Options

Study: Fox News Viewers 'More Likely' to Believe False Political Information

TheEngineerTheEngineer Posts: 7,789
Forum Member
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/study-fox-news-viewers-false-61343?goback=.gde_868697_news_297420097
Those who watch the right-leaning channel also believe the stimulus caused job losses, their income taxes have gone up and scientists don't think climate change is occurring.

A new study reports that Fox News viewers are "significantly more likely" to believe false information about political issues.

To be "fair and balanced" it also goes on to list what viewers of other channels believe.
«134567

Comments

  • Options
    BundymanBundyman Posts: 7,199
    Forum Member
    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/study-fox-news-viewers-false-61343?goback=.gde_868697_news_297420097



    To be "fair and balanced" it also goes on to list what viewers of other channels believe.

    Yet another FOX bashing thread then

    For the millionth time, FOX News has a few (That's a few) shows where anchors give their opinion. All the others present straight news.

    Don't suppose that will stop some believing it's all biased or posting a link to that Outfoxed rubbish to try & prove their point though
  • Options
    ElMarkoElMarko Posts: 5,224
    Forum Member
    That's bullshit mate, people have leaked internal editorial directives which were network-wide.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,230
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Bundyman wrote: »
    Yet another FOX bashing thread then

    For the millionth time, FOX News has a few (That's a few) shows where anchors give their opinion. All the others present straight news.

    Don't suppose that will stop some believing it's all biased or posting a link to that Outfoxed rubbish to try & prove their point though

    Please show where the OP's report about Fox News viewers is false. Because if you can, you're welcome to say it's Fox bashing. I suspect you can't though.

    Also, please point out the false information in Outfoxed, because again, you can only rubbish it if its rubbish. Evidence or stfu.
  • Options
    TelevisionUserTelevisionUser Posts: 41,417
    Forum Member
    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/study-fox-news-viewers-false-61343?goback=.gde_868697_news_297420097

    To be "fair and balanced" it also goes on to list what viewers of other channels believe.

    That is shocking and it's an indictment of the lack of critical thinking (and intellect) of those who watch these channels and these pernicious channels themselves which confuse news and comment and also present slanted news stories a la Russia Today.
  • Options
    spiney2spiney2 Posts: 27,058
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I don't understand why anyone watches such stuff. I also don't understand why anyone reads the Sun ........no news, not entertaining, just titillation ....
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,727
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Bundyman wrote: »
    Yet another FOX bashing thread then

    For the millionth time, FOX News has a few (That's a few) shows where anchors give their opinion. All the others present straight news.

    Don't suppose that will stop some believing it's all biased or posting a link to that Outfoxed rubbish to try & prove their point though

    i recall the daily show pretty much tearing that apart awhile ago, showing some pretty biased stuff during "news hours."

    also this recent 9/11 healthcare bill and there lack of coverage (plus lack of blame to the republicans ) especially when compared to there over of the mosque near ground zero is a disgrace.

    anyone who watches fox news for any other reason than to laugh or see how not to make the news needs there head looking at imo
  • Options
    Paul89Paul89 Posts: 235
    Forum Member
    Bundyman wrote: »
    Yet another FOX bashing thread then

    For the millionth time, FOX News has a few (That's a few) shows where anchors give their opinion. All the others present straight news.

    Don't suppose that will stop some believing it's all biased or posting a link to that Outfoxed rubbish to try & prove their point though

    Saying something a million times doesn't make it any more true or any less stupid. It is, however, a favourite tactic of Fox News.
  • Options
    mad_dudemad_dude Posts: 10,670
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Study: Digital Spy Readers 'More Likely' to Believe False Political Information

    If the politics section is anything to go by.
  • Options
    JohnbeeJohnbee Posts: 4,019
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It is not true that all right wing people are stupid, but it is undoubtedly true that most stupid people are right wing.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 993
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Johnbee wrote: »
    It is not true that all right wing people are stupid, but it is undoubtedly true that most stupid people are right wing.

