Queen benefits scrounger who should pay Bedroom Tax on her 700 spare rooms

RickyBarbyRickyBarby Posts: 5,902
Forum Member
The Queen is branded a benefits scrounger and Prince Philip a racist in a new BBC comedy tonight.

The Revolution Will Be Televised says the monarch should pay the Bedroom Tax because Buckingham Palace has “700 spare rooms


The jibes risk plunging the BBC into a new row with Tory MPs, who have already blasted the Corporation’s coverage of welfare cuts

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/bedroom-tax-queen-mocked-benefits-2801068
«13456711

Comments

  • Lil_MLil_M Posts: 2,105
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    RickyBarby wrote: »
    The Queen is branded a benefits scrounger and Prince Philip a racist in a new BBC comedy tonight.

    The Revolution Will Be Televised says the monarch should pay the Bedroom Tax because Buckingham Palace has “700 spare rooms


    The jibes risk plunging the BBC into a new row with Tory MPs, who have already blasted the Corporation’s coverage of welfare cuts

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/bedroom-tax-queen-mocked-benefits-2801068

    There is an element of truth to this.
    The royal family are just layabouts who have not contributed to this country financially even during the recession years.
    Whilst we cut benefits for the poor and force them into food banks, we provide fine food to Royals:rolleyes:
  • MustabusterMustabuster Posts: 5,975
    Forum Member
    Haven't we got enough people grabbing random bits of news and sticking it into a post so they can start a thread?

    What do you think? At least try and post without screwing up your links.
  • SULLASULLA Posts: 149,789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    Her Majesty is not on benefits. :rolleyes:
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 14,920
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Ironic use of the word new from Ricky.
  • Lil_MLil_M Posts: 2,105
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    SULLA wrote: »
    Her Majesty is not on benefits. :rolleyes:

    She doesn't go to the job centre to claim but she is living off the taxpayer.
  • James FrederickJames Frederick Posts: 53,184
    Forum Member
    SULLA wrote: »
    Her Majesty is not on benefits. :rolleyes:

    Who is her employer then and who pays her wages
  • tinshedtinshed Posts: 483
    Forum Member
    Who really cares.
  • TrollHunterTrollHunter Posts: 12,496
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Ricky my little cherub. If you're going to start a thread which is intended to provoke debate, it's good form to kick proceedings off with your viewpoint, otherwise you're doing nothing more than posting a link to a news story. And you even failed on posting the link part, so really, what is the actual point of your thread?
  • spookyLXspookyLX Posts: 11,730
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    RickyBarby wrote: »
    The Queen is branded a benefits scrounger and Prince Philip a racist in a new BBC comedy tonight.

    The Revolution Will Be Televised says the monarch should pay the Bedroom Tax because Buckingham Palace has “700 spare rooms


    The jibes risk plunging the BBC into a new row with Tory MPs, who have already blasted the Corporation’s coverage of welfare cuts

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/bedroom-tax-queen-mocked-benefits-2801068

    But everyone knows she does not own Buck house so the ' sketch' is pointless and shows just how thick some people are
  • spookyLXspookyLX Posts: 11,730
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Lil_M wrote: »
    There is an element of truth to this.
    The royal family are just layabouts who have not contributed to this country financially even during the recession years.
    Whilst we cut benefits for the poor and force them into food banks, we provide fine food to Royals:rolleyes:

    Thats why The Crown estates have to give more than half it's yearly profits to the government so saying they do not contribute is false :rolleyes:
  • lemoncurdlemoncurd Posts: 57,778
    Forum Member
    Are there really 700 rooms in Buckingham Palace? It doesn't seem *that* big! :confused:
  • stoatiestoatie Posts: 78,106
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Branding Prince Philip a racist's not exactly the cutting edge of new and daring comedy, is it? What next? "New BBC show causes uproar by criticising the nation's mothers-in-law"?
  • RickyBarbyRickyBarby Posts: 5,902
    Forum Member
    lemoncurd wrote: »
    Are there really 700 rooms in Buckingham Palace? It doesn't seem *that* big! :confused:

    its sicking how many room is in it,
  • TrollHunterTrollHunter Posts: 12,496
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    lemoncurd wrote: »
    Are there really 700 rooms in Buckingham Palace? It doesn't seem *that* big! :confused:

    There are actually 775!
  • stoatiestoatie Posts: 78,106
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    RickyBarby wrote: »
    its sicking how many room is in it,

    I'm pretty sure the size of the building itself isn't what the comedians are complaining about...
  • kippehkippeh Posts: 6,655
    Forum Member
    RickyBarby wrote: »
    its sicking how many room is in it,

    Dafuq?
  • zx50zx50 Posts: 91,269
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    SULLA wrote: »
    Her Majesty is not on benefits. :rolleyes:

    Her Majesty? Are you a royalist? I just call her the Queen.
  • TrollHunterTrollHunter Posts: 12,496
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Ricky, you still haven't stated what the point of your thread is.
    The edgy 'new' comedy series (actually second series, so not really new) claims the Queen should pay bedroom tax on Buck Palace (even though she doesn't own it) and Prince Phillip is a racist (which everyone knows anyway).

    Is your thread intended to mock the epic fail of the content of the show or are you particularly gullible/stupid/naive and think the creators of the show (Heydon Prowse & Jolyon Rubinstein) are actually onto something 'revolutionary' here?
  • AneechikAneechik Posts: 20,208
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Only on DS is there confusion between benefits and a job.
  • lemoncurdlemoncurd Posts: 57,778
    Forum Member
    Who is her employer then and who pays her wages

    She's self-employed.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,334
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    She will not be amused.
  • James FrederickJames Frederick Posts: 53,184
    Forum Member
    The edgy 'new' comedy series (actually second series, so not really new) claims the Queen should pay bedroom tax on Buck Palace (even though she doesn't own it)

    Isn't that the whole point the fact she doesn't own it and is more a tenant of a state owned house
  • woot_whoowoot_whoo Posts: 18,030
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    spookyLX wrote: »
    Thats why The Crown estates have to give more than half it's yearly profits to the government so saying they do not contribute is false :rolleyes:

    The Crown Estates aren't the Windsors, as is pointed out in every damn thread about the royals. They are not contributing or sacrificing Crown Estate revenue - and if they tried to claim it as their own, they'd have to take on the much larger funding of the state.
  • TrollHunterTrollHunter Posts: 12,496
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Isn't that the whole point the fact she doesn't own it and is more a tenant of a state owned house

    But she's not a benefit claimant so won't pay bedroom tax :confused:
  • irishguyirishguy Posts: 22,172
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    But she's not a benefit claimant so won't pay bedroom tax :confused:

    I guess they're saying the money the royals get from the taxpayer is effectively a benefit payment.... Doesn't really add up though as its not as though ER spends her day filling out job applications and watching daytime TV
Sign In or Register to comment.