Options

Are Oxbridge students the most intelligent?

LadyCakeLadyCake Posts: 3,126
Forum Member
✭✭✭
I was told "they are the creme de le creme" and a mini debate about people being taught to pass exams , academia and intelligence ensued.
Are those who attend Oxbridge college more intelligent than average in your opinion?
Do you worry that so much of public life , from the media to politics , is governed by people from just two unis?
«134

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 17,470
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I wouldn't say the media was governed by Oxbridge graduates at all, to be honest.
  • Options
    Lincoln HawkLincoln Hawk Posts: 1,783
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    More intelligent than average? Yes.
  • Options
    tealadytealady Posts: 26,267
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Having met several, yes.
    I don't think it matters that it is 2 unis, as for one thing, it is a collegiate system, so it more like 2x15 (or however many colleges there are) unis.
  • Options
    elliecatelliecat Posts: 9,890
    Forum Member
    When I was at Uni there used to be a joke that went round that you applied to that Uni if you failed to get in to Oxbridge.

    You have to go for an interview for Oxbridge and to be honest if they don't like you regardless of your grades they won't take you. My brother applied to Cambridge as his School said he had every chance of getting in (he was a straight A students who did Maths, Further Maths, Chemistry, Physics) he went for the interview wasn't successful which is good as he said he didn't like it anyway.
  • Options
    TCD1975TCD1975 Posts: 3,039
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    LadyCake wrote: »
    Are those who attend Oxbridge college more intelligent than average in your opinion?

    Yes
    LadyCake wrote: »
    Do you worry that so much of public life, from the media to politics, is governed by people from just two unis?

    No
  • Options
    The VixenThe Vixen Posts: 9,829
    Forum Member
    LadyCake wrote: »
    I was told "they are the creme de le creme" and a mini debate about people being taught to pass exams , academia and intelligence ensued.
    Are those who attend Oxbridge college more intelligent than average in your opinion?
    Do you worry that so much of public life , from the media to politics , is governed by people from just two unis?


    Anyone who is there who has been educated through the comprehensive schooling systen without any extra support are likely to be more intelligent than other students at other universities.

    For the majority, if they have struggled in any areas of education, they will have had the advantage of private tutors and additional support. They won't have had to work and study at the same time or save for books. They will have had the best support and the least pressure, so for students who fall into that category, then no they are not the most intelligent.

    They'd just be the best supported.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 68,508
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Well I was at Anglia Ruskin - does that count? No?

    Obviously they are a very highly selected group, and do seem to work ferociously hard these days. The days of the 'gentleman's third' seem long gone. My extremely bright, motivated daughter seemed to spend the whole three years in a flat panic, getting about 10 times as much work as some of her friends at other universities. I thought her essays were awe inspiring, but I suppose I am neither impartial nor bright enough to judge. :o
  • Options
    AnachronyAnachrony Posts: 2,757
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Is the average Oxbridge student more intelligent than the average of the general population? Yes, significantly so. Is every Oxbridge student smarter than every non-Oxbridge student? Of course not.
  • Options
    RorschachRorschach Posts: 10,818
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Anachrony wrote: »
    Is the average Oxbridge student more intelligent than the average of the general population? Yes, significantly so. Is every Oxbridge student smarter than every non-Oxbridge student? Of course not.
    What about the average Oxbridge student compared to the average non-Oxbridge university student?
  • Options
    Lincoln HawkLincoln Hawk Posts: 1,783
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Rorschach wrote: »
    What about the average Oxbridge student compared to the average non-Oxbridge university student?
    The average Oxbridge student is far smarter than the average non-Oxbridge student. It's not even close.
  • Options
    The VixenThe Vixen Posts: 9,829
    Forum Member
    The average Oxbridge student is far smarter than the average non-Oxbridge student. It's not even close.

    How do you measure intelligence?

    Is the student who has reached a non Oxbridge university getting a 2:1 or 1 but have had to study by themselves, no private tutors, having to work and study at the same time less intelligent than a non Oxbridge student who has been fully supported with additional private tuition, smaller class sizes etc.throughout their lives.

