I hope not, Jeff's OK and he almost carries the show himself, Rachel needs to contribute a LOT more, she only really reacts to Jeff's questions and silly jokes.
I can't see how a new presenter will regain the lost viewers.
I have every faith in Jeff, he seems to really enjoy it - something I wasn't convinced of, with Des squared! He's relaxed and easygoing, and gets the humour just right imo. Heck even my 85 year old MIL, who had no idea who he was, has taken to him. Took Rachel longer, but she's finally settled in and mostly gets the numbers now. Personally find it a very watchable 40 minutes.
I bet Rachel's pleased her dresses are having the desired effect. She started off in fairly mumsy dresses, but apparently wanted her own style. So had a bit of a splurge on new dresses for the show; might be wrong, but I think her pink number today was the first one she's worn twice!
I bet Rachel's pleased her dresses are having the desired effect.
If the desired effect is making viewers switch off, then yes, it's working a treat.
Seriously though, I'm not sure the traditional Countdown audience (pensioners) would feel comfortable with some of Rachel's outfits, as pleasing to the eye to some posters as they are.
So are the viewing figures for Countdown actually down on what they used to be? I think Countdown is brilliant now with Jeff and Rachel at the helm and they both appear to have made this show their own, especially Jeff who is doing a great job as host. Jeff is far better than Des Lynam and Des O'Connor
I know some of Rachel's outfits are a bit WOW!, but I'm sure older audiences can switch off from that and enjoy the game as it unfolds just as much as before.
I bet Rachel's pleased her dresses are having the desired effect. She started off in fairly mumsy dresses, but apparently wanted her own style. So had a bit of a splurge on new dresses for the show; might be wrong, but I think her pink number today was the first one she's worn twice!
It's a bit sad, but I can confirm that yes, that is the case.
Today's is a belter too. I'm going to lead the campaign to increase her rating when the FHM 100 comes round again.
Have any of you ever seen Richard Digance do a live gig? As I've noticed posters around my local town centre advertising his show at the theatre this month and am tempted to pop along
Have any of you ever seen Richard Digance do a live gig? As I've noticed posters around my local town centre advertising his show at the theatre this month and am tempted to pop along
Today, the contestants manged to get 'SEXIER', which lead to a great shot of Rachel standing by the word on the board. That'd make a great screen shot.
The letters that 'sexier' came out of was a letter 'A' away from allowing the phrase 'SEXY ARSE' to be made.
If the desired effect is making viewers switch off, then yes, it's working a treat.
Seriously though, I'm not sure the traditional Countdown audience (pensioners) would feel comfortable with some of Rachel's outfits, as pleasing to the eye to some posters as they are.
I am an oap and her outfits do a lot for me :p:eek:
I catch the very early morning repeats. She gives me wood at 5:30am!
Re:the early morning repeats.
According to my Freeview EPG, there's no Countdown repeats next week,despite the fact it's still on at 3.25pm all week with no pre-emptions for racing. Instead it's some programe called Switched and repeats of St Elsewhere which will be shown in CD's slot.
What a relief to have Tim there this week. You could tell Jeff was pleased too and a good guest just changes the whole atmosphere. Current lad doing well, although frustrating when good players with a bit of personality and potential are sent home early.
Susie looked especially pretty today in her white frilly shirt and Rachel of course, in a dress so slinky it reminded me a bit of a hot water bottle cover!
As for Friday's Conundrum - "Luton hags" :eek: Now that was certainly a tricky one!
What a relief to have Tim there this week. You could tell Jeff was pleased too and a good guest just changes the whole atmosphere. Current lad doing well, although frustrating when good players with a bit of personality and potential are sent home early.
Susie looked especially pretty today in her white frilly shirt and Rachel of course, in a dress so slinky it reminded me a bit of a hot water bottle cover!
As for Friday's Conundrum - "Luton hags" :eek: Now that was certainly a tricky one!
Yes I agree it always a better week when we have good guests and players and this week is one of them
I must say that in my opinion Rachel has all the personality of a plank of wood.
I agree with Oddbod. I don't see a problem with Rachel on Countdown at all.
I don't understand the criticism that Rachel has received for having no personality or experience especially since Carol Vorderman had none to start with.
