The Ratings Thread (Part 45)

1122123125127128145

Comments

  • NeilVWNeilVW Posts: 8,635
    Forum Member
    Rob1985 wrote: »
    Anything for Neighbours and The Walking Dead please?

    Channel 5 (exc/inc +1)
    13:45 - Neighbours: 709k (9.5%) / 711k (9.6%)
    17:30 - Neighbours: 945k (5.6%) / 1.00m (6.0%)

    FOX (exc/inc +1)
    22:00 - The Walking Dead: 346k (1.9%) / 358k (2.0%)
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 61
    Forum Member
    Rob1985 wrote: »
    Anything for Neighbours and The Walking Dead please?

    Neighbours 13:45 708,000 (9.5%)
    Neighbours 17:30 945,000 (5.6%)
    The Walking Dead 346,400 (1.92%)

    Figures exclude +1, include HD.
  • F1KenF1Ken Posts: 4,229
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Here's the ratings for every single episode of SNT. Hold on to your hats. All ratings are Officials from BARB. It's in the spoiler because it's big.
    Series 1

    8 June 2002 5.51
    15 June 2002 4.97
    22 June 2002 4.84
    29 June 2002 4.62
    6 July 2002 4.96
    13 July 2002 3.64

    Series 2

    11 January 2003 7.51
    18 January 2003 7.45
    25 January 2003 7.69
    1 February 2003 7.48
    8 February 2003 7.73
    15 February 2003 7.69
    22 February 2003 8.21
    1 March 2003 8.75
    8 March 2003 9.01
    15 March 2003 7.56
    22 March 2003 7.89

    Series 3

    13 March 2004 9.09
    20 March 2004 7.08
    27 March 2004 7.97
    3 April 2004 7.80
    10 April 2004 7.37
    17 April 2004 7.86

    Series 4

    2 October 2004 8.23
    9 October 2004 8.01
    16 October 2004 8.17
    23 October 2004 8.60
    30 October 2004 7.55
    6 November 2004 7.27

    Series 5

    12 February 2005 8.46
    19 February 2005 7.83
    26 February 2005 7.53
    5 March 2005 7.46
    12 March 2005 8.67
    19 March 2005 8.49
    26 March 2005 7.47
    2 April 2005 6.23
    9 April 2005 7.26
    16 April 2005 7.37
    Xmas special 24 December 2005 6.22

    Series 6


    16 September 2006 7.58
    23 September 2006 5.21
    30 September 2006 7.37
    7 October 2006 7.33
    14 October 2006 7.64
    21 October 2006 8.21

    Series 7

    8 September 2007 6.59
    15 September 2007 6.76
    22 September 2007 7.16
    29 September 2007 6.56
    6 October 2007 4.84
    13 October 2007 5.6

    Series 8

    16 February 2008 6.41
    23 February 2008 7.29
    1 March 2008 7.29
    8 March 2008 7.48
    15 March 2008 7.76
    22 March 2008 7.38

    Series 9

    14 February 2009 7.74
    21 February 2009 6.81
    28 February 2009 6.23
    7 March 2009 6.90
    14 March 2009 5.59
    21 March 2009 6.40

    Hmm? I have a strong belief that they ended it at the right time. I think it's a risk and it could go ether way. it's ether going to bounce back or continue on the trend of a slow decline. Can't say the rating for the last series were amazing.

    I don't know. I would have preferred Ant and Dec to actually use some imagination and come up with something new. My gut feeling is that it's going to be steady. Who knows it coild blow us away.

    Ken
  • NeilVWNeilVW Posts: 8,635
    Forum Member
    F1Ken wrote: »
    And then BBC Two it's now the other way around. Lack of daytime really hurting the old girl. Track cycling they have next week. I'm impressed that they seem to be showing allot of niche sport now BBC two doesn't have daytime.