    Does additional support provide additional intelligence?
  • Options
    HogzillaHogzilla Posts: 24,116
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I didn't go to Oxbridge but did go to a Russell Group uni. In them days we all had interviews - only Hull, Warwick and a couple of the rubbishiest universities didn't do interviews. Even polytechnics did interviews. But the distinction was, for the better unis, you also had entrance exams (sat on the day of the interview).

    And of course straight A students didn't get in automatically. Depended how they did in interview, on the entrance exam, etc. When we got there we were told for every single one of us sitting there, there were 30 people who passed 3 or 4 A Levels - had applied for the places we had - and not got them.

    Only 2 of us out of 100 came from comprehensive schools - and both of us were Northerners. We were there on sheer merit and we knew it. What's wrong with that?:D

    I had no problem with the bar being set high. I did think about Oxford - and my form tutor wanted me to apply - but in the end I decided against it, feeling I probably would set my heart on it then not get in anyway.

    At uni I had a mate who was at Cambridge and he now, like me, is a professional writer. Which is all either of us ever wanted to do. In his case, I'm sure Cambridge helped him meet the right people to get his foothold in the world he now moves in. With me, it was a huge stroke of luck. He was brighter than anyone else I knew.
  • Options
    bleuh111bleuh111 Posts: 2,219
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    LadyCake wrote: »
    I was told "they are the creme de le creme" and a mini debate about people being taught to pass exams , academia and intelligence ensued.
    Are those who attend Oxbridge college more intelligent than average in your opinion?
    More intelligent than average, yes. All of them Stephen Hawking intelligent, no.

    Having said that, I've known kids who had their secondary education at Eton and Harrow who really weren't that bright. Again, brighter than average, but not brighter than average for upper-middle/upper class kids going to private schools.
    Do you worry that so much of public life , from the media to politics , is governed by people from just two unis?

    No. I'm actually quite comfortable with the people in charge not being thick as s**t.
  • Options
    The VixenThe Vixen Posts: 9,829
    Forum Member
    Hogzilla wrote: »
    I didn't go to Oxbridge but did go to a Russell Group uni. In them days we all had interviews - only Hull, Warwick and a couple of the rubbishiest universities didn't do interviews. Even polytechnics did interviews. But the distinction was, for the better unis, you also had entrance exams (sat on the day of the interview).

    And of course straight A students didn't get in automatically. Depended how they did in interview, on the entrance exam, etc. When we got there we were told for every single one of us sitting there, there were 30 people who passed 3 or 4 A Levels - had applied for the places we had - and not got them.

    Only 2 of us out of 100 came from comprehensive schools - and both of us were Northerners. We were there on sheer merit and we knew it. What's wrong with that?:D

    I had no problem with the bar being set high. I did think about Oxford - and my form tutor wanted me to apply - but in the end I decided against it, feeling I probably would set my heart on it then not get in anyway.

    At uni I had a mate who was at Cambridge and he now, like me, is a professional writer. Which is all either of us ever wanted to do. In his case, I'm sure Cambridge helped him meet the right people to get his foothold in the world he now moves in. With me, it was a huge stroke of luck. He was brighter than anyone else I knew.

    How long are you going back Hogzilla. Warwick is regularly in the Top 10 for English and are extremely hard to get places for their courses. They do full day interviews.

    I can go back seven years or more to vouch for that.

    I can't talk for all subjects of course but Warwick has a fantastic reputation.

    Just double checked Warwick was the sixth top university last year.

    http://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/single.htm?ipg=9982
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 61
    Forum Member
    The question in my mind is if they'd be deemed more intelligent than any other child given a more equal playing field regarding the level of teaching, support, and opportunities children get across the classes throughout their upbringing, and not just through university? I don't think they would be personally, I think the initial presence of a bright spark is optional to future success; while an initially glowing child of a poor family may eventually fade away into mediocrity, a more financially blessed, but less gifted child can still fall upwards to eventually become, say, chancellor of the exchequer.

    Going a little off topic though so to steer it back: yes, they probably would be more intelligent, or at least more educated, which is what encapsulates most people's ideas of intelligence I guess. To me it's more an issue of semantics, given the undefinable nature of intelligence.
  • Options
    HogzillaHogzilla Posts: 24,116
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Vixen wrote: »
    How long are you going back Hogzilla. Warwick is regularly in the Top 10 for English and are extremely hard to get places for their courses. They do full day interviews.

