Options

Trivial things that annoy you about TV

1434446484988

Comments

  • Options
    hyperstarspongehyperstarsponge Posts: 16,701
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The fact that they not catering to most people on the main channels.
  • Options
    silversoxsilversox Posts: 5,204
    Forum Member
    It may have been mentioned before, but any scene in any drama filmed in a graveyard has to have obligatory crows / rooks cawing in the background. "Father Brown" was guilty of that today. Such a ridiculous cliché.

    I agree. Even worse are the magpies to be heard when something which could possibly be upsetting of traumatic is about to happen. Eastenders, Emmerdale and Midsommer Murders are all very guilty of that. Trouble is, the chap in charge of the sound effects (or whoever decides that we should hear the magpie's cackle) doesn't understand that they don't 'cackle' in the dead of night just when a body is being discovered. :D

    Oh, yes, and ..... am I the only one who finds that awful two note sound on Law & Order UK really eerie? I hate it!! :o:o:o
  • Options
    IJoinedInMayIJoinedInMay Posts: 26,323
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Gyles Brandreth on The One Show.
  • Options
    sausagesandwichsausagesandwich Posts: 2,593
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    mike1948 wrote: »
    Canned laughter on US comedy shows. It is so obviously included during the editing of the tape because the audience laughs at anything and every instance sounds identical to the last.

    When I was a child watching stuff like The Flintstones I could never work out where the laughter was coming from. I believed they screened the cartoon to a live audience but could not understand who on earth would go to watch a cartoon and laugh at everything, funny or not. Took me years to realise it was all canned.
  • Options
    sorrellsorrell Posts: 603
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I can't stand the way that z list celebs are wheeled out to make inane comments all the way through what could be really interesting nostalgia shows about certain decades. Whether it be about the toys, the music, the gadgets or what have you, I don't want to see the likes of Dom Joly or Lauren Laverne sitting on chairs telling us how their brentford nylon sheets used to spark at night, or how their nan bought them a slinky but they live in a bungalow - then throwing their heads back laughing. Just a witty voice over would suffice!

    The ridiculously long pauses when announcing the winners of anything...just get on with it!

    Consumer shows that could be quite interesting and useful made unwatchable by the use of puerile sketches to put the point across. Cue presenter dressed up as a cowboy and the good, bad and the ugly theme playing in the background...cue the off switch!
  • Options
    kempshottkempshott Posts: 1,883
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    John Finnemore sketch on one of my pet peeves:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06z5240#play

    +4.00 minutes in - so true!
  • Options
    carnoch04carnoch04 Posts: 10,275
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    cris182 wrote: »
    I always wonder about this too, Not TV but the film Titanic, Was tempted to see it until i was told the love story is a major part and then that song. They just throw it in because they think it appeals....Probably drives many away in fact

    That's probably why the movie was such a flop.
  • Options
    Mr Oleo StrutMr Oleo Strut Posts: 15,062
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    sorrell wrote: »
    I can't stand the way that z list celebs are wheeled out to make inane comments all the way through what could be really interesting nostalgia shows about certain decades. Whether it be about the toys, the music, the gadgets or what have you, I don't want to see the likes of Dom Joly or Lauren Laverne sitting on chairs telling us how their brentford nylon sheets used to spark at night, or how their nan bought them a slinky but they live in a bungalow - then throwing their heads back laughing. Just a witty voice over would suffice!

    The ridiculously long pauses when announcing the winners of anything...just get on with it!

    Consumer shows that could be quite interesting and useful made unwatchable by the use of puerile sketches to put the point across. Cue presenter dressed up as a cowboy and the good, bad and the ugly theme playing in the background...cue the off switch!

    Good points, sorrell, with which I agree. I would add dark, poorly-lit scenes, strange camera angles, mumbled dialogue, over-loud and inappropriate background music, gruesome close-ups of death in animal programmes, endless windbaggery from sports presenters, pointless speculation padding out news reports, rudery and bad language in place of talent, the repetition of programmes, and above all, the endless pandering to the egos of so-called tv celebrities!
  • Options
    WhyIsTVSoAwfulWhyIsTVSoAwful Posts: 608
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The gradually increasing amount of people on TV who don't say there Ts in certain words and just sound common

    Example - ''communi'y'', ''par'y'', ''socie'y''
  • Options
    firefly_irlfirefly_irl Posts: 4,015
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    kempshott wrote: »
    John Finnemore sketch on one of my pet peeves:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06z5240#play

    +4.00 minutes in - so true!

