Options

Box-set Britain is missing out on the real drama closer to home.

onecitizenonecitizen Posts: 5,042
Forum Member
The head of the BBC is moaning that British people would rather watch US made box set drama than home made programmes.
I thinks this is because the US made stuff is a lot more engaging than the usual depressing BBC productions.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/tv-radio/article4122419.ece
«13456789

Comments

  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Moaning?

    I can't really tell anyway as the site is paywalled.

    All that I can see is:
    Britain is full of box-set snobs who shout about their love of American imports and fail to realise that British drama is the best in the world, the head of BBC TV has suggested.

    Domestic shows such as Happy Valley and Broadchurch are just as good as the most celebrated American and Scandinavian versions, according to Danny Cohen.

    And it would look as if the comment (hardly a moan perhaps) was a generic one across ALL UK broadcasters (seeing as Broadchurch was mentioned in the only bit that I can see), but for some unfathomable reason you have chosen to make it a BBC-related one.
  • Options
    henderohendero Posts: 11,773
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    mossy2103 wrote: »
    Moaning?

    I can't really tell anyway as the site is paywalled.

    All that I can see is:

    Britain is full of box-set snobs who shout about their love of American imports and fail to realise that British drama is the best in the world, the head of BBC TV has suggested.

    Domestic shows such as Happy Valley and Broadchurch are just as good as the most celebrated American and Scandinavian versions, according to Danny Cohen.


    And it would look as if the comment (hardly a moan perhaps) was a generic one across ALL UK broadcasters (seeing as Broadchurch was mentioned in the only bit that I can see), but for some unfathomable reason you have chosen to make it a BBC-related one.

    The viewing figures here for the UK dramas are of course much higher than those for e.g. the US programmes on the likes of Sky Atlantic, even the ones on ITV, Channel 4, etc. I would hazard a guess that even if Game of Thrones was shown on BBC1 at 9pm Monday evenings it wouldn't get the same viewing numbers as Sherlock or Downton.

    Having said all that, Game of Thrones is far, far beyond anything that UK TV is likely to produce anytime soon in terms of programming quality. Having the biggest budget on US TV helps, obviously.
  • Options
    mikwmikw Posts: 48,715
    Forum Member
    hendero wrote: »
    The viewing figures here for the UK dramas are of course much higher than those for e.g. the US programmes on the likes of Sky Atlantic, even the ones on ITV, Channel 4, etc. I would hazard a guess that even if Game of Thrones was shown on BBC1 at 9pm Monday evenings it wouldn't get the same viewing numbers as Sherlock or Downton.

    Having said all that, Game of Thrones is far, far beyond anything that UK TV is likely to produce anytime soon in terms of programming quality. Having the biggest budget on US TV helps, obviously.

    I think there's good and bad on both sides of the pond. Happy Valley and Broadchurch are as good (if different) as anything else. In fact, they are preferable to some people.

    If there are "snobs" they are just as likely to be on the other side of the argument.

    i.e "Us Tv is better".....

    to

    "British Tv is better".

    They can both be brilliant in their own way.
  • Options
    blueisthecolourblueisthecolour Posts: 20,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    From a personal perspective; I find most UK drama pales in comparison to US and Nordic versions.

    For me the UK seems unable to move beyond the family friendly 'Merlin/Robin Hood' style of drama. Where beautiful people exchange sharp, witty dialogue in a fast paced script full of 'twists' and happy endings. They don't seem to have the courage of the US to have ambiguous characters or very dark story lines. Basically speaking they're not prepared to explore real life beyond a certain point.

    I mean Broadchurch was a notable exception of quality drama; but even that never came close to the exploring the dark realities of murder the same way as The Killing did. The Hour was a reasonable attempt at drama from the BBC but the quality of writing and courage to abandon traditional plotting like Mad Men, the show it was clearly based on, was obviously lacking. Even Sherlock, a show I know is loved by millions, is still a very 'safe' show when compared to something even like The Mentalist.

