has a great figure so combining her vanity and neediness for attention = bum flash. She has a raucous sense of humour so she would not see anything wrong with doing the shot. This Morning will be okay about it, she is drawing attention to their show.
Oh come on, if that had been a female presenter (e.g Davina McCall) doing a full-frontal nude piece to camera, the reaction would have been absolutely vicious. Charity or not.
And the comparison to Gino D'Acampo is still valid. He showed a lot more than Amanda and he simulated sex on camera, but it's Amanda who gets the vile comments because she's a woman.
Just a small sample of the Daily Mail comments:
"No wonder violence against women is rampant when celebrities are setting examples like this."
"What has happened to western culture that women feel they need to do this kind of thing?"
"Pathetic attention seeking woman."
"does any women have self respect now a days?"
"Women have no shame!"
"Not something that male presenters have to do..."
"women these days are so embarrassing."
"You know a woman is getting really desperate when she resorts to exposing her body to the nation in lieu of having any actual presenting talent."
There is a big difference between a bloke showing a bare chest and somebody flaunting their arse!
Not really, both are normally hidden with "everyday" clothing.
You could response to that with "so a persons knees are sexual are they?" and actually, up until recently yes they were. A woman who showed her knees was considered a bit of a sort. We used to call breast meat "white meat" to avoid even saying the word breast.
Comments
OK, I know the latter was for charity, but they were both revealing a lot more than Amanda.
No comparison...bib...;-)
It's less distasteful than How Miley C. Stands with her legs splayed out and pulling her underwear up between her legs. She does it to shock.
AH is more like "what the butler saw"
Plenty of glamour model type images on Google. It's not her main job I know, but she has done plenty of glamour modelling.
Clever
Publicity, fame, a desire for attention, because someone suggested it to her, a playful expression of her sexuality, a "wardrobe malfunction".
It amazes me that in 2014, people are still unaware that females enjoy sex, and sometimes actively pursue sex and sexuality for its own sake. Footballers are forever taking their shirts off and flexing their pecs, you don't call of a sectioning when it happens.
There is a big difference between a bloke showing a bare chest and somebody flaunting their arse!
There really isn't. I take it you have never been to a beach before? Best stay away if you find seeing flesh so disgusting!
She did some underwear shots very early in her career but that's it. She really isn't any kind of glamour model.
Oh come on, if that had been a female presenter (e.g Davina McCall) doing a full-frontal nude piece to camera, the reaction would have been absolutely vicious. Charity or not.
And the comparison to Gino D'Acampo is still valid. He showed a lot more than Amanda and he simulated sex on camera, but it's Amanda who gets the vile comments because she's a woman.
Just a small sample of the Daily Mail comments:
"No wonder violence against women is rampant when celebrities are setting examples like this."
"What has happened to western culture that women feel they need to do this kind of thing?"
"Pathetic attention seeking woman."
"does any women have self respect now a days?"
"Women have no shame!"
"Not something that male presenters have to do..."
"women these days are so embarrassing."
"You know a woman is getting really desperate when she resorts to exposing her body to the nation in lieu of having any actual presenting talent."
Hundreds of similar comments on there...
Not really, both are normally hidden with "everyday" clothing.
You could response to that with "so a persons knees are sexual are they?" and actually, up until recently yes they were. A woman who showed her knees was considered a bit of a sort. We used to call breast meat "white meat" to avoid even saying the word breast.
She has posed in several lads mags over the years. To me that's glamour modelling, however this is the most pointless debate I have ever been in!
Because she got her bum out?......okay.
This doesn't surprise me, she's so desperate.
My you did zoom in close ;-)
If she is mentally ill for showing her ar$e I hope she stays that way