Options

Lollipop man banned from 'high fiving' kids over health and safety

Will_BeeWill_Bee Posts: 1,567
Forum Member
✭✭✭
"Scotland's happiest lollipop man" has been banned from high fiving the kids.

Nkosana Mdikane, 74 is a black man with a big smile and a big laugh and great personality.


http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-31638993


I love characters like that who are always happy and smiling and laughing. The kids get a lot out of positive happy people like that.

Now the council has told him to the job only has as he has been trained and nothing else.
«1345

Comments

  • Options
    Steve_CardanasSteve_Cardanas Posts: 4,188
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Will_Bee wrote: »
    "Scotland's happiest lollipop man" has been banned from high fiving the kids.

    Nkosana Mdikane, 74 is a black man with a big smile and a big laugh and great personality.


    http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-31638993


    I love characters like that who are always happy and smiling and laughing. The kids get a lot out of positive happy people like that.

    Now the council has told him to the job only has as he has been trained and nothing else.

    typical of killjoys sado,jobsworth
  • Options
    abarthmanabarthman Posts: 8,501
    Forum Member
    If he wants to give high-fives to kids, he should become a children's entertainer.

    He is responsible for getting kids safely across the road, so he shouldn't be mucking about.
  • Options
    Pumping IronPumping Iron Posts: 29,891
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    He should just start fist pumping, far more static a movement and within the health and safety guidelines.
  • Options
    TrollHunterTrollHunter Posts: 12,496
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    abarthman wrote: »
    If he wants to give high-fives to kids, he should become a children's entertainer.

    He is responsible for getting kids safely across the road, so he shouldn't be mucking about.

    The lack of smilies makes me think you're actually serious. If so, you sad, sad person.
  • Options
    TomWhittonTomWhitton Posts: 1,465
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The council probably just don't want to get sued by some sly parent.

    If there's enough protest about it he'll probably be allowed to do the moonwalk and all sorts.
  • Options
    bluebladeblueblade Posts: 88,859
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Will_Bee wrote: »
    "Scotland's happiest lollipop man" has been banned from high fiving the kids.

    Nkosana Mdikane, 74 is a black man with a big smile and a big laugh and great personality.


    http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-31638993


    I love characters like that who are always happy and smiling and laughing. The kids get a lot out of positive happy people like that.


    Now the council has told him to the job only has as he has been trained and nothing else.

    Entirely correct. He has now been advised to stick purely to his job, and not to engage in such a silly way with the children. The distraction could potentially cause an accident whilst his attention is diverted from the road.

    No doubt a parent reported what he was doing, the activity was rightly risk assessed, and deemed to be potentially hazardous.
  • Options
    sutiesutie Posts: 32,645
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Lollipop Operative (:)) at my children's school was a right miserable git, who obviously hated his job, and the kids. I'd say this type of chap is definitely an improvement.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6,848
    Forum Member
    What a pity, he sounded great
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 929
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    blueblade wrote: »
    Entirely correct. He has now been advised to stick purely to his job, and not to engage in such a silly way with the children. The distraction could potentially cause an accident whilst his attention is diverted from the road.

    No doubt a parent reported what he was doing, the activity was rightly risk assessed, and deemed to be potentially hazardous.

    Lol. Didn't take long did it
  • Options
    QT 3.14QT 3.14 Posts: 1,771
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    blueblade wrote: »
    Entirely correct. He has now been advised to stick purely to his job, and not to engage in such a silly way with the children. The distraction could potentially cause an accident whilst his attention is diverted from the road.

    No doubt a parent reported what he was doing, the activity was rightly risk assessed, and deemed to be potentially hazardous.

    Please tell me you're not being serious.
  • Options
    Steve_CardanasSteve_Cardanas Posts: 4,188
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    QT 3.14 wrote: »
    Please tell me you're not being serious.

    sadly some people are just total killjoys and will make the world a very dull and boring future if they get their own way.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 20
    Forum Member
    steveh31 wrote: »
    Only took three posts for one of DS resident miseries to appear.
    The lack of smilies makes me think you're actually serious. If so, you sad, sad person.
    3sweet5u wrote: »
    Lol. Didn't take long did it


    It never does, there's always some out there who support the EU

    Perhaps they all including the one below should move to North Korea :D

    blueblade wrote: »
    Entirely correct. He has now been advised to stick purely to his job, and not to engage in such a silly way with the children. The distraction could potentially cause an accident whilst his attention is diverted from the road.