    Haha very true, why have a character clearly using a Mac and then show the screen using some clearly fake search engine.
  • Options
    bbclassicsbbclassics Posts: 7,806
    Forum Member
    carnoch04 wrote: »
    That's probably why the movie was such a flop.

    Or its success could have been based on the fact that the Titanic is one of the most iconic ships ever and what happened to it is one of the most well known disasters.
  • Options
    CaxtonCaxton Posts: 28,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The gradually increasing amount of people on TV who don't say there Ts in certain words and just sound common

    Example - ''communi'y'', ''par'y'', ''socie'y''

    Are they from the Newcastle area because they tend to do that, just their accent?
  • Options
    AbrielAbriel Posts: 8,525
    Forum Member
    Caxton wrote: »
    Are they from the Newcastle area because they tend to do that, just their accent?

    The one that always annoyed me was Carla' s"Pe'er" in corrie but she's not from Newcastle
  • Options
    barbelerbarbeler Posts: 23,827
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The fact that quiz shows exist.
  • Options
    WhyIsTVSoAwfulWhyIsTVSoAwful Posts: 608
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Caxton wrote: »
    Are they from the Newcastle area because they tend to do that, just their accent?

    Not one from the North East, all certainly sound to be from around London way or the South, it's mainly younger folks voicing over ads and programme trailers.
  • Options
    flappinfannyflappinfanny Posts: 118
    Forum Member
    Everything is so bland and safe and beige. UK TV is very beige. :(
  • Options
    degsyhufcdegsyhufc Posts: 59,251
    Forum Member
    Haha very true, why have a character clearly using a Mac and then show the screen using some clearly fake search engine.

    There's a film, I think called Unthinkable, and in a scene the bomb squad is defusing a bomb using a laptop.


    You can clearly see that the bomb defusing program on the laptop is a speadsheet :D
  • Options
    degsyhufcdegsyhufc Posts: 59,251
    Forum Member
    Everything is so bland and safe and beige. UK TV is very beige. :(

    War & Peace got coined Phwoar & Peace because there was a flash of side boob.

    Some of the recent US dramas are almost softcore porn!
  • Options
    firefly_irlfirefly_irl Posts: 4,015
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    This is more a media issue than a TV one but the minute a semi-good-looking guy takes his shirt off the media (Daily Mail) loses its mind and promotes him as some new sex symbol who their bored housewife demographic fawn over. Poldark, and War and Peace being prime examples.

    I feel however that TV will now play into this as it gets them so much publicity.
  • Options
    robbrarobbra Posts: 524
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Just watched a recording of Burt Reynolds with Piers someone. When going to old photos they shake the camera, then give it a second and go onto another. WHY?
    I think I've seen it on several other programmes but don't producers see this and think like a normal person would that this is stupid and irritating?
  • Options
    SuperAPJSuperAPJ Posts: 10,402
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    More4 (and E4?) having an American continuity announcer.
  • Options
    HarkAtHerHarkAtHer Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The fashion for having every programme begin with 5 minutes of 'catchup'.

    The Great Interior Design Show has taken this to new levels of idiocy by having first the catchup, THEN a preview of the programme you're about to watch! So you know that someone's going to paint a room dark blue before the thing's even started >:(
  • Options
    yviebabeyviebabe Posts: 6,050
    Forum Member
    Anything with 'Celebrity' in the title. And those godawful dramas that seem to be filmed in the half light, and everything is spoken in a whisper. Grrrr!
  • Options
    HarkAtHerHarkAtHer Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Cameramen who focus on the presenter rather than the thing being presented. So you get to hear fascinating stuff about an antique or engine part or whatever, while staring at a face trying to register interest.
  • Options
    Andy BirkenheadAndy Birkenhead Posts: 13,450
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The use of the words "Two times"
    I have just watched an advert for Solpadeine Soluble tablets which work "Two times as fast" as non soluble tablets.
    What's wrong with saying "TWICE AS FAST" ??
Sign In or Register to comment.