    We knew the channel would be badly hurt and it has been. but 5.1% is not a disaster. I thought it would be lower.I wonder if BBC Two will ever get a daytime budget? I think not.

    I think they could do better with their choice of repeats. The Sign Zone is there for its PSB value, fair enough, but The One Show at lunchtime is unimaginative and is not even drawing a 2% share. For one thing, it probably shares a large audience crossover with the behemoth which is the 1pm news. Alas it must cost almost nothing to repeat so it may stay.

    I feel they should dig out some more factual gems from the archive on weekdays: history, travel, science: mix it up a bit more. You're right about the sport - there is much more scope to ditch the entire schedule and show more coverage now, which is a positive. Budget constraints mean a proper first-run daytime schedule for BBC Two, to run alongside BBC One's, is a very distant prospect, I feel.

    (by the way, I've now added ITV inc +1 shares to my post, and corrected the Others)
  • F1KenF1Ken Posts: 4,229
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    NeilVW wrote: »
    I think they could do better with their choice of repeats. The Sign Zone is there for its PSB value, fair enough, but The One Show at lunchtime is unimaginative and is not even drawing a 2% share. For one thing, it probably shares a large audience crossover with the behemoth which is the 1pm news. Alas it must cost almost nothing to repeat so it may stay.

    I feel they should dig out some more factual gems from the archive on weekdays: history, travel, science: mix it up a bit more. You're right about the sport - there is much more scope to ditch the entire schedule and show more coverage now, which is a positive. Budget constraints mean a proper, originated first-run daytime schedule for BBC Two, to run alongside BBC One's, is a very distant prospect, I feel.

    (by the way, I've now added ITV inc +1 shares to my post, and corrected the Others)

    I think the BBC Two schedule is a work in progress to be honest. They will change it around without a doubt.

    If it was me I would go all out factual repeats, sport coverage and current affairs and drop the one show and mastermind repeats. It's all going to probably rate quite low so why not go super niche! I would like to see more BBC four and maybe bbc three docs repeated as well.

    Ken
  • BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 23,990
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    NeilVW wrote: »
    Great Night Out
    Series 1 performance (exc / inc +1)

    ep 1 (11/01/13): 3.41m (13.9%) / 3.75m (15.2%)
    ep 2 (18/01/13): 2.95m (11.5%) / 3.21m (12.4%)
    ep 3 (25/01/13): 2.57m (10.5%) / 2.80m (11.4%)
    ep 4 (01/02/13): 3.01m (13.3%) / 3.22m (14.2%)
    ep 5 (08/02/13): 3.23m (14.1%) / 3.42m (15.0%)
    ep 6 (15/02/13): 3.43m (15.3%) / 3.61m (16.1%)

    Series average: 3.10m (13.1%) / 3.34m (14.1%)

    Episode 3 took a knock from the CBB final but otherwise it actually grew steadily after the inevitable dip for episode 2 which nearly all new shows suffer, and it finished on a series high if you exclude +1. I think the signs are good enough for a recommission, just about.
    EDIT: the demos will decide it, of course. If I can manage it, I'll find some demo ratings.

    Would be interesting to see the demos as in theory I'd have thought it would have better demos than most ITV shows.

    Even though an extra million would have been nice makes much more sense to recommission a slightly underperforming series which has generally been well received than start yet again with something else which might bomb anyway. With a repeat run in a decent enough slot and I suspect an ITV4 outing their is no reason why it couldn't pick up viewers second time around.

    As for the slot - Friday is fine IMO.
  • mlt11mlt11 Posts: 21,065
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Fudd wrote: »
    Arsenal join Liverpool in exiting the FA Cup; I doubt ITV will be overly delighted about that. They still have the two Manchester clubs and Chelsea and will be hoping that two of the three will be kept apart until the final and none of them suffer an upset.

    Yes, ITV and ESPN will be hoping for no more upsets this round.

