That may work from further education level like some do already, but definitely not from primary or secondary. To be able to learn from sat at a computer, you first need the basics in place. Not sure how you are going to teach a four year old to read from a computer, it's rather back to front.
Subjects would be rather limited, nothing that needs practical work, all text based, not to mention the physical and social health of kids who spend all day sat at a computer.
I don't see how this idea would even save money, you would still need the classrooms for all the computers and someone knowledgeable in all classes to help. All you would be doing is replacing the other teaching aids with computers.
Or cell
This is the OP who 2 years ago claimed on the BB forum that he had been incarcerated in a Philippine prison...the one where they did the Michael Jackson Thriller dance...the one where the most violent in society are put...:D
Or cell
This is the OP who 2 years ago claimed on the BB forum that he had been incarcerated in a Philippine prison...the one where they did the Michael Jackson Thriller dance...the one where the most violent in society are put...:D
Presumably it was while incarcerated there that he came up with his radical educational theory. And they say prison doesn't work.
This compulsive greeting of people is a bit of a worry though.
That may work from further education level like some do already, but definitely not from primary or secondary. To be able to learn from sat at a computer, you first need the basics in place. Not sure how you are going to teach a four year old to read from a computer, it's rather back to front.
Subjects would be rather limited, nothing that needs practical work, all text based, not to mention the physical and social health of kids who spend all day sat at a computer.
I don't see how this idea would even save money, you would still need the classrooms for all the computers and someone knowledgeable in all classes to help. All you would be doing is replacing the other teaching aids with computers.
Hello:)
You still need to collate information from your practical work- still needs to be imputed somewhere.
A result determined, judged.
Also, facial recognition software can be tweaked to judge structure, experiment.
Not an ideal solution but just to show our techniques can be developed to enhance the learning experience.
Genius only comes after a problem is discovered
Four year olds already read from computers.
Those that aren't savvy enough to take to e-reading can be plucked from the class and sent to home economics
You still need to collate information from your practical work- still needs to be imputed somewhere.
A result determined, judged.
Also, facial recognition software can be tweaked to judge structure, experiment.
Not an ideal solution but just to show our techniques can be developed to enhance the learning experience.
Genius only comes after a problem is discovered
Four year olds already read from computers.
Those that aren't savvy enough to take to e-reading can be plucked from the class and sent to home economics
Crock. Of. Shite.
I don't know why I or anyone else has replied to this idiotic thread. Yeah, a four year old who can't read from a computer should be put in a room with a hot stove and sharp knives. Actually, I'd trust a four year old with an Aga and some Sabbtier knives before I'd let you go near them.
Crock. Of. Shite.
I don't know why I or anyone else has replied to this idiotic thread. Yeah, a four year old who can't read from a computer should be put in a room with a hot stove and sharp knives. Actually, I'd trust a four year old with an Aga and some Sabbtier knives before I'd let you go near them.
Presumably it was while incarcerated there that he came up with his radical educational theory. And they say prison doesn't work.
This compulsive greeting of people is a bit of a worry though.
He didn't always used to do the whole 'Hello ' thing either...he developed that just before BB 2008, and insisted he always had.
I have to say...it's an MO designed to annoy...so you could say that it is an excellent part of his 'range'..just many of us are wise to him now
He didn't always used to do the whole 'Hello ' thing either...he developed that just before BB 2008, and insisted he always had.
I have to say...it's an MO designed to annoy...so you could say that it is an excellent part of his 'range'..just many of us are wise to him now
It's rather childish, imo. He may be able to be taken seriously, he may have some good points to make, but as soon as I see that insipid, condescending bloody smiley, I just want to stick a fork in my arm.
Crock. Of. Shite.
I don't know why I or anyone else has replied to this idiotic thread. Yeah, a four year old who can't read from a computer should be put in a room with a hot stove and sharp knives. Actually, I'd trust a four year old with an Aga and some Sabbtier knives before I'd let you go near them.
Hello:)
Kids learn cooking on an Aga now?
It was given as an example of how to match the neutral inclination of a child to a suitable pursuit.
A four year old can learn from a screen, as long as the screen is suited to a four year old.
They aren't as scared of new things as the adults seem to be.
Those that aren't savvy enough to take to e-reading can be plucked from the class and sent to home economics
Where they learn to read and write from following recipes. Where they learn about nutrition and how to provide a balanced diet. Where they become physically fit moving about a kitchen and running around to buy their ingredients. Where they learn about cooperation and teamwork and translating written instructions into practical action.
Later, of course, they will enter the job market where they will be in competition with those whose only educational experience is sitting alone gawping at a pc screen.
Parents will be fighting for their children to be admitted to the exclusive home economics classes.:cool:
Let's call the whole thing off- over paid, under-worked teachers- be gone with you.
Install internet terminals, online education classes.
Technology inspires children more than teachers do.
Let's just put a stop to all human contact, after all, that's what we're breeding, kids reliant on PS3s, Wiis, the net, drive thru fast food, who needs social contact or to be educated by a human being, good or bad. Who needs life's lessons , huh?
