By "dogging sites" I take it the person means real life places and not websites? That's up to the police. As far as I know it's still a public decency offence.
Ah yes, quite possibly they did mean that. It never occurred to me because the subject here is web sites, I just assumed that's what they were referring to.
I think you're correct, it is a public decency offence.
When I was a child, I'd say pornography was a pretty major thing in my life. I'm sure it is for the majority of of 12-18 year olds. It may sound stupid, but although I knew there was something off about me and it wasn't until I was around 11/12 that I started to look for pornography that I actually understood what was different about me to other guys and it helped me accept who I was - don't get me wrong, it's not like I was looking at porn and thinking "this is just so inspirational!" or anything like that, haha. But it did help me both understand and accept my sexuality.
What I find odd about this situation is that he is meeting with murdered children's parents to discuss it. I didn't realise watching pornography as a child led you to becoming a child killer or a paedophile?
They should be focusing on clamping down on paedophile rings and actually protecting children from predators, not rubbish like this :rolleyes:
they have managed to muddle a whole lot of issues together here. it's very cynical. underhanded.
With tobacco and many alcohol advertisements banned, it seems betting companies is really helping the sale of ads.. This will surely hurt a lot of online businesses.
If they really want to ban stuff, can I suggest they start with adverts by "no win no fee" law firms and payday loan companies.
These parasites are a LOT more damaging to society than mainstream, legal, adult porn in my view.
but that's my point anal sex is not to any woman I have spoken to in my life something they would want to do so why allow my sons to grow up seeing porn where it is the norm.it isn't.
Good lord you are a prude.
surveys suggest 30-50% of women have tried it. i've certainly met plenty.
By "dogging sites" I take it the person means real life places and not websites? That's up to the police. As far as I know it's still a public decency offence. But what you do in your bedroom alone or with consenting adults isn't anyone's business.
Cheers yeah that's the point!! never been to one never will!! and lets hope i never see one while im walking my grandchildren because all hell would break out i can assure you that !! disgusting behavior and as you say an offense
they have managed to muddle a whole lot of issues together here. it's very cynical. underhanded.
I agree with you and brb, there's too much grouping of completely different things under the same banner instead of concentrating on something that is already illegal.
Comments
Ah yes, quite possibly they did mean that. It never occurred to me because the subject here is web sites, I just assumed that's what they were referring to.
I think you're correct, it is a public decency offence.
Agree. As long as it's between consenting adults, the state has absolutely no business prying and dictating.
it is pretty obvious that you are the same person.
man up. admit it.
That's the thing isn't it.
See how far we've come already?
It's only been two minutes and we're already onto banning gambling sites!!
What on earth has gambling got to do with the initial stated aim?!
they have managed to muddle a whole lot of issues together here. it's very cynical. underhanded.
where did I say it was immoral between two consenting adults.
If they really want to ban stuff, can I suggest they start with adverts by "no win no fee" law firms and payday loan companies.
These parasites are a LOT more damaging to society than mainstream, legal, adult porn in my view.
Whether it will work or not is another matter.
www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/jul/22/cameron-no-ban-sun-page-3
here
don't be so vulgar.
The cant do that, Beecroft is a policy adviser, and a senior shareholder in wonga.
Plus, lots of MPs are lawyers, they dont eat their own.
Quite. An utterly cynical attempt to get the public onside with the whole 'pornography makes people kill kids' spiel.
And here's the proof .....
Talk about bang to rights!
quelle surprise
So if it's not immoral between two consenting adults, why do you agree with geordiejackie's position that it is?
Cheers yeah that's the point!! never been to one never will!! and lets hope i never see one while im walking my grandchildren because all hell would break out i can assure you that !! disgusting behavior and as you say an offense
jack
The dating industry are going to take a hit then.
I agree with you and brb, there's too much grouping of completely different things under the same banner instead of concentrating on something that is already illegal.
I can see people on benefits being forced to use this filter somewhere down the line, especially if we get a majority Tory government next term.
You'd think that many parents would be happy if the Tory website was blocked.
The Labour site would never be blocked, of course, as it's full of fairy stories designed for someone with the intelligence of a child.
your wrong.
Cameron piggybacks his cause on to something else, now this lot piggybacks theirs on to that.
Comical isn't it.
What an ar@ehole he is.