But not to all: on clicking the link, I am greeted with a message saying, "Vopiscus, you do not have permission to access this page," and giving possible reasons for this, of which the first (and most cogent) is "The thread or post you are trying to view may have been removed in line with our terms and conditions."
So I'm as much in the dark as ever.
[Incidentally, as this is apparently a reply to my entry earlier today on another thread, it would have been better to post it there, rather than start a new thread on what is essentially the same subject.]
Im thinking that the thread was closed down as it was promoting a personal work! Although the site wasnt asking for money so I dont see what DSs fuss with it was?
I'm reluctant to believe that the mods have time to sit around and read every thread and monitor it.
Rather, I imagine that DS has some code constantly running in the background looking for patterns in a thread, like for example when a link to the same website is posted many times by different posts in the same thread, this would trigger an auto delete of the thread in case it's promotion of some kind.
e.g. like Junk Mail - you often get junk mail saying something like .... click on this link to improve you *%*^ life, and then another email with different words with the same link and so on and on. Therefore DS has a junk mail type filter running which tries to detect frequent posts to the same website in a thread especially if its the same person posting them.
I'm reluctant to believe that the mods have time to sit around and read every thread and monitor it.
Rather, I imagine that DS has some code constantly running in the background looking for patterns in a thread, like for example when a link to the same website is posted many times by different posts in the same thread, this would trigger an auto delete of the thread in case it's promotion of some kind.
e.g. like Junk Mail - you often get junk mail saying something like .... click on this link to improve you *%*^ life, and then another email with different words with the same link and so on and on. Therefore DS has a junk mail type filter running which tries to detect frequent posts to the same website in a thread especially if its the same person posting them.
Actually I received a bit of abuse when I joined this forum: I post too much, I start too many threads, I make personal and not Dr Who related posts....
I guess I have a bit of sympathy for Capaldi_Capaldi. I think if he is a genuine 13 yr old kid who loves Doctor Who who are we to stop him posting too many times? He's a young kid yet he loves the "so called" too old actor for the role Mr. Capaldi, so how's that posters who claim Capldis' casting was a bad thing for the youth? He is also full of enthusiasm and has kept the forum busy recently. We don't have to like every post here whether they're mine or his or anyone elses, but atleast there are posts
On the flip side, the discrepencaies in his age - why have a facebook account with the wrong age? I also found it quite interesting that there is a sci fi author for teens who has publicly gone on record to defend Steven Moffat (i.e. clearly is a Doctor Who fan) called Jack Heath - and Capald_Capaldis' website has the words Jack Heath in the domain ....
I'm a judge, I need to see all the facts before I make a final judgement
So really, if you're genuine - good on you Capaldi_Capaldi. If not, just let us know, you're posts have been ok, I won't be too upset, just want the truth.
Actually I received a bit of abuse when I joined this forum: I post too much, I start too many threads, I make personal and not Dr Who related posts.....
Yeah, sorry about that.
I was burned by James Vick and Fyffes.
But I think Capaldi_Capaldi could answer a lot of his/her questions via the magic of Google, or even clicking Page 2 of this forum.
Someone else posted that CC starts threads, but doesn't participate in them, which I also find kinda annoying.
On the flip side, the discrepencaies in his age - why have a facebook account with the wrong age?
I may be wrong but I believe that Facebook has a minimum age for people to sign up, so if you are below that age you would add a few years simply to be able to join the site...
I may be wrong but I believe that Facebook has a minimum age for people to sign up, so if you are below that age you would add a few years simply to be able to join the site...
Quite. I can entirely understand the OP's lying to Facebook; what I don't understand is why he is making these contradictory statements to us.
Actually I received a bit of abuse when I joined this forum: I post too much, I start too many threads, I make personal and not Dr Who related posts....