    Is that why we have the money, and the poor are Labour voters? :D
  • Options
    rcman2rcman2 Posts: 181
    Forum Member
    The study does talk about FNC but the story here is how true that old adage is about getting too much of a good thing can be bad for you.

    "The more a person watched and read the news, the less likely they were to have been misled about the facts. But “there were however a number of cases where greater exposure to a news source increased misinformation on a specific issue,” the study’s authors wrote. In particular, they found that regular viewers of the Fox News Channel, which tilts to the right in prime time, were significantly more likely to believe untruths about the Democratic health care overhaul, climate change and other subjects.

    The study found other cases where greater exposure to media meant greater misinformation on a subject. Regular viewers of MSNBC, which tilts to the left in prime time, were 34 percentage points more likely than nonviewers to believe “that it was proven that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce was spending money raised from foreign sources to support Republican candidates.” Consumers of public broadcasting were 25 points more likely to believe the same."

    http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/17/study-some-viewers-were-misinformed-by-tv-news/#more-52445

    The perfect recipe for cattle voters. :(
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 8,681
    Forum Member
    Bundyman wrote: »
    For the millionth time, FOX News has a few (That's a few) shows where anchors give their opinion. All the others present straight news.

    Don't suppose that will stop some believing it's all biased or posting a link to that Outfoxed rubbish to try & prove their point though

    Get real, the entire network is biased.

    All of the news stories are critical of the democrats, all of the anchors support the Republican's policies and the anchors air their personal approval of those policies, most of the guests they have on the channel are republican politicians, right wing celebrities and people from right wing think tanks. Whenever there are left wing people on the channel they are spoken to very rudely, routinely interrupted and in some cases shouted out. They have republican politicians who are payed by Fox News as pundits (eg. Sarah Palin) and they also fund conservative/republican meetings and campaigns.

    To say that only a few air their personal opinions with the rest of the news being balanced is completely bogus.
  • Options
    RagnarokRagnarok Posts: 4,655
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    EuroChris wrote: »
    Get real, the entire network is biased.

    All of the news stories are critical of the democrats, all of the anchors support the Republican's policies and the anchors air their personal approval of those policies, most of the guests they have on the channel are republican politicians, right wing celebrities and people from right wing think tanks. Whenever there are left wing people on the channel they are spoken to very rudely, routinely interrupted and in some cases shouted out. They have republican politicians who are payed by Fox News as pundits (eg. Sarah Palin) and they also fund conservative/republican meetings and campaigns.

    To say that only a few air their personal opinions with the rest of the news being balanced is completely bogus.


    Ah so that's why Mr Colmes has his own show on Fox News, he's a Democrat supporter on the whole.

    At the end of that day, before Fox News came along there was a gaping hole in the market with most news outlets and all tv news channels being left leaning over there. Good old Rupie saw the gap and has made a killing, as he usually does.

    you can trust greed and you know with Murdoch It's all about the $$$.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 993
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    EuroChris wrote: »
    Get real, the entire network is biased.

    All of the news stories are critical of the democrats, all of the anchors support the Republican's policies and the anchors air their personal approval of those policies, most of the guests they have on the channel are republican politicians, right wing celebrities and people from right wing think tanks. Whenever there are left wing people on the channel they are spoken to very rudely, routinely interrupted and in some cases shouted out. They have republican politicians who are payed by Fox News as pundits (eg. Sarah Palin) and they also fund conservative/republican meetings and campaigns.

    To say that only a few air their personal opinions with the rest of the news being balanced is completely bogus.

    And so is the BBC utterly Bias in everything it does.

    From Homosexual propaganda, to promoting the green agenda, Obabama love ins to blatant socialist biased views and love for the EU project.

    What BBC lovers hate, really hate about Fox, is it reminds them how Biased the BBC is too. The BBC and Fox are two cheeks of the same arse. Both as bad as each other.

    Just look at yourslef. A screaming left winger, who loves the BBC< but can see no bias in the BBC? Jeeze man, look in the mirror for once and see what we all see.

    You and the BBC are as Biased as Fox news. We can all see it, so grow up and accept it. Stop trying to pretend the BBC is wonderful and level playing field, it is not.

