Is Izzy right ?
roverboy1965
Posts: 1,679 Forum Member
✭✭✭
Her comment to tommy about her only using him
Wonder if she uses Rita, her flat and money along with tommy in an ensuing court battle to give the impression of a stable relationship and home and as soon as she wins (in a year or so's time) promptly dumps Tommy and up sticks and goes off to be single mum on benefits (her dramatic exit from corrie) ?
Wonder if she uses Rita, her flat and money along with tommy in an ensuing court battle to give the impression of a stable relationship and home and as soon as she wins (in a year or so's time) promptly dumps Tommy and up sticks and goes off to be single mum on benefits (her dramatic exit from corrie) ?
0
Comments
I think if a woman was walking away with your child, you'd be pretty nasty yourself. Just because the law is on Tina's side doesn't make it right.
What I love about this story is it shows how flawed the law is, and how biological parents do not have the rights to their child when a surrogate is involved.
Her condition didn't make her miscarry specifically but I'm sure it was that she was deemed more 'at risk' than a non-disabled woman. She just didn't want to go through the pain and stress again, in case she lost another baby.
I'm conflicted about who is right her but I think Tina has a cheek to say that the Armstrong/Windass clan are an 'unstable family' given that she has JUST got back with Tommy. Izzy and Garry are going through a rough patch, but they have been a stable couple for years now.
Apart from the fact that they are no longer together and Gary tried to get off with Tina a couple of weeks ago they're fine.
I like the way they have done this storyline as it does happen.
Yeah that's what I meant by 'rough patch', I still find them, generally, a lot more stable that Tommy and Tina, who haven't been together for a year.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-431168/Couple-launch-custody-battle-surrogate-mother-decides-babies.html
Wow, the law in this country really needs to catch up! Wonder what happened in this case.
Thanks Caligula75. First time I've seen it. Very interested to see what outcome is decided. Me personally, I think they should be with their biological parents.
Edit: Just seen the date!
I agree,
Thanks for the link.. Very interesting.
Really happy to see another article where it says the twins were given to the biological parents in an out-of-court settlement.
Me too and I think that's because both sides have right and wrong on their side. On the one hand it isn't Tina's biological baby but she carried it and has gone through all the associated feelings and emotions and had Gary coming on to her and the subsequent break up of Gary and Izzy's relationship. I also think the baby being premature and perhaps this being facilitated by the pressure she felt under from Gary, Izzy and all the Windass's has resulted in her making what seems on the surface to be an odd decision.
As for Izzy it is literally her baby and maybe her only chance to have a baby in her mind so it is devastating.
I truly think that the only satisfactory outcome will be for the baby to turn out to be Tina and Tommy's and her decision could be put down to Tina's instinct or something because even if Tina leaves with the baby surely Izzy is going to start court proceedings and that would take forever.
The parents received full custody of the twins. As they should have. I did find the story back in 07 but as the identities have been protected, it's not obvious to google. But I'm sure my fellow DS mates can find the result.
They wern't the father got rights to have them at weekends the couple didn't get custody.
No. The couple got custody. Google it. The father received visitations rights DURING the court case as he is LEGALLY the father.
This case explains how Gary has rights which he can pursue in a court of law.
I'm not partial to any of these f?wit characters. I'm just irritated that emotion is standing in the way of reality.
Seems to me Izzy is geting more and more twisty by the hour. When was Tina ever her friend before she paid for her womb all shes done since is try and control her life.
The facts as Gary admitted where laid down to them at day one, that this was a possibilty and they where given advise on how to avoid it but like all else they ignored it. Because in any appeal they just have to say they paid for the baby and they have had it.
Tina should of just called the Police on Owen for breaking into her flat and burglary shes his tennant so he would of had a hell of a time explaining why he broke in and tampered with all her goods and chattle same with Anna who has no legal right at all to do so.
So, Owen throwing her out is nasty but not actually illegal. Just as. To many, Tina reneging on the agreement and keeping the baby is nasty but not illegal.
Interesting twist at the end of that case. From another article:
Can be found in this article about surrogacy:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-522670/Im-white-woman-Ive-surrogate-mother-Asian-couple.html
Does that mean she'll now be wearing a Mac as well, just like Detective Dev??
I'm probably a bad man for this next bit, but I also roared with laughter when that parked car blocked her in the garden & she couldn't get to Tina to hassle her!!!!
You are sooooo going to hell, Q !!
(And personally I think Joor/Jeerk would be better off being raised by dingos than any of that lot.)
I also think that had Gary not made a pass at Tina then she maybe would have felt differently about keeping the baby. I think big momma Windass needs to see that instead of getting nasty.