    For a large section of the UK public there obviously isn't a problem with the above. They don't want to watch torture porn or understand the thinking of a serial killer or engage in a complex show where drama isn't clearly sign posted at every step. But there's also a large section that does - my mum and step dad love both Call the Midwife and The Killing.
  • Options
    TassiumTassium Posts: 31,639
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I think it's the critical aclaim that Danny Cohen is whining about.

    Critical aclaim = status.

    (And maybe a better job in the US)
  • Options
    mikwmikw Posts: 48,715
    Forum Member
    From a personal perspective; I find most UK drama pales in comparison to US and Nordic versions.

    For me the UK seems unable to move beyond the family friendly 'Merlin/Robin Hood' style of drama. Where beautiful people exchange sharp, witty dialogue in a fast paced script full of 'twists' and happy endings. They don't seem to have the courage of the US to have ambiguous characters or very dark story lines. Basically speaking they're not prepared to explore real life beyond a certain point.

    I mean Broadchurch was a notable exception of quality drama; but even that never came close to the exploring the dark realities of murder the same way as The Killing did. The Hour was a reasonable attempt at drama from the BBC but the quality of writing and courage to abandon traditional plotting like Mad Men, the show it was clearly based on, was obviously lacking. Even Sherlock, a show I know is loved by millions, is still a very 'safe' show when compared to something even like The Mentalist.

    For a large section of the UK public there obviously isn't a problem with the above. They don't want to watch torture porn or understand the thinking of a serial killer or engage in a complex show where drama isn't clearly sign posted at every step. But there's also a large section that does - my mum and step dad love both Call the Midwife and The Killing.

    You want to try Happy Valley, "very safe" it is not...
  • Options
    ElMarkoElMarko Posts: 5,224
    Forum Member
    There's lots of fans of UK (or even European) stuff in North America, proving that people just want to branch out and see what else is going on. It's very good that this happens.
  • Options
    lundavralundavra Posts: 31,790
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ElMarko wrote: »
    There's lots of fans of UK (or even European) stuff in North America, proving that people just want to branch out and see what else is going on. It's very good that this happens.

    Relatives and friends there love to receive discs with UK programmes on them.

    I can't remember the last time I watched a US drama series, I have been exposed to them when visiting friends but all the ones I have seen there just seem mass produced, often with wooden acting (awards or not!).
  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    hendero wrote: »
    Having said all that, Game of Thrones is far, far beyond anything that UK TV is likely to produce anytime soon in terms of programming quality. Having the biggest budget on US TV helps, obviously.
    I think that is a big difference. And generally, aside from the bigger-budget costume dramas, UK drama is much more frugal. But as has been demonstrated with the likes of Broadchurch, The Fall, Happy Valley and Peaky Blinders, you don't need large budgets and expensive sets/special effects in order to make a compelling drama that appeals to many. good writing and acting seems to carry the day there.
  • Options
    IcePhoenixIcePhoenix Posts: 26
    Forum Member
    onecitizen wrote: »
    The head of the BBC is moaning that British people would rather watch US made box set drama than home made programmes.
    I thinks this is because the US made stuff is a lot more engaging than the usual depressing BBC productions.
    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/tv-radio/article4122419.ece
    The only thing depressing about it is the people who moan about it in the first place. ;)
  • Options
    RadiomikeRadiomike Posts: 7,949
    Forum Member
    I do wish that British TV bosses, particularly those in the BBC, would stop uttering this fallacy that "British TV is the best in the world". It is an entirely subjective and self serving statement that cannot be verified in any meaningful terms in today's world.

    It may once have been true, but in a very different television environment, The reality is that Britain does still turn out some brilliant drama - Downton Abbey, Broadchurch, Peaky Blinders etc - but it also turns out some average, formulaic, mediocre and downright rubbish drama as well. The US in particular has significantly upped its game in recent years - True Detective, Fargo and of course Breaking Bad being recent strong examples. Even their 22 part standard network fare - Good Wife, Chicago Fire, Blue Bloods, Elementary, The Blacklist, Person of Interest, The Mentalist, Law and Order:SVU etc etc - is of much higher quality than used to be the case and IMO is generally preferable to some comparable home grown product. There is also more of it at each level of quality.

