Ed has no time to meet or take a call from Pfizer chief

«1

Comments

  • LateralthinkingLateralthinking Posts: 8,027
    Forum Member
    Barbra wrote: »

    Miliband -

    Not Minded to talk to Pfizer.
  • Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    If he had taken the call it would be 'Ed in secret meeting with Pfizer Chief'
  • jmclaughjmclaugh Posts: 63,997
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    He' not obliged to take such a call or meeting but when he says the "stakes could not be higher" you would imagine he would want to hear what Pfizer have to say.
  • BarbraBarbra Posts: 15,581
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Ethel_Fred wrote: »
    If he had taken the call it would be 'Ed in secret meeting with Pfizer Chief'
    jmclaugh wrote: »
    He' not obliged to take such a call or meeting but when he says the "stakes could not be higher" you would imagine he would want to hear what Pfizer have to say.

    So nobody believes that he has no time to take a call for the next month because of the European elections.
  • jmclaughjmclaugh Posts: 63,997
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Barbra wrote: »
    So nobody believes that he has no time to take a call for the next month because of the European elections.

    No idea about anyone else, but I don't.
  • paul2307paul2307 Posts: 8,079
    Forum Member
    jmclaugh wrote: »
    He' not obliged to take such a call or meeting but when he says the "stakes could not be higher" you would imagine he would want to hear what Pfizer have to say.

    To be fair the wind had probably changed direction between him refusing the meeting and saying that , well that or realized he missed another bandwagon to jump on
  • glasshalffullglasshalffull Posts: 22,291
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Who on earth would think a socialist should be poking his nose into something capitalism should be sorting out in the first place?
  • jmclaughjmclaugh Posts: 63,997
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Who on earth would think a socialist should be poking his nose into something capitalism should be sorting out in the first place?

    Which socialist would this be?
  • paul2307paul2307 Posts: 8,079
    Forum Member
    Who on earth would think a socialist should be poking his nose into something capitalism should be sorting out in the first place?

    So a potential Prime Minister should have no interest in something thats worth billions to British economy ? :confused:
  • MartinPMartinP Posts: 31,358
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Ethel_Fred wrote: »
    If he had taken the call it would be 'Ed in secret meeting with Pfizer Chief'

    Why on earth would Ed want to keep such a meeting secret? :confused:
  • MartinPMartinP Posts: 31,358
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    paul2307 wrote: »
    So a potential Prime Minister should have no interest in something thats worth billions to British economy ? :confused:

    This could have been a chance for Ed to take a lead on the situation but he bottled it.
  • Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    paul2307 wrote: »
    So a potential Prime Minister should have no interest in something thats worth billions to British economy ? :confused:
    Potential PM interferes in legitimate business activity

    Has potential PM done a deal with asset strippers and tax dodgers?
  • LostFoolLostFool Posts: 90,647
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    MartinP wrote: »
    Why on earth would Ed want to keep such a meeting secret? :confused:

    Ed's "private and off the record" supper club with the "business community":

    http://order-order.com/2014/05/07/astrazeneca-lobbyists-confirm-labour-relationship/
  • glasshalffullglasshalffull Posts: 22,291
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    MartinP wrote: »
    This could have been a chance for Ed to take a lead on the situation but he bottled it.

    Oh so "the market rools" only applies so far does it...suddenly it's ok for politicians to start getting involved...I'm shocked I truly am :o.
  • paul2307paul2307 Posts: 8,079
    Forum Member
    Ethel_Fred wrote: »
    Potential PM interferes in legitimate business activity

    Has potential PM done a deal with asset strippers and tax dodgers?

    How about potential PM saves British jobs or keeps billions in the British economy ?

    With Ed it would more likely be potential PM cocks it up but this was a test for him and his abilities as a leader one which he failed
  • MartinPMartinP Posts: 31,358
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Oh so "the market rools" only applies so far does it...suddenly it's ok for politicians to start getting involved...I'm shocked I truly am :o.

    Ed's already involved as he wants the Prime Minister to subject Pfizer’s £63bn bid for Astra Zeneca to an independent “national interest test”.

    The Labour leader accused David Cameron of acting as a “cheerleader” for the controversial deal rather than protecting the British pharamceutical company's future.

    “I think David Cameron is in totally the wrong place on this issue,” he told the BBC’s Andrew Marr show. “He has become a cheerleader for Pfizer’s takeover when instead he should be championing Astra Zeneca’s long term plan.”

    He added: "The prime minister, rather than being that cheerleader for this takeover with paper thin assurances, should be actually championing British jobs and a British success story that is AstraZeneca – investing in research and development, a crucial part of our science base."

    Mr Miliband suggested that Cameron should adopt the protectionist stance of other economies. “No other country in the world would be waving this bid through," he said.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/pharmaceuticalsandchemicals/10807399/Pfizer-bid-for-Astra-must-face-national-interest-test-says-Miliband.html

    Why doesn't he think it's worthwhile meeting the head of Pfizer? Because it would then leave him open to actually have to answer specific questions and he would have to give facts to support his rhetoric that could be disputed.

    He bottled it.
  • Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    paul2307 wrote: »
    How about potential PM saves British jobs or keeps billions in the British economy ?

    With Ed it would more likely be potential PM cocks it up but this was a test for him and his abilities as a leader one which he failed

    Because the headlines would have condemned Ed whatever he did
  • paul2307paul2307 Posts: 8,079
    Forum Member
    Ethel_Fred wrote: »
    Because the headlines would have condemned Ed whatever he did

    Only if he got it wrong but I'm assuming from that comment you expect him to cock it up
  • gummy mummygummy mummy Posts: 26,600
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Ethel_Fred wrote: »
    Because the headlines would have condemned Ed whatever he did

    Of course they would. He's asked that the bosses of Pfizer and Astrazeneca are called in front of a Westminster select committee and questioned over the proposed £63bn pharmaceuticals mega-merger., that should be enough.

    Has Cameron had any meetings with the Pfizer chief or just his business secretary ?
  • trevgotrevgo Posts: 28,241
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Why this should surprise anyone I can't imagine.

    Why on earth would Miliband spend valuable time meeting the CEO of Pfizer when he could be out playing with politics like the good boy he is?

    Play is all Labour do. They want power for the sake of it - they haven't a clue what they'd do with it if they got it. I actually think this mob would be an even bigger disaster than the Blair/Brown class.

    My blood runs cold at the thought.
  • glasshalffullglasshalffull Posts: 22,291
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Of course they would. He's asked that the bosses of Pfizer and Astrazeneca are called in front of a Westminster select committee and questioned over the proposed £63bn pharmaceuticals mega-merger., that should be enough.

    Has Cameron had any meetings with the Pfizer chief or just his business secretary ?


    Dave has been busy elsewhere:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10818587/David-Cameron-is-star-attraction-in-Nandos.html
  • gummy mummygummy mummy Posts: 26,600
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭

    He probably just needed a bit of comfort food to make him feel better because the Pfizer chief hasn't asked to meet with him :D
  • flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    He's not to busy. it's a lie.

    another one.
  • gummy mummygummy mummy Posts: 26,600
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    flagpole wrote: »
    He's not to busy. it's a lie.

    another one.

    And you know this because...You have access to his diary :o:D
  • LateralthinkingLateralthinking Posts: 8,027
    Forum Member
    LostFool wrote: »
    Ed's "private and off the record" supper club with the "business community":

    http://order-order.com/2014/05/07/astrazeneca-lobbyists-confirm-labour-relationship/

    Interesting - thanks.
Sign In or Register to comment.