The Wedding Ring

Comments

• sebbie3000 Posts: 5,188

  Forum Member

  ✭

  01/06/10 - 09:29 #27

  sarahcs wrote: »

  Who had Post #23?
  
  
  
  
  
  (not being mean, I did spot the diamond too!)

  
  Actually - it was mentioned in post #11.
  
  Which I had, so I win!
  
  

  0
• Dear Viewer Posts: 1,657

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  01/06/10 - 10:28 #28

  currykev wrote: »

  If my girlfriend treated me like Amy does Rory, I'd dump the b*tch!

  
  You could draw a parallel with Rose's original situation with Mickey.
  
  However both found new partners in the 'Human' Doctor and Martha, and seem to be happy with their lot there.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 23

  Forum Member

  ✭

  01/06/10 - 11:37 #29

  Tehanu wrote: »

  I suspect the red ring box becomes the Pandorica - Pandora's box was something that never should have been opened; which could be true of the ring box which now contains a paradox.

  
  Way too cheesy and I don't agree that the box would now contain a paradox.

  0
• Tehanu Posts: 199

  Forum Member

  ✭

  02/06/10 - 19:31 #30

  cheesy was never a barrier to Doctor Who plots - and if a ring bought by someone who never existed is not a paradox, I don't know what is!

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 604

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  02/06/10 - 19:38 #31

  former.self wrote: »

  Way too cheesy and I don't agree that the box would now contain a paradox.

  
  Some cats might say that the box may or may not contain a paradox, as we don't know if the ring is still in it until the box is opened...

  0
• Tehanu Posts: 199

  Forum Member

  ✭

  02/06/10 - 19:42 #32

  possibly in a Tardis both states would have to exist simultaneously in the same volume of space...
  BOOM

  0
• johnnysaucepn Posts: 6,775

  Forum Member

  ✭

  02/06/10 - 20:39 #33

  aardvark85 wrote: »

  Some cats might say that the box may or may not contain a paradox, as we don't know if the ring is still in it until the box is opened...

  
  I like that. I do like that. A quantum spin on Pandora's box.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 116

  Forum Member

  ✭

  02/06/10 - 21:47 #34

  sebbie3000 wrote: »

  Actually - it was mentioned in post #11.
  
  Which I had, so I win!
  
  

  
  errr no you did not, that was my post I think you will find and so I am the winner!! :D:D

  0