Let each celeb do a trial?

Have been thinking about this for a few series now as there are some celebs who can go through almost the whole 3 weeks without doing anything and others that get selected for everything which can get very boring to watch them not even try and have a decent attempt.

Would it not be better to have each celeb do a trial first then go to the public vote to complete the rest of the show? This way they can be guaranteed at least something to eat and it would remove the chances of someone walking out if they feel picked on to do all the trials.

Comments

  • niki1969niki1969 Posts: 153
    Forum Member
    Completely agree with you. It is getting boring seeing the same person doing the trials day after day.
  • linmiclinmic Posts: 13,425
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I agree. They should draw names at the start of the programme so they take it in turns to do the trials. Some people sail through it doing nothing at all.
  • sherisgirlsherisgirl Posts: 2,405
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    We have been saying this since Jan Lemming and Katie Prices second stint, let the campmates decide amongst themselves.
  • Robert_WhippyRobert_Whippy Posts: 2,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    the problem is they could do that but by the team every one has done a trial it'd be time for the voting off.

    I think when they split them into 2 groups they should do that. then after 5 trials everyones had a go and then they can form a big group and public votes for the rest
  • ReservedReserved Posts: 12,058
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    sherisgirl wrote: »
    We have been saying this since Jan Lemming and Katie Prices second stint, let the campmates decide amongst themselves.

    They would all go into the trial determined to succeed, too.
    Kendra wouldn't "play up" because she'd know that if she came back with only a star or two, the others wouldn't choose her to do it again, which would mean less airtime for her. By going into the trial and getting the majority of stars, it makes it much more likely that the others will want you to do another one later on.

    I don't understand it... They go to the effort of building some good trials (such as Kendra's latest one - the tomb one, where she got two stars) and yet it isn't shown to its full potential because we continuously vote for the person we know won't attempt it. So, why not change the rules and not allow us to vote? Then the trial team aren't working for sod all. The trial is the main attraction of the show, they should want to show it off :confused:
  • Mrs ChecksMrs Checks Posts: 8,363
    Forum Member
    Couldn't agree more! It is so tiresome seeing the same celeb do trial after trial.

    However, the show is as much as a business as entertainment, so until they figure out a way to generate as much money as they do from everyone voting for the usual trial suspects, think we'll be stuck with the pattern.
  • greenyonegreenyone Posts: 3,545
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I agree 👍
  • Crawley CutieCrawley Cutie Posts: 10,931
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    They receive vast amounts of money from the voting Public - they won't be jeopardising that :(

    The probable multi-votes for the same person - would be increasing this revenue.

    Shame, because it is ruining the show >:(
  • JVSJVS Posts: 12,674
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Jimmy got the secret jacuzzi task, the pool party treat, and now the mystery challenge. FFS ITV, there are celebs in there that we hardly see, we know Jimmy's your favourite but give someone else a bit of screen time!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.