    There's a dilemma in keeping the top teams apart - yes they want the top teams to go as far as possible but at the same time a game like Man U v Barnsley isn't ideal for prime-time live ITV in the 6th round either.

    At best (for ITV/ESPN) there will be 4 big clubs and 4 unfashionable teams in the quarter-finals. So if the big clubs are kept apart they want them away otherwise it could be a very mundane 6th round for the TV companies.
  • Rob1985Rob1985 Posts: 5,193
    Forum Member
    NeilVW wrote: »
    Channel 5 (exc/inc +1)
    13:45 - Neighbours: 709k (9.5%) / 711k (9.6%)
    17:30 - Neighbours: 945k (5.6%) / 1.00m (6.0%)

    FOX (exc/inc +1)
    22:00 - The Walking Dead: 346k (1.9%) / 358k (2.0%)
    KMair wrote: »
    Neighbours 13:45 708,000 (9.5%)
    Neighbours 17:30 945,000 (5.6%)
    The Walking Dead 346,400 (1.92%)

    Figures exclude +1, include HD.
    Thanks guys :)
  • NeilVWNeilVW Posts: 8,635
    Forum Member
    Brekkie wrote: »
    Would be interesting to see the demos as in theory I'd have thought it would have better demos than most ITV shows.

    I posted the Housewives with Kids and Men 16-34 demo averages for the full series of GNO earlier. Here they are again with the skews added:

    Housewives with Kids: 491.5k (16.8% share, TVR = 7.4) [15% skew]
    Men 16-34: 180k (10.0% share, TVR = 2.4) [5% skew]

    Here are a few other demos:

    Adults ABC1: 1.14m (10.6% share, TVR = 4.3) [35% skew]
    Adults 16-34: 465k (11.4% share, TVR = 3.15) [14% skew]
    Women 16-34: 286k (12.45% share, TVR = 3.9) [9% skew]
    Adults 65+: 734k (11.5% share, TVR = 7.1) [22% skew]

    And to compare:

    All individuals 4+: 3.34m (14.1% share, TVR = 5.8)
  • D.M.N.D.M.N. Posts: 34,167
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Only just realised that in the final schedules, BBC moved the BBC News bulletin in between the two Six Nations games next Saturday, meaning that Let's Dance for Comic Relief and Saturday Night Takeaway are in a direct head-to-head clash from 19:00 - scheduling genius from BBC.
  • FuddFudd Posts: 166,872
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    mlt11 wrote: »
    Yes, ITV and ESPN will be hoping for no more upsets this round.

    1-0 Oldham...
  • NeilVWNeilVW Posts: 8,635
    Forum Member
    D.M.N. wrote: »
    Only just realised that in the final schedules, BBC moved the BBC News bulletin in between the two Six Nations games next Saturday, meaning that Let's Dance for Comic Relief and Saturday Night Takeaway are in a direct head-to-head clash from 19:00 - scheduling genius from BBC.

    Can't work out if you are being ironic here, although there is no :rolleyes: so perhaps you're not. :) Definitely better not to have the news up against Ant 'n' Dec and giving them a headstart. It's a fascinating clash and I can't predict which will win.

    They've cut the afternoon news to 10 minutes from the usual 20 to fit it in between the rugby matches.
  • Hassaan13Hassaan13 Posts: 41,973
    Forum Member
    F1Ken wrote: »
    Hmm? I have a strong belief that they ended it at the right time. I think it's a risk and it could go ether way. it's ether going to bounce back or continue on the trend of a slow decline. Can't say the rating for the last series were amazing.

