Options

CONFIRMED: Workfare IS used in order to avoid paying a wage as Homebase poster shows

DiazDiaz Posts: 220
Forum Member
Homebase poster here: http://www.boycottworkfare.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/homebase-workfare.jpg

This poster, leaked yesterday from Haringey Homebase, shows exactly how employers view workfare: an easy way to cut the wages bill. Homebase claim “We ensure they work alongside, not replace, paid colleagues”, but a staff member has told us that since tens of workfare placements were brought in, overtime has been cut for everyone. Some people’s hours have been cut from 48 down to 8 – far below the threshold for Working Tax Credits – because that is all they are contracted for.

It turns out 750 hours with no payroll costs – the figure for just one week in just one of Homebase’s 342 stores – does have a massive impact on the paid work available. Apparently it’s an effect that is popular with the regional manager, who we’ve heard has been trying to get all Homebase stores in her region to use workfare, and has been suspending or moving managers who don’t.

Full article here:

http://www.boycottworkfare.org/?p=2404

Guardian article also:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/apr/06/homebase-criticised-work-experience-claims

Contact Homebase:

On Facebook: www.facebook.com/homebase
On Twitter: Tweet to @homebase_uk
By email: order.enquiries@homebase.co.uk or info@homebase.co.uk or enquiries@homebase.co.uk
By phone: 0845 077 8888 or 0845 601 6911

Or contact the company they are owned by: http://www.homeretailgroup.com/contact-us/
«134567

Comments

  • Options
    finkfink Posts: 2,364
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    :mad::mad::mad: I'm furious at this!

    I hope they pass those cost savings onto the customers!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,324
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I'm literally shaking with anger at this news :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
  • Options
    Big Boy BarryBig Boy Barry Posts: 35,391
    Forum Member
    fink wrote: »
    :mad::mad::mad: I'm furious at this!

    I hope they pass those cost savings onto the customers!

    Yeah I'm sure they'll do that
  • Options
    Biffo the BearBiffo the Bear Posts: 25,859
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Don't forget that they also receive £2,275 per individual who they take on. I was interviewing the other week and this lad showed me a card that the job centre had given him saying something along the lines of "Get up to £2,275 if you take on this person for work experience at no cost to your business."
  • Options
    chinchinchinchin Posts: 125,853
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    These people are scum. No more, no less.
  • Options
    finkfink Posts: 2,364
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yeah I'm sure they'll do that

    Then I'm literally trembling with anger as I write this :mad::mad::mad::mad:
  • Options
    ackeracker Posts: 8,809
    Forum Member
    fink wrote: »
    :mad::mad::mad: I'm furious at this!

    I hope they pass those cost savings onto the customers!

    They dont deserve customers.
  • Options
    tghe-retfordtghe-retford Posts: 26,449
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The one thing I can take away from this is that it verifies everything I knew about workfare - corporate welfare where employers take advantage of taking on people for 0p an hour and labour which is subsidised by the taxpayer.

    Even with the Government promise to cull "red tape", cut the minimum wage, cut welfare for working people and other ways to cut the costs of employing people (at the expense of employees pay and rights), workfare will still trump the lot of them.
  • Options
    Uk LtdUk Ltd Posts: 1,228
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I'm literally shuddering, rocking back and forth, while sweating profusely, with furious uncontrollable rage right now :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
  • Options
    DiazDiaz Posts: 220
    Forum Member
    Please use social media to raise awareness about the issue.

    http://www.boycottworkfare.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/homebase-workfare.jpg
  • Options
    Auntie ClimaxAuntie Climax Posts: 917
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    People didn't already know this? Of course employers use it to save money on their payroll. At least this poster, if it's real, makes it public.
  • Options
    Uk LtdUk Ltd Posts: 1,228
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    chinchin wrote: »
    These people are scum. No more, no less.

    A bit harsh, but I agree. These folk have been on benefits long enough, this is a good way to make them do something for all the benefits already paid, while getting valuable work experience for their CV with one of the country's leading paint retailers.

