When the photo appeared, my first thought was that reminds me of Sherlock Holmes :eek: (lol) minus the deerstalker hat and its not a pipe. I guess its the shadow effect(?) *blinks* *cleans glasses*
The former boy scout said he was nine when he was forced to give oral sex to an accomplice of Jimmy Savile while the TV host looked on and laughed.
Kevin Cook said he was physically and sexually abused by Savile and another man on a trip to BBC studios to watch the filming of Jim'll Fix It.
He claimed that while he was being sexually abused by Savile a second man walked into the dressing room but just said "oops" and walked back out. He has now spoken to police.
Cook said: "The man walked into the room and carried on the abuse. He made me do stuff to him and he physically abused me as well, he hit me.
Before I was 50/50 with that story. Now I don't believe him. The guy hit him? Did his chaperone and his scouts colleagues didn't find nothing amiss with the boy? Didn't they see the bruises? For how long he was out? It must have take at least 20 minutes. Didn't nobody noticed him absent? Why he has now come up with this story? He probable read Savile was capable of worse and also read the North Wales boy's story (being abused as Savile laugh).
I wish they stopped printing the Duncroft and Caroline Moore stories. Until everything is sorted out about what really happened there. And Caroline Moore seems to like talking to the press way too much.
I see the patron of Norwood is Her Majesty the Queen along with Cherie Blair and a member of the Rothchild family is a honoury President.
It is also a sinister fact that since the Romanian Orphan promulgated scare, it has been the House of Windsor and friends all over the orphanages throughout Romania.
We then have Sir Elton John causing big promotion of the adoption industry, with Madonna and Jolie (that bird that kisses her brother like you do your partner) playing to the distasteful game of child kidnap, because it is he child's right...
Creepy people playing a creepy game, but of course the worst of it is in what they actually want, complete control over social services through their charitable trust fronts, in order they are the beneficiaries in all ways to those children removed from families.
In Romania ARK (Absolute Return for Kids) have been the main player in taking over Romanian social services and orphanages, the patron of ARK is Prince William. Here is a link to a great book by a friend of mine on the topic of Orphans in Romania :
In exposing their own networks they aim to take the lot through a serious deception, in that sense this thread has been a great plucker of information they don';t want in the mix.
When the photo appeared, my first thought was that reminds me of Sherlock Holmes :eek: (lol) minus the deerstalker hat and its not a pipe. I guess its the shadow effect(?) *blinks* *cleans glasses*
You could be right. I thought of Fagin myself. It's an arty sort of photograph and would work in black and white retro silhouette or even shades of grey as the "eminence grise" he called himself. Actually just leave it as it is now and it already says that.
Paedophile Liberation Exchange (PIE) and those involved with Ark Academy schools.
Liberty, also known as the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL) has been affiliated with the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) and Paedophile Action for Liberation.
Miss Harman left NCCL in 1982 when she was elected MP for Camberwell and Peckham, by which time several members of PIE had been jailed for conspiracy to corrupt public morals. A spokesman for Miss Harman said: “She has always opposed child pornography and has never supported PIE and to suggest that she did is untrue and misleading. “NCCL’s approach to the protection of children’s bill was to argue for clear definitions in the bill to make sure the law was precise so that it was about child protection and not about censorship.” The spokesman added: “PIE had been excluded from the NCCL before she became legal officer.” However press cuttings from 1983 make it clear that it was still considered an “affiliate group”.
You could be right. I thought of Fagin myself. It's an arty sort of photograph and would work in black and white retro silhouette or even shades of grey as the "eminence grise" he called himself. Actually just leave it as it is now and it already says that.
He looks a bit like Worzel Gummidge, doesn't he? And he's got such a big nose!
I remember reading a comment on youtube last year asking why he bothered to get a wart on his face removed, presumably inferring that he didn't seem too bothered about his looks otherwise, though im not sure how true that is(?). It wasn't mentioned in the biography, so I presume if he did get it taken off, that it wasn't due to any health issue, or it would have been documented? who knows.
The satanic thing seems to be straight out of a Denis Wheatley book. I think it may be nonsense. Certainly the Sinason woman seems to have form for plugging this line.
