Should Jason be axed from DOI ?

Comments

• FunkyFoxtrot Posts: 1,184

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 10:24 #2

  YES! And the sooner the better!

  0
• winenroses Posts: 6,470

  Forum Member

  ✭

  29/03/10 - 10:24 #3

  Yes, he should.

  0
• lach doch mal Posts: 16,328

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  29/03/10 - 10:28 #4

  Yes. It would make a refreshing change.

  0
• samiskim Posts: 1,169

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 10:32 #5

  Yes, of course he should be axed - unprofessional creature that he is.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 1,984

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 10:33 #6

  Yes, Yes and YES!

  0
• Daisy19 Posts: 3,311

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 10:35 #7

  No definitely not!

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 220

  Forum Member

  ✭

  29/03/10 - 10:35 #8

  No, absolutely not, he's the only one that tells the honest truth - and yes, it is sometimes brutal - but why pussyfoot about like the rest of the panel (with maybe the exception of Nicky)? If someone is not good at something, then they are not good. Typical of society today, when we are not allowed to criticise anyone or anything, always got to look for the "positive" - regardless!
  
  These "celebrities" are getting well paid for being on DOI and they know what Jason is like - if they don't want his criticism then they shouldn't accept the money to appear.

  0
• CaroUK Posts: 6,354

  Forum Member

  ✭

  29/03/10 - 10:35 #9

  A million times YES!!!!!

  0
• lulu g Posts: 52,642

  Forum Member

  ✭

  29/03/10 - 10:46 #10

  I wouldn't be sorry to see the back of him. Honesty is fine, criticism is fine, but there's a line and Jason crosses it.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 3,587

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 10:48 #11

  Yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

  0
• janetcomelately Posts: 7,405

  Forum Member

  ✭

  29/03/10 - 10:48 #12

  No.
  
  All panels need someone to pretend to be mean to bring in controversey and its associated publicity for the show.

  0
• welwynrose Posts: 33,666

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 10:55 #13

  Yes I'm sure they could replace him with a judge that is "nasty" but not just plain rude like Jason

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 3,506

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 10:56 #14

  No. But, please sack Nicky Slater instead.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 202

  Forum Member

  ✭

  29/03/10 - 11:57 #15

  Yes! For god's sake, bin him off!

  0
• Strictly_Irish Posts: 18,757

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  29/03/10 - 11:58 #16

  YES! :mad:

  0
• blueabu Posts: 1,656

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 12:03 #17

  He will NEVER be axed, the publicity he gives the show probably saves it.
  
  ITV are not daft, in fact they probably encourage him to be Mr Nasty.
  
  After all, look at all the attention he gets on here.
  
  And all publicity is good when trying to get the ratings up

  0
• Button62 Posts: 8,463

  Forum Member

  ✭

  29/03/10 - 12:06 #18

  Yes he should, but DOI won't bin him because he is part of the "formula" required for a judging panel.
  
  He is an odious little twonk though.

  0
• MaryS Posts: 1,790

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 12:21 #19

  No!I think he's needed on the panel & show.I know he's abit OTT but he adds something,livens things up & imo tells it how it is really.

  0
• welwynrose Posts: 33,666

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 12:24 #20

  Finny wrote: »

  No, absolutely not, he's the only one that tells the honest truth - and yes, it is sometimes brutal - but why pussyfoot about like the rest of the panel (with maybe the exception of Nicky)? If someone is not good at something, then they are not good. Typical of society today, when we are not allowed to criticise anyone or anything, always got to look for the "positive" - regardless!
  
  These "celebrities" are getting well paid for being on DOI and they know what Jason is like - if they don't want his criticism then they shouldn't accept the money to appear.

  
  you can criticise someone with out being rude about it - that is what Jason fails to do

  0
• xKatieLx Posts: 4,400

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 12:36 #21

  NO
  
  
  Should Nicky?
  
  YES!!!!!!

  0
• lach doch mal Posts: 16,328

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  29/03/10 - 12:37 #22

  Ha I just voted on the poll and as i was first, I got 100%:D:D:D.

  0
• Syqo Posts: 1,188

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 12:37 #23

  Yes, absolutely.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 1,437

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 12:38 #24

  Finny wrote: »

  No, absolutely not, he's the only one that tells the honest truth - and yes, it is sometimes brutal - but why pussyfoot about like the rest of the panel (with maybe the exception of Nicky)? If someone is not good at something, then they are not good. Typical of society today, when we are not allowed to criticise anyone or anything, always got to look for the "positive" - regardless!
  
  These "celebrities" are getting well paid for being on DOI and they know what Jason is like - if they don't want his criticism then they shouldn't accept the money to appear.

  
  This! A million times this!

  0
• LazySusan Posts: 6,413

  Forum Member

  ✭

  29/03/10 - 12:47 #25

  Absolutely YES

  0
• tiddleboo Posts: 1,827

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  29/03/10 - 12:52 #26

  No.
  
  All the judges are rubbish and biased, he's just the only one who goes too far. rather like a child
  
  Be poorer without him

  0