    Danny Cohen won't win many friends by calling people snobs because they like drama from elsewhere than the BBC and ITV. He should just concentrate on producing great drama. If he does then it will get the attention and credit it deserves - but it won't stop me watching the non BBC and ITV shows I've listed above and many others.

    It is just as "snobbish" to claim that British drama is the best in the world Danny :D
  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Radiomike wrote: »
    Danny Cohen won't win many friends by calling people snobs because they like drama from elsewhere than the BBC and ITV.
    But has he called anyone a snob? I can't view the paywalled content.

    Maybe the word "snob" was used by headline writers (and a bit of lazy copying from some, including the BBC)?

    Because all that I can find is this from the BBC website:
    Domestic dramas like Downton Abbey and Sherlock are just as good as Mad Men or The Wire, according to Danny Cohen.

    He said British shows were being maligned by "box-set consumers who have a larger voice in Britain's cultural dialogue than the average families

    And from the Mail:
    'A trope has developed, a cultural meme that asserts that American drama is far superior to drama produced in the UK and at the BBC,' he said.

    'It's an argument driven by box-set consumers who have a louder voice in Britain's cultural dialogue than the average family who sit down at night in Britain's towns and villages to decide which drama they want to watch.

    No use of the word "snob" there.
  • Options
    MoreTearsMoreTears Posts: 7,025
    Forum Member
    I have read the whole Times article, and there seems to me to be a rather big problem with it. The first paragraph of the story refers to Cohen believing that British drama is the best in the world. The second paragraph says that Cohen thinks Happy Valley and Broadchurch are as good as the most celebrated American and Scandinavian dramas. Now here is the problem: the rest of the article contains a numbers of quotations from Cohen, and NONE of them support what the first two paragraphs in the article say Cohen believes. Did Cohen make statements that were NOT quoted in the article, and The Times paraphrased the substance of the statements in the first two paragraphs? Or, did The Times just misinterpret Cohen? Frankly, this seems like very poor journalism. I think the best of American TV drama is beating British drama like the proverbial red-headed step-child, and I didn't find the things Cohen is QUOTED as saying in the Times objectionable. I repeat: poor journalism by The Times.
  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Thanks for that - things are a little clearer now.
  • Options
    StalwartUKStalwartUK Posts: 684
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    American TV is usually more willing to take chances than British TV, who tend to be more beholden to things like political correctness and the like. They also tend to have bigger budgets, bigger markets and a larger talent pool which enables them to create higher quality programming.

    There's only so many BBC costume dramas I can take. The BBC doesn't usually bother trying to appeal to my age range in any case. American broadcasters do.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 672
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    If British drama is the best in the world, then the BBC and ITV are doing a very poor job in advertising it.
  • Options
    InkblotInkblot Posts: 26,889
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Although the article doesn't specifically mention it, one issue is that Netflix and Amazon, and most significantly Sky, have all championed the idea of box set consumption over week-by-week viewing of dramas. So the BBC isn't simply competing with Game of Thrones on a Monday night and Mad Men on a Wednesday night, it's competing with those shows, plus Breaking Bad and all the other usual suspects, all day every day. And the BBC doesn't know how, or doesn't have the resources, to fight back.

    Last week I saw a trailer before Wallander for Happy Valley - "now on iPlayer" - so decided to start watching it as it's had such positive reviews. But by the time I was ready to watch it, it had been deleted from iPlayer (and thus wiped from Sky+). The box set audience doesn't like being told that it can't watch a show because it's "expired", and the BBC needs to address this or the good shows that it does still produce will go unwatched by the very audience it's trying to win over.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 672
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    StalwartUK wrote: »
    American TV is usually more willing to take chances than British TV, who tend to be more beholden to things like political correctness and the like. They also tend to have bigger budgets, bigger markets and a larger talent pool which enables them to create higher quality programming.