    Good on homebase for accommodating so many of these folk in each store :)
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,095
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    What's the problem?
  • Options
    Biffo the BearBiffo the Bear Posts: 25,859
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    geniusgirl wrote: »
    What's the problem?

    If companies want to employ people, they should be paying them a wage appropriate to their hours.
  • Options
    Si_CreweSi_Crewe Posts: 40,202
    Forum Member
    Did this really warrant an entirely new thread?
  • Options
    NoseyLouieNoseyLouie Posts: 5,651
    Forum Member
    Well the hard working tax payer moaning about people claiming benefits with 'their' money can't complain now surely, as this is much more fairer and cheaper surely?

    ;)

    Urghhh....
  • Options
    Uk LtdUk Ltd Posts: 1,228
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Diaz wrote: »
    Homebase poster here: http://www.boycottworkfare.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/homebase-workfare.jpg

    This poster, leaked yesterday from Haringey Homebase, shows exactly how employers view workfare: an easy way to cut the wages bill. Homebase claim “We ensure they work alongside, not replace, paid colleagues”, but a staff member has told us that since tens of workfare placements were brought in, overtime has been cut for everyone. Some people’s hours have been cut from 48 down to 8 – far below the threshold for Working Tax Credits – because that is all they are contracted for.

    It turns out 750 hours with no payroll costs – the figure for just one week in just one of Homebase’s 342 stores – does have a massive impact on the paid work available. Apparently it’s an effect that is popular with the regional manager, who we’ve heard has been trying to get all Homebase stores in her region to use workfare, and has been suspending or moving managers who don’t.

    Full article here:

    http://www.boycottworkfare.org/?p=2404

    Guardian article also:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/apr/06/homebase-criticised-work-experience-claims

    Contact Homebase:

    On Facebook: www.facebook.com/homebase
    On Twitter: Tweet to @homebase_uk
    By email: order.enquiries@homebase.co.uk or info@homebase.co.uk or enquiries@homebase.co.uk
    By phone: 0845 077 8888 or 0845 601 6911

    Or contact the company they are owned by: http://www.homeretailgroup.com/contact-us/

    Could I hazard a guess here, that you work for Homebase, and are on an 8hr contract and now receive no overtime? Of course you'll deny it, but you seem passionate and very knowledgable about the local regional activities of the company.

    Anyone working 48 hours while on an 8hr contract is a mug. Does the working time directive not limit you to 47.5? And if you consistently worked those hours, they should be asking for a contract extension so they don't miss out with crappy holiday pay.

    Anyway, it's all not worth debating, homebase is ready for the retail scrap heap. If this cheap labour can keep folk in work a bit longer, then I'm all for it.
  • Options
    DiazDiaz Posts: 220
    Forum Member
    Si_Crewe wrote: »
    Did this really warrant an entirely new thread?

    How long were you banned for?
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It's more than obvious they all do this.

    It's the ones who try and defend it who deserve the most contempt.
  • Options
    Ancient IDTVAncient IDTV Posts: 10,175
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Instead of doing that, maybe people on JSA could do a few hours of work experience in the job centre itself, so they're actually taught how to work as a job centre member of staff.
  • Options
    Si_CreweSi_Crewe Posts: 40,202
    Forum Member
    Diaz wrote: »
    How long were you banned for?

    My irony detector just exploded. :cool:
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    geniusgirl wrote: »
    What's the problem?

    If people are working, they should be paid a wage.

    Why should existing workers have to suffer too, they are on the breadline as it is.
  • Options
    chinchinchinchin Posts: 125,853
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    Diaz wrote: »
    Please use social media to raise awareness about the issue.

    http://www.boycottworkfare.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/homebase-workfare.jpg

    Done! :D
  • Options
    Biffo the BearBiffo the Bear Posts: 25,859
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Instead of doing that, maybe people on JSA could do a few hours of work experience in the job centre itself, so they're actually taught how to work as a job centre member of staff.

    If they did enough hours so they worked at the equivalent of minimum wage rate then that'd be fine. So it'd work out to an average of 10 hours a week for JSA - no problem with that.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,095
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Diaz wrote: »
    How long were you banned for?

    How is that relevant or constructive?
Sign In or Register to comment.