That certainly raises some interesting questions...I wonder how the police feel looking into their own practices? it sounds like the IPCC are trying to distance themselves a bit though, at the end of the article, claiming no complaints towards the police in relation to him. If staff were close to him and agreed to favours that wouldn't normally be allowed, it should be investigated all the same, even if people don't complain about it, surely?
This also confused me a little bit:-
A decision not to inform the BBC that one of its most famous broadcasters was under investigation. It meant Savile was able to take part in BBC recordings in 2009, during which he committed his last recorded sexual assault.
do they mean 2006? the last TOTP was recorded in 2006 and I heard there was an allegation of an assault then but I haven't heard of him being on the BBC after that(?).
do they mean 2006? the last TOTP was recorded in 2006 and I heard there was an allegation of an assault then but I haven't heard of him being on the BBC after that(?).
Maybe some retrospective that he was on, perhaps on the radio rather than tv. Maybe not as the "headline" star.
Maybe some retrospective that he was on, perhaps on the radio rather than tv. Maybe not as the "headline" star.
There are many mentions of the girl and TOTP in 2006 and also many mentions of his last attack being in 2009, but no one mentions anything else about this attack in 2009.
I wonder if they are not getting mixed up with a report made in 2009 but of an older offence and him being interviewed in Oct 2009.
The satanic thing seems to be straight out of a Denis Wheatley book. I think it may be nonsense. Certainly the Sinason woman seems to have form for plugging this line.
I hope it is - it sounds very bizarre, to have a whole room or section of a hospital effectively cut off, with no lighting only candles etc. and what? staff knew not to go there and stayed quiet etc.? it seems particularly fantastical, for want of a better term. I certainly hope it wasn't the case.
Comments
Dr Sinason sits on the advisory council of Norwood:
http://www.norwood.org.uk/Who-we-are/people-roles/norwood-council/valerie-sinason
The President of Norwood is Richard Desmond "the Chairman of Northern & Shell (Publishers of the Express Group of Newspapers and OK! Magazine)":
http://www.norwood.org.uk/Who-we-are/people-roles
I suspect Sinason has a direct line to The Express, much like I suspect Mediawatch-UK has one to The Mail and Object does to The Guardian.
When the photo appeared, my first thought was that reminds me of Sherlock Holmes :eek: (lol) minus the deerstalker hat and its not a pipe. I guess its the shadow effect(?) *blinks* *cleans glasses*
Before I was 50/50 with that story. Now I don't believe him. The guy hit him? Did his chaperone and his scouts colleagues didn't find nothing amiss with the boy? Didn't they see the bruises? For how long he was out? It must have take at least 20 minutes. Didn't nobody noticed him absent? Why he has now come up with this story? He probable read Savile was capable of worse and also read the North Wales boy's story (being abused as Savile laugh).
I wish they stopped printing the Duncroft and Caroline Moore stories. Until everything is sorted out about what really happened there. And Caroline Moore seems to like talking to the press way too much.
That story appeared in 2001 ?
She says she was approached by two women in 1993 re satanic abuse by Jimmy Savile which was reported to police.
I wonder if that was mentioned to Jeremy Laurance.
It is also a sinister fact that since the Romanian Orphan promulgated scare, it has been the House of Windsor and friends all over the orphanages throughout Romania.
We then have Sir Elton John causing big promotion of the adoption industry, with Madonna and Jolie (that bird that kisses her brother like you do your partner) playing to the distasteful game of child kidnap, because it is he child's right...
Creepy people playing a creepy game, but of course the worst of it is in what they actually want, complete control over social services through their charitable trust fronts, in order they are the beneficiaries in all ways to those children removed from families.
In Romania ARK (Absolute Return for Kids) have been the main player in taking over Romanian social services and orphanages, the patron of ARK is Prince William. Here is a link to a great book by a friend of mine on the topic of Orphans in Romania :
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Talk:Schillings_legal_threat_re_Arpad_Busson,_EIM_Group_and_ARK_Schools_to_911forum.org.uk_hoster,_16_Dec_2008
In exposing their own networks they aim to take the lot through a serious deception, in that sense this thread has been a great plucker of information they don';t want in the mix.
