Options
Moon landings......true or false??
mtecally
Posts: 111 Forum Member
✭
just been chatting about the 1969 moon landings l .one giant leep
etc...
i had never put much thought into it but having looked at some evidence it seems like a huge hoax..
what do you think???
etc...
i had never put much thought into it but having looked at some evidence it seems like a huge hoax..
what do you think???
0
Comments
Clue: Search for the 101 other threads we have about this every year and all will be revealed.
They couldn't be bothered.
that link gives a few pointers but generally
we still have no way of landing a craft on the moon and being able to take off again without 18mths prep.
the flag blowing even without any atmosphere.
pictures show two shadows....where from......possibly studio lighting.../it was the 60s...
neil armstong is very old...its time he told the trth..
Why bother? You've lost the political race and there really isn't anything else there worth the investment. They used unmanned probes for the science.
Tell me how it was possible in 1969?????????
ohh because the cold war was all just an illusion to keep us all in line obviously. We are being controlled be shape shifting lizards after all, lets not forget that.
What sort of a question is that? lol. The space shuttle is a design over 40 years old. Does it still not run?
Funny how you don't apply this same logic to, the visual special effects used to create this hoax, which I think is a far more valid technical question.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGrYndBurq8
very good point......never seen it from that angle....maybe they us had a media machine in overdrive and the russian voice was never heard given the iron curtain of the 60s
Again, this really is, for me, the fundamental question for anyone who thinks it was a hoax to answer. And it's the one they all seem to avoid. If you can give me a reasonable answer as to why the Russians agreed to hush up the 'hoax', you'd have my thanks for ever.
the space race at the time time of the moon landings and prior to them was political dynamite the usa lost face as they put it "to a nation that cant build a freekin refrigerator"
when kennedy propossed a moon landing it was met with shock from nasa and the world considering america had only put a craft in orbit for 12 minutes and 1 in 3 rockets exploded on the launch pad .
he set a deadline of 10 years for a moon landing .
prior to the moonshot there was practice launches that covered docking ,re entry , manual guidance etc some of the practice sessions resulted in mistakes like landing off course using to much fuel false reports from instruments
and one near fatal mis launch .
the final moon launch used a stripped down version of its original design and went without flaw something most of the previous missions into space had not been so fortunate to experience .
politically the moon landings boosted western confidence and dented russias .
What's your point? This is what I'm saying. After Apollo 12 hardly anyone in America cared about going to the moon anymore. Infact so much so news channels didn't even carry Apollo 13's launch untill it went wrong.Therefore if they were a hoax or all about moral boosting, they would have cut them a long time before. Yet they carried on till 17,but had planned till 20. I would say cutting their ties early makes America look bad on the world stage, which doesn't fo much for moral.
Also why send a geologist in the form of Harrison Schmitt up there, if he's not going to be apart of 'the show' and make a discovery to boost 'ratings'/moral.