I guess I have a bit of sympathy for Capaldi_Capaldi. I think if he is a genuine 13 yr old kid who loves Doctor Who who are we to stop him posting too many times? He's a young kid yet he loves the "so called" too old actor for the role Mr. Capaldi, so how's that posters who claim Capldis' casting was a bad thing for the youth? He is also full of enthusiasm and has kept the forum busy recently. We don't have to like every post here whether they're mine or his or anyone elses, but atleast there are posts
On the flip side, the discrepencaies in his age - why have a facebook account with the wrong age? I also found it quite interesting that there is a sci fi author for teens who has publicly gone on record to defend Steven Moffat (i.e. clearly is a Doctor Who fan) called Jack Heath - and Capald_Capaldis' website has the words Jack Heath in the domain ....
I'm a judge, I need to see all the facts before I make a final judgement
So really, if you're genuine - good on you Capaldi_Capaldi. If not, just let us know, you're posts have been ok, I won't be too upset, just want the truth.[/QUOTE
I also found it quite interesting that there is a sci fi author for teens who has publicly gone on record to defend Steven Moffat (i.e. clearly is a Doctor Who fan) called Jack Heath - and Capald_Capaldis' website has the words Jack Heath in the domain ....
The domain name includes "jackheathcot6": but since Heathcot is a genuine surname in its own right, I think you're barking up the wrong tree here (even if Capaldi_Capaldi is 19 rather than 13, he would have to be an infant prodigy to have written Jack Heath's earliest published works).
I may be wrong but I believe that Facebook has a minimum age for people to sign up, so if you are below that age you would add a few years simply to be able to join the site...
"How old do you have to be to sign up for Facebook?
To be eligible to sign up for Facebook, you must be at least 13 years old."
And to be clear, I've got nothing against Capaldi_Capaldi. Like I've said, I quite like the fact he's keeping the forum busy and for his age he has good passion for Doctor Who. I'm just curious about weirdness in his profile.:cool:
The domain name includes "jackheathcot6": but since Heathcot is a genuine surname in its own right, I think you're barking up the wrong tree here (even if Capaldi_Capaldi is 19 rather than 13, he would have to be an infant prodigy to have written Jack Heath's earliest published works).
True, I did wonder about this too, especially as Jack Heath is based in Australia and even with the best will in the world he would struggle to post to this forum at the times that Capaldi_Capaldi does.
just a note to Capaldi_Capaldi - digital identity is precious, you may want to look at some url name provide to protect your real name.
I'd be careful flying that around as a insult, some people may find it a little degrading....
Sorry completely unrelated, just quite a close topic to me.
I'd be careful flying that around as a insult, some people may find it a little degrading....
Sorry completely unrelated, just quite a close topic to me.
It wasn't used as an insult. It described the posting style of a certain forum member. In the same way as one could describe someone's posting style as 'schizophrenic'. It doesn't mean they are insulting or denigrating anyone who suffers from that illness.
Its a shame if you were offended. I wasn't. So it all balances out doesn't it.
It wasn't used as an insult. It described the posting style of a certain forum member. In the same way as one could describe someone's posting style as 'schizophrenic'. It doesn't mean they are insulting or denigrating anyone who suffers from that illness.
Its a shame if you were offended. I wasn't. So it all balances out doesn't it.
Capaldi_Capaldi
Posts: 227
Comments
But not to all: on clicking the link, I am greeted with a message saying, "Vopiscus, you do not have permission to access this page," and giving possible reasons for this, of which the first (and most cogent) is "The thread or post you are trying to view may have been removed in line with our terms and conditions."
So I'm as much in the dark as ever.
[Incidentally, as this is apparently a reply to my entry earlier today on another thread, it would have been better to post it there, rather than start a new thread on what is essentially the same subject.]