Well done to you all.
You could be right. I thought of Fagin myself. It's an arty sort of photograph and would work in black and white retro silhouette or even shades of grey as the "eminence grise" he called himself. Actually just leave it as it is now and it already says that.
Liberty, also known as the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL) has been affiliated with the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) and Paedophile Action for Liberation.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/labour/4949555/Harriet-Harman-under-attack-over-bid-to-water-down-child-pornography-law.html
Miss Harman left NCCL in 1982 when she was elected MP for Camberwell and Peckham, by which time several members of PIE had been jailed for conspiracy to corrupt public morals. A spokesman for Miss Harman said: “She has always opposed child pornography and has never supported PIE and to suggest that she did is untrue and misleading. “NCCL’s approach to the protection of children’s bill was to argue for clear definitions in the bill to make sure the law was precise so that it was about child protection and not about censorship.” The spokesman added: “PIE had been excluded from the NCCL before she became legal officer.” However press cuttings from 1983 make it clear that it was still considered an “affiliate group”.
https://twitter.com/Channel4News/statuses/290463975320203265
Yes, thats a better comparison.
He looks a bit like Worzel Gummidge, doesn't he? And he's got such a big nose!
I remember reading a comment on youtube last year asking why he bothered to get a wart on his face removed, presumably inferring that he didn't seem too bothered about his looks otherwise, though im not sure how true that is(?). It wasn't mentioned in the biography, so I presume if he did get it taken off, that it wasn't due to any health issue, or it would have been documented? who knows.
Now you mention it. My husband agrees.
It's worth reading the comments at the end of the "Satanic ring" article!
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/78224-as-i-have-been-saying-jimmy-savile-was-part-of-a-satanic-ring-of-course-he-was-satanic-and-paedophile-rings-are-fundamentally-connected-for-all-the-reasons-my-books-and-talks-explain-see-wembley
and one of the conspiracy theory sites
http://aangirfan.blogspot.pt/2013/01/savile-satanist-links-to-security.html
Gillian Tett & Esther Rantzen
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01q16yp/The_Andrew_Marr_Show_13_01_2013/
One article they discuss is
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/features/9797466/Jimmy-Savile-I-said-he-was-a-healer.-He-was-a-destroyer.html
Eileen Fairweather on how she was taken in as a young journalist by JS.
It's a cracking article.
Worzel Gummidge
http://www.comp.dit.ie/dgordon/albion/annotations/albion6/Worzel.jpg
JS
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/130111-jimmy-savile-hmed-8a.photoblog600.jpg
or
http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article88788.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/image-12-for-jimmy-savile-life-in-pictures-gallery-677794346.jpg - peculiar photo found via Google Images...
Had not seen this - i think they are the first to name him. Mike Osman named by Star http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/292675/SAVILE-COPS-TARGET-7-MORE/ …
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/9797464/Did-Jimmy-Savile-fix-his-interrogation.html
That certainly raises some interesting questions...I wonder how the police feel looking into their own practices? it sounds like the IPCC are trying to distance themselves a bit though, at the end of the article, claiming no complaints towards the police in relation to him. If staff were close to him and agreed to favours that wouldn't normally be allowed, it should be investigated all the same, even if people don't complain about it, surely?
This also confused me a little bit:-
do they mean 2006? the last TOTP was recorded in 2006 and I heard there was an allegation of an assault then but I haven't heard of him being on the BBC after that(?).
Maybe some retrospective that he was on, perhaps on the radio rather than tv. Maybe not as the "headline" star.
There are many mentions of the girl and TOTP in 2006 and also many mentions of his last attack being in 2009, but no one mentions anything else about this attack in 2009.
I wonder if they are not getting mixed up with a report made in 2009 but of an older offence and him being interviewed in Oct 2009.
I hope it is - it sounds very bizarre, to have a whole room or section of a hospital effectively cut off, with no lighting only candles etc. and what? staff knew not to go there and stayed quiet etc.? it seems particularly fantastical, for want of a better term. I certainly hope it wasn't the case.