    No doubt a parent reported what he was doing, the activity was rightly risk assessed, and deemed to be potentially hazardous.
  • Options
    reglipreglip Posts: 5,268
    Forum Member
    The happiest lollipop man in the world
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOXNpnAiVuU

    Nkosana Mdikane used to be Scotland's happiest lollipop man
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSItgM-SdHQ
  • Options
    BenllechBenllech Posts: 2,299
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Daft.
  • Options
    dee123dee123 Posts: 46,274
    Forum Member
    blueblade wrote: »
    Entirely correct. He has now been advised to stick purely to his job, and not to engage in such a silly way with the children. The distraction could potentially cause an accident whilst his attention is diverted from the road.

    No doubt a parent reported what he was doing, the activity was rightly risk assessed, and deemed to be potentially hazardous.

    :confused: Explain how giving a high five could cause an accident?
  • Options
    bart4858bart4858 Posts: 11,436
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    dee123 wrote: »
    :confused: Explain how giving a high five could cause an accident?

    Aren't they supposed to hold the stick in one hand and have the other arm extended to make it clear traffic is barred from crossing or going around?

    Giving high-fives, that would not be obeying the rules. With the possible risk that any other gesturing with the free hand could be interpreted as beckoning the traffic to proceed.

    There has to be some standard behaviour that all drivers will recognise, otherwise they might as well stick their hand in their pocket or use it to hold a smartphone to their faces, or even wave it about to the music while listening to an iPod. That wouldn't be professional (imagine a real traffic cop giving high-fives to passing pedestrians).
  • Options
    Toby LaRhoneToby LaRhone Posts: 12,916
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Will_Bee wrote: »
    "Scotland's happiest lollipop man" has been banned from high fiving the kids.

    Nkosana Mdikane, 74 is a black man with a big smile and a big laugh and great personality.

    Imagine reading
    "Harry Thomas, 74 is a white man with a big smile and a big laugh and great personality"
  • Options
    lovedoctor1978lovedoctor1978 Posts: 2,327
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bart4858 wrote: »
    Aren't they supposed to hold the stick in one hand and have the other arm extended to make it clear traffic is barred from crossing or going around?

    Giving high-fives, that would not be obeying the rules. With the possible risk that any other gesturing with the free hand could be interpreted as beckoning the traffic to proceed.

    There has to be some standard behaviour that all drivers will recognise, otherwise they might as well stick their hand in their pocket or use it to hold a smartphone to their faces, or even wave it about to the music while listening to an iPod. That wouldn't be professional (imagine a real traffic cop giving high-fives to passing pedestrians).

    There is no place for this sort of sensibleness in a thread of this sort. Pure outrage at either end of the spectrum only please!
  • Options
    dee123dee123 Posts: 46,274
    Forum Member
    bart4858 wrote: »
    Aren't they supposed to hold the stick in one hand and have the other arm extended to make it clear traffic is barred from crossing or going around?

    Giving high-fives, that would not be obeying the rules. With the possible risk that any other gesturing with the free hand could be interpreted as beckoning the traffic to proceed.

    There has to be some standard behaviour that all drivers will recognise, otherwise they might as well stick their hand in their pocket or use it to hold a smartphone to their faces, or even wave it about to the music while listening to an iPod. That wouldn't be professional (imagine a real traffic cop giving high-fives to passing pedestrians).

    That's clutching at straws.
  • Options
    StrmChaserSteveStrmChaserSteve Posts: 2,728
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yeah, but everyone knows they aren't allowed to be touched these days

    Giving High 5's is touching

    I think the male population are in trouble when it comes to kids

    Scenario: a child on a beach becomes lost, and becomes distressed & upset
    A man not known to the family is nearby, and goes to comfort the distressed child
    As he's giving a reassuring hug... the distressed mother comes running up
    In her distressed state, thinks the man is trying to abduct her child.
    The police are called, and it goes on from there
  • Options
    artnadaartnada Posts: 10,113
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    abarthman wrote: »
    If he wants to give high-fives to kids, he should become a children's entertainer.

    He is responsible for getting kids safely across the road, so he shouldn't be mucking about.
    Started work Sept 2013. It's now Almost March 2015,. He has a 100% track record for safely getting thousands of kids across the road. I think that speaks volumes.
  • Options
    CentaurionCentaurion Posts: 2,060
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Council have had one complaint and rather than tell the killjoy complainant to f*** off and die, they have taken the easy option and chastised the cheery chappie.
  • Options
    bluebladeblueblade Posts: 88,859
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Imagine reading
    "Harry Thomas, 74 is a white man with a big smile and a big laugh and great personality"

    Indeed.

    Readers could see a photograph of him anyway. Completely pointless at best, and mildly racist at worst, to point out his colour.
  • Options
    Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    dee123 wrote: »
    :confused: Explain how giving a high five could cause an accident?
    Kids taking short cuts in front of a moving car in their excitement to get a Hi 5

    Never underestimate the ability of a child to do stupid things
Sign In or Register to comment.