    There's only so many BBC costume dramas I can take. The BBC doesn't usually bother trying to appeal to my age range in any case. American broadcasters do.

    I agree with everything apart from the larger talent pool. The big hit of the moment - Game of Thrones is wall to wall UK acting talent
  • Options
    Peter the GreatPeter the Great Posts: 14,230
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I think as others have said you don't know whether Cohen has been misquoted. Regarding British Drama I think surprisingly ITV has improved alot with the quality of Drama where as the BBC has gone downhill even though they do still come up with some gems. Happy Valley, Peaky Blinders, Line of Duty and From here to There were all excellent but Atlantis, Jamaica Inn and Quirke were all bloody awful. Channel 4 has been quiet On the Drama front with Utopia, Southcliffe and Top Boy being their only notable recent Dramas. Certainly when British Drama is good it can be just as good as the US offerings.
  • Options
    Peter the GreatPeter the Great Posts: 14,230
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Inkblot wrote: »
    Although the article doesn't specifically mention it, one issue is that Netflix and Amazon, and most significantly Sky, have all championed the idea of box set consumption over week-by-week viewing of dramas. So the BBC isn't simply competing with Game of Thrones on a Monday night and Mad Men on a Wednesday night, it's competing with those shows, plus Breaking Bad and all the other usual suspects, all day every day. And the BBC doesn't know how, or doesn't have the resources, to fight back.

    Last week I saw a trailer before Wallander for Happy Valley - "now on iPlayer" - so decided to start watching it as it's had such positive reviews. But by the time I was ready to watch it, it had been deleted from iPlayer (and thus wiped from Sky+). The box set audience doesn't like being told that it can't watch a show because it's "expired", and the BBC needs to address this or the good shows that it does still produce will go unwatched by the very audience it's trying to win over.
    You hit On a good point. I downloaded Happy Valley to iPlayer desktop so I watched in all in 2 sittings and is much better being able to watch this way. Sadly torrenting will continue all the time broadcasters give people limited time to watch shows.
  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    StalwartUK wrote: »

    There's only so many BBC costume dramas I can take..
    But they do far more drama than simply costume drama. That is indisputable
  • Options
    CricketbladeCricketblade Posts: 2,218
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sherlock is proof we are not snobs to uk made stuff. If it is good enough and given a good slot it will find a big audience.

    Utopia is the only thing that the UK has made that stands up to the top US stuff that has never really taken off in ratings and even that is being remade for US crowds. Broadchurch is bigged up as a huge hit which it was but it was a bit soapy. Downton Abbey is nonsense.
  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Inkblot wrote: »
    Last week I saw a trailer before Wallander for Happy Valley - "now on iPlayer" - so decided to start watching it as it's had such positive reviews. But by the time I was ready to watch it, it had been deleted from iPlayer (and thus wiped from Sky+). The box set audience doesn't like being told that it can't watch a show because it's "expired", and the BBC needs to address this or the good shows that it does still produce will go unwatched by the very audience it's trying to win over.
    They should soon be able to extend that 7-day window (which encompasses series stacking, so all 6 episodes would have been available up until the end of the 7th week) to 30 days.

    I guess that, to extend that time any further would involve more protracted rights negotiations, and greater rights costs
  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    You hit On a good point. I downloaded Happy Valley to iPlayer desktop so I watched in all in 2 sittings and is much better being able to watch this way. Sadly torrenting will continue all the time broadcasters give people limited time to watch shows.
    Maybe invest in a PVR?

    And accept that online viewing will never match the unlimited nature of PVR viewing.
  • Options
    Peter the GreatPeter the Great Posts: 14,230
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    mossy2103 wrote: »
    Maybe invest in a PVR?

    And accept that online viewing will never match the unlimited nature of PVR viewing.
    I have a PVR. A 1tb Freesat box which after a year is 90% full.:blush: The thing is though you might forget or was not aware the show was on.
Sign In or Register to comment.