    I can go back seven years or more to vouch for that.

    I can't talk for all subjects of course but Warwick has a fantastic reputation.

    I date back to the 80s. I know the system changed ages back - around the same time as the funding. I got all my fees paid and a Full Grant - I'd never have gone to uni otherwise.:D

    I still think of the crap unis as - crap. Tough. I'm a product of my era.:D

    The advantage to having gone to a good uni is that alumni's kids can go to my old uni with an offer of just 2 Es.:D Son 3 is doing GCSEs now but seriously thinking of going to my old uni when the time comes. They keep that quiet though.;)
  • Options
    wallsterwallster Posts: 17,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    No.

    Next thread please :D
  • Options
    AzagothAzagoth Posts: 10,169
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Yes, of course they are.*

    *This may, or may not, be a biased opinion.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,588
    Forum Member
    There are usually many academically bright people attending Oxford and Cambridge and historically they are disproportionately from the privileged private/fee-paying section of society. I was in post-grad education with a number of Oxbridge grads and some were the cleverest, but the bulk simply academically solid. the difference for many was mainly their background and being trained to maximise their potential. some of the really clever ones were those who had been in the comprehensive system yet still excelled - like a bluff Northern lass I knew who had been to Trinity.
    University Challenge probably gives you some idea of the relative levels - many Oxbridge Colleges put forward teams that are good, but not good enough to successfully take on the new universities, redbricks and specialist colleges.

    As for most intelligent? You cannot be sure - I used to date a girl who had the best A-level marks in the whole of our county and chose to attend Wolverhampton Polytechnic.

    What you can say is that there are few students who are academically poor.

    Perhaps these days, the very brightest attend Harvard, Yale or MIT?
  • Options
    The VixenThe Vixen Posts: 9,829
    Forum Member
    Hogzilla wrote: »
    I date back to the 80s. I know the system changed ages back - around the same time as the funding. I got all my fees paid and a Full Grant - I'd never have gone to uni otherwise.:D

    I still think of the crap unis as - crap. Tough. I'm a product of my era.:D

    The advantage to having gone to a good uni is that alumni's kids can go to my old uni with an offer of just 2 Es.:D Son 3 is doing GCSEs now but seriously thinking of going to my old uni when the time comes. They keep that quiet though.;)

    I've just checked the league tables, it seems Warwick has come a long way. (editted my last post to include the link) Warwick was sixth top university overall in 2010, I'm trying to find where the English Department landed as they are often higher than the overall achievement.

    It's has an excellent reputation certainly going back seven years at least.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,588
    Forum Member
    Hogzilla wrote: »
    The advantage to having gone to a good uni is that alumni's kids can go to my old uni with an offer of just 2 Es.:D Son 3 is doing GCSEs now but seriously thinking of going to my old uni when the time comes. They keep that quiet though.;)

    I trust you were not an scholar of English...
  • Options
    HogzillaHogzilla Posts: 24,116
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Spoon wrote: »
    I trust you were not an scholar of English...

    I so was.:D

    As my old teacher used to say "You have to know the rules to break em".:D
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,588
    Forum Member
    Hogzilla wrote: »
    I so was.:D

    As my old teacher used to say "You have to know the rules to break em".:D

    Which you do so very well...


    :D
  • Options
    Watcher #1Watcher #1 Posts: 9,046
    Forum Member
    Brighter than the average person? Yes

    Brighter than average university students? Yes - competition for Oxbridge places means that (like any top university) they will be able to select the best

    Are all the brightest students at Oxbridge? No. The best students at any top Uni, and in the best courses in most will be as able as the best of those who go to Oxbridge
  • Options
    mills705mills705 Posts: 556
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Im just graduating from uni this summer and i know a few people at oxbridge.
    They are clever yes. But some of them were clever academically but social skills, common knowledge on simple things they struggled with. I was good friends with one and he couldnt tie a tie, open a window etc!
Sign In or Register to comment.