And let's face it, if the UK find it acceptable to have a stand-up comedian with no journalistic experience doing a news-oriented breakfast show on BBC Newcastle, and find it OK for someone like Sinitta to be a advisor on X Factor, then I don't know why Rachel is the one receiving criticism for taking a dream job with no experience herself.
Good contest today (tues) with both players getting over a 100 points, I haven't seen that for a while.
Rachel's ensemble was disappointingly restrained and demure, this will just not do at all.
We need outfits a lot shorter and a lot tighter.
Yes, a rollercoaster of a match, with both contestants getting two sets of nine each. Shame to lose her, as she was really good. Presumably we may see her again, assuming they still give the highest loser a chance in the finals?
Surprised to see Kirk pop up in the audience; trust him to be the only one in the building to get the conundrum!
Yes, a rollercoaster of a match, with both contestants getting two sets of nine each. Shame to lose her, as she was really good. Presumably we may see her again, assuming they still give the highest loser a chance in the finals?
Surprised to see Kirk pop up in the audience; trust him to be the only one in the building to get the conundrum!
I didn't like it when Mavis Riley and Dennis Healey first took over and stopped watching for a while, but I am getting to like them now and have started watching again, especially Mavis' dresses, and her arse is even better than Carol's.
Pudenda(s) ( can it be pluralised ? ) was a 7/8 letter option in one of yesterday's selections but I think Suzi was too embarrassed to highlight it and describe its meaning.
Comments
I can't see how a new presenter will regain the lost viewers.
I bet Rachel's pleased her dresses are having the desired effect. She started off in fairly mumsy dresses, but apparently wanted her own style. So had a bit of a splurge on new dresses for the show; might be wrong, but I think her pink number today was the first one she's worn twice!
If the desired effect is making viewers switch off, then yes, it's working a treat.
Seriously though, I'm not sure the traditional Countdown audience (pensioners) would feel comfortable with some of Rachel's outfits, as pleasing to the eye to some posters as they are.
I know some of Rachel's outfits are a bit WOW!, but I'm sure older audiences can switch off from that and enjoy the game as it unfolds just as much as before.
It's a bit sad, but I can confirm that yes, that is the case.
Today's is a belter too. I'm going to lead the campaign to increase her rating when the FHM 100 comes round again.
Richard Digance Tour Dates & Tickets on Ents24.com
Yes, I saw him a couple of years back in Hayes Beck Theatre - he was very funny and extremely entertaining.
The letters that 'sexier' came out of was a letter 'A' away from allowing the phrase 'SEXY ARSE' to be made.
I am an oap and her outfits do a lot for me
Re:the early morning repeats.
According to my Freeview EPG, there's no Countdown repeats next week,despite the fact it's still on at 3.25pm all week with no pre-emptions for racing. Instead it's some programe called Switched and repeats of St Elsewhere which will be shown in CD's slot.
The aformentioned word from Friday. It's now my PC's wallpaper.
Well, if she is a plank of wood, I loved to nail it.
Happy days.
Susie looked especially pretty today in her white frilly shirt and Rachel of course, in a dress so slinky it reminded me a bit of a hot water bottle cover!
As for Friday's Conundrum - "Luton hags" :eek:
Oh dear Methodyguy I like you a lot as you know but we are going to disagree on this one:):)
Yes I agree it always a better week when we have good guests and players and this week is one of them
I agree with Oddbod. I don't see a problem with Rachel on Countdown at all.
I don't understand the criticism that Rachel has received for having no personality or experience especially since Carol Vorderman had none to start with.
And let's face it, if the UK find it acceptable to have a stand-up comedian with no journalistic experience doing a news-oriented breakfast show on BBC Newcastle, and find it OK for someone like Sinitta to be a advisor on X Factor, then I don't know why Rachel is the one receiving criticism for taking a dream job with no experience herself.
Rachel's ensemble was disappointingly restrained and demure, this will just not do at all.
We need outfits a lot shorter and a lot tighter.
Yes, a rollercoaster of a match, with both contestants getting two sets of nine each. Shame to lose her, as she was really good. Presumably we may see her again, assuming they still give the highest loser a chance in the finals?
Surprised to see Kirk pop up in the audience; trust him to be the only one in the building to get the conundrum!
It was good to see Kirk again.
Pudenda(s) ( can it be pluralised ? ) was a 7/8 letter option in one of yesterday's selections but I think Suzi was too embarrassed to highlight it and describe its meaning.