    I watch neither, so am better than that. :)
  • Options
    CharnhamCharnham Posts: 61,394
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Superior wrote: »
    What BBC lovers hate, really hate about Fox, is it reminds them how Biased the BBC is too. The BBC and Fox are two cheeks of the same arse. Both as bad as each other.
    yes, you are quite correct I watch this and I am reminded of this.
  • Options
    derek500derek500 Posts: 24,892
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Superior wrote: »
    And so is the BBC utterly Bias in everything it does.

    From Homosexual propaganda, to promoting the green agenda, Obabama love ins to blatant socialist biased views and love for the EU project.

    ....and tuition fees. The number of times I've heard presenters and commentators saying 'tripled' and '£9,000', both of which are inaccurate and/or misleading.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,230
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    derek500 wrote: »
    ....and tuition fees. The number of times I've heard presenters and commentators saying 'tripled' and '£9,000', both of which are inaccurate and/or misleading.

    Considering those are the figures quoted in all other UK news coverage, including commercial TV mews and all newspapers, accusing the BBC alone of bias in this regard is more than a little disingenuous.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,230
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Superior wrote: »
    From Homosexual propaganda, to promoting the green agenda, Obabama love ins to blatant socialist biased views and love for the EU project.

    'Homosexual propaganda' - really? Evidence please. Unless you're confusing the notion of what propaganda actually is with some dramas featuring homosexual characters. If it's simply the latter, then your comment says more about you than the BBC.

    "Promoting the green agenda"? Ah, do you mean reporting scientific concensus? Right-ho.

    In fact evidence for the rest of that sentence as well.
  • Options
    MickeyBricksMickeyBricks Posts: 1,719
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    derek500 wrote: »
    ....and tuition fees. The number of times I've heard presenters and commentators saying 'tripled' and '£9,000', both of which are inaccurate and/or misleading.

    And the reporter on BBC News yesterday subtley pointing out that the weather was disrupting many people's "festive shopping":rolleyes: That'll be Christmas shopping to normal people then.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,230
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    And the reporter on BBC News yesterday subtley pointing out that the weather was disrupting many people's "festive shopping":rolleyes: That'll be Christmas shopping to normal people then.

    Gosh, are they not mentioning Christmas at all? Because I was watching the BBC Breakfast this morning as I got ready for work, and I could have sworn there were repeated uses of the word 'Christmas' in a number of different stories.

    But you're right. One use of the word 'Festive' must be a salvo in the continuing BBC socialist pinko politically correct War On Christmas.
  • Options
    ek-ukek-uk Posts: 2,395
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    And the reporter on BBC News yesterday subtley pointing out that the weather was disrupting many people's "festive shopping":rolleyes: That'll be Christmas shopping to normal people then.

    You know if I had been watching I really wouldn't have noticed that piece of blatant political corectness. I hadn't realised that everyone using the term festive was pandering to ethnic minorities. Thanks for pointing out. ;)
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 8,718
    Forum Member
    ElMarko wrote: »
    That's bullshit mate, people have leaked internal editorial directives which were network-wide.

    Link please?
  • Options
    mikwmikw Posts: 48,715
    Forum Member
    Superior wrote: »

    I watch neither, so am better than that. :)

    Yes, we can tell you watch neither!:D

    BBC is impartial, Fox isn't........ Simples.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 8,681
    Forum Member
    Superior wrote: »
    From Homosexual propaganda, to promoting the green agenda, Obabama love ins to blatant socialist biased views and love for the EU project.

    I think you should start watching Fox News because they sing from the same hymn sheet you do^.

    What on earth has the BBC got to do with it. :confused: The BBC isn't biased at all. Maybe some people think that it is biased due to the fact that there is such a strong right wing media in this country, the neutral BBC looks biased because it has to be critical to all sides and some right-wing people aren't used to having their political ideaology questioned.

    Please don't make assumptions about me from my post. That's like me making the assumption that you're a typical angry conservative who has a chip on their shoulder. But that wouldn't be true would it. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.