    6-7m for a show like it (family entertainment) is brilliant, especially considering the ratings we get on Saturday nights in January-March nowadays.
  • Glenn AGlenn A Posts: 23,796
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    NeilVW wrote: »
    Channel 5 (exc/inc +1)
    13:45 - Neighbours: 709k (9.5%) / 711k (9.6%)
    17:30 - Neighbours: 945k (5.6%) / 1.00m (6.0%)

    FOX (exc/inc +1)
    22:00 - The Walking Dead: 346k (1.9%) / 358k (2.0%)

    Neighbours seems to be holding steady, with viewing figures around the 1.7 million mark. While the show certainly can never compete with Corrie now, as it did in the eighties, it shows that a loyal following remains. Again another sensible purchase for Channel 5 and something that regularly does well for them.
  • tamibecketttamibeckett Posts: 5,261
    Forum Member
    So Sarah Michelle Gellar has been casted in a pilot from CBS.

    Along with Sarah, CBS has the following actors in their 2013 pilots:

    Jason Isaacs, Josh Holloway, Robin Williams, David Alan Grier, Rupert Grint, Dylan McDermott, Toni Collete, James Wolk, Kevin Pollak, etc

    :eek:
  • D.M.N.D.M.N. Posts: 34,167
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    NeilVW wrote: »
    Can't work out if you are being ironic here, although there is no :rolleyes: so perhaps you're not. :)

    Nope, no sarcasm. :)
  • xfactorfan27xfactorfan27 Posts: 1,237
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I really hope Lets Dance flops hard this year- it's total cr*p.

    The BBC should bring back Comic Relief does Fame Academy, or create a new Comic Relief TV show. Lets Dance is an embarrassment.
  • Chris1964Chris1964 Posts: 19,725
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I really hope Lets Dance flops hard this year- it's total cr*p.

    The BBC should bring back Comic Relief does Fame Academy, or create a new Comic Relief TV show. Lets Dance is an embarrassment.

    Iv always thought its been cheap thrown together stuff-its greatest highlights Rufus Hound and especially Robert Webb(about 3 minutes altogether). Overall though its the BBC trying its least hardest to support Comic Relief.
  • BrekkieBrekkie Posts: 23,990
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    If they are going to do more Superstars rather than throwing it out in the summer they'd be best holding it back for Sport Relief next year in place of Let's Dance - though the issue is how they make money (for charity, so it's OK!) out of it.

    Let's Dance would be much stronger now had they only used it for Comic Relief and not for Sport Relief too.
  • xfactorfan27xfactorfan27 Posts: 1,237
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Chris1964 wrote: »
    Iv always thought its been cheap thrown together stuff-its greatest highlights Rufus Hound and especially Robert Webb(about 3 minutes altogether). Overall though its the BBC trying its least hardest to support Comic Relief.

    Definitely. I don't understand why they've introduced free web voting this year either. Surely that means that they'll just raise less money for Comic Relief...:confused:
  • Hassaan13Hassaan13 Posts: 41,973
    Forum Member
    I really hope Lets Dance flops hard this year- it's total cr*p.

    The BBC should bring back Comic Relief does Fame Academy, or create a new Comic Relief TV show. Lets Dance is an embarrassment.

    How about Comic Relief does Glee Club? That's also pretty good.
  • CharnhamCharnham Posts: 61,157
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Hassaan13 wrote: »
    How about Comic Relief does Glee Club? That's also pretty good.
    wasn't that a CBBC thing?
  • NeilVWNeilVW Posts: 8,635
    Forum Member
    Lets Dance is an embarrassment.

    Isn't that the point of it?;)

    It's gloriously naff, but I bet it's creaming the football in the ratings.
  • SamuelWSamuelW Posts: 8,447
    Forum Member
    Lets Dance is in an easy slot tonight against weak competition, football involving two fairly minor teams. So it will automatically rate really well today. But this is a stale, boring format well past its best with poor production values and once it faces decent competition, its ratings will sink.
  • Hassaan13Hassaan13 Posts: 41,973
    Forum Member
    Charnham wrote: »
    wasn't that a CBBC thing?

    Yes but its pretty decent - probably as good as Lets Dance. The presenters are more entertaining for a start. The glee clubs are really good also.
This discussion has been closed.