Anyway the site still exists so Im posting it (as I have nothing to do with the site): http://jackheathcot6.wix.com/doctorwhothesite#!about2/ct9r
Rather, I imagine that DS has some code constantly running in the background looking for patterns in a thread, like for example when a link to the same website is posted many times by different posts in the same thread, this would trigger an auto delete of the thread in case it's promotion of some kind.
e.g. like Junk Mail - you often get junk mail saying something like .... click on this link to improve you *%*^ life, and then another email with different words with the same link and so on and on. Therefore DS has a junk mail type filter running which tries to detect frequent posts to the same website in a thread especially if its the same person posting them.
BTW - Capaldi_Capaldi - not that I'm paranoid, but are you really this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Heath
He is Professor Yana.
We should all be afraid.
lol
Actually I received a bit of abuse when I joined this forum: I post too much, I start too many threads, I make personal and not Dr Who related posts....
I guess I have a bit of sympathy for Capaldi_Capaldi. I think if he is a genuine 13 yr old kid who loves Doctor Who who are we to stop him posting too many times? He's a young kid yet he loves the "so called" too old actor for the role Mr. Capaldi, so how's that posters who claim Capldis' casting was a bad thing for the youth? He is also full of enthusiasm and has kept the forum busy recently. We don't have to like every post here whether they're mine or his or anyone elses, but atleast there are posts
On the flip side, the discrepencaies in his age - why have a facebook account with the wrong age? I also found it quite interesting that there is a sci fi author for teens who has publicly gone on record to defend Steven Moffat (i.e. clearly is a Doctor Who fan) called Jack Heath - and Capald_Capaldis' website has the words Jack Heath in the domain ....
I'm a judge, I need to see all the facts before I make a final judgement
So really, if you're genuine - good on you Capaldi_Capaldi. If not, just let us know, you're posts have been ok, I won't be too upset, just want the truth.
Yeah, sorry about that.
I was burned by James Vick and Fyffes.
But I think Capaldi_Capaldi could answer a lot of his/her questions via the magic of Google, or even clicking Page 2 of this forum.
Someone else posted that CC starts threads, but doesn't participate in them, which I also find kinda annoying.
It's all a bit ADHD.
But, ya know, I'm being a grumpy sod
I may be wrong but I believe that Facebook has a minimum age for people to sign up, so if you are below that age you would add a few years simply to be able to join the site...
(Anyone see what I've done there
Quite. I can entirely understand the OP's lying to Facebook; what I don't understand is why he is making these contradictory statements to us.
The domain name includes "jackheathcot6": but since Heathcot is a genuine surname in its own right, I think you're barking up the wrong tree here (even if Capaldi_Capaldi is 19 rather than 13, he would have to be an infant prodigy to have written Jack Heath's earliest published works).
You are wrong:
https://www.facebook.com/help/210*****5634222
"How old do you have to be to sign up for Facebook?
To be eligible to sign up for Facebook, you must be at least 13 years old."
And to be clear, I've got nothing against Capaldi_Capaldi. Like I've said, I quite like the fact he's keeping the forum busy and for his age he has good passion for Doctor Who. I'm just curious about weirdness in his profile.:cool:
True, I did wonder about this too, especially as Jack Heath is based in Australia and even with the best will in the world he would struggle to post to this forum at the times that Capaldi_Capaldi does.
just a note to Capaldi_Capaldi - digital identity is precious, you may want to look at some url name provide to protect your real name.
Yeah Gris, you were mean to me, I'm still crying inside
So, if Capaldi_Capaldi joined Facebook (which does have a minimum age, i.e. 13) before 21/10/2013, he would have had to lie about his age.
Plus the script samples he keeps blessing us with possess no evidence of writing talent?
I'd be careful flying that around as a insult, some people may find it a little degrading....
Sorry completely unrelated, just quite a close topic to me.
It wasn't used as an insult. It described the posting style of a certain forum member. In the same way as one could describe someone's posting style as 'schizophrenic'. It doesn't mean they are insulting or denigrating anyone who suffers from that illness.
Its a shame if you were offended. I wasn't. So it all balances out doesn't it.
And what describes an ADHD posting style?