Where they learn to read and write from following recipes. Where they learn about nutrition and how to provide a balanced diet. Where they become physically fit moving about a kitchen and running around to buy their ingredients. Where they learn about cooperation and teamwork and translating written instructions into practical action.
Later, of course, they will enter the job market where they will be in competition with those whose only educational experience is sitting along gawping at a pc screen.
Parents will be fighting for their children to be admitted to the exclusive home economics classes.:cool:
Hello:)
And Labour weren't trying to resurrect apprenticeships and push less book-smart pupils into manual careers?
I don't think a situation in which every single teacher was suddenly sacked and replaced by a computer, could possibly be envisaged. But certainly the addition of more extensive e learning at every level, might well reduce the burden on teachers, and eventually reduce the need for so many teachers.
Class teacher Chris Smy is second in the maths department and e-learning co-ordinator at The John Bentley School in Wiltshire. The school has 1,200 pupils and serves a highly mixed community, including some of the most and least affluent wards in the country. It has specialist language status.
"Too many young people start their GCSEs feeling that because they are on foundation courses, they cannot achieve high grades and so are heading for failure. So the idea of students being able to gain hooks into higher levels of the diploma, and so be encouraged to carry on, seems very positive.
As a school, we are very committed to e-learning solutions. The evolution of a portal hosted by the south-west grid for learning (one of 10 regional broadband consortia in England) will enable us to broaden our curriculum in line with the proposals, though as a rural school we face special challenges in this respect. We have forged a good collegiate relationship with other schools.
Let's just put a stop to all human contact, after all, that's what we're breeding, kids reliant on PS3s, Wiis, the net, drive thru fast food, who needs social contact or to be educated by a human being, good or bad.
Hello:)
They are learning together, in a huge hall, being entranced by the technology that surrounds them.
It's rather childish, imo. He may be able to be taken seriously, he may have some good points to make, but as soon as I see that insipid, condescending bloody smiley, I just want to stick a fork in my arm.
I feel your pain However, after 2 years of half truths, downright lies and limp attempts to wind up other members....I don't think he has any good points.
The smiley is more annoying than the :rolleyes: one. The latter is a sign of losing an argument, the former is an attempt to start one.
Comments
well he knows nothing about teaching.
Underworked is not a word I'd use to describe them (having 3 of them in the family).
And escorting gently back to his room.;)
Hello:)
Work can be marked through a combination of methods- self critique, programs operating mark-as-you-go methods.
Centralised marking offices.
The idiots siphoned off into intensive teaching modules.
The most fundamental tools to learning must include- spelling, essay writing and maths.
With those basics, anyone can learn, from any method.
Subjects would be rather limited, nothing that needs practical work, all text based, not to mention the physical and social health of kids who spend all day sat at a computer.
I don't see how this idea would even save money, you would still need the classrooms for all the computers and someone knowledgeable in all classes to help. All you would be doing is replacing the other teaching aids with computers.
Then why are so many people on here as thick as sh*t.
Or cell
This is the OP who 2 years ago claimed on the BB forum that he had been incarcerated in a Philippine prison...the one where they did the Michael Jackson Thriller dance...the one where the most violent in society are put...:D
Ever wondered why your parents and grandparents can spell and add up and you can't?
This compulsive greeting of people is a bit of a worry though.
Hello:)
You still need to collate information from your practical work- still needs to be imputed somewhere.
A result determined, judged.
Also, facial recognition software can be tweaked to judge structure, experiment.
Not an ideal solution but just to show our techniques can be developed to enhance the learning experience.
Genius only comes after a problem is discovered
Four year olds already read from computers.
Those that aren't savvy enough to take to e-reading can be plucked from the class and sent to home economics
Crock. Of. Shite.
I don't know why I or anyone else has replied to this idiotic thread. Yeah, a four year old who can't read from a computer should be put in a room with a hot stove and sharp knives. Actually, I'd trust a four year old with an Aga and some Sabbtier knives before I'd let you go near them.
Great post!
He didn't always used to do the whole 'Hello ' thing either...he developed that just before BB 2008, and insisted he always had.
I have to say...it's an MO designed to annoy...so you could say that it is an excellent part of his 'range'..just many of us are wise to him now
Where's the interaction with e-learning?
It's rather childish, imo. He may be able to be taken seriously, he may have some good points to make, but as soon as I see that insipid, condescending bloody smiley, I just want to stick a fork in my arm.
Hello:)
Kids learn cooking on an Aga now?
It was given as an example of how to match the neutral inclination of a child to a suitable pursuit.
A four year old can learn from a screen, as long as the screen is suited to a four year old.
They aren't as scared of new things as the adults seem to be.
Where they learn to read and write from following recipes. Where they learn about nutrition and how to provide a balanced diet. Where they become physically fit moving about a kitchen and running around to buy their ingredients. Where they learn about cooperation and teamwork and translating written instructions into practical action.
Later, of course, they will enter the job market where they will be in competition with those whose only educational experience is sitting alone gawping at a pc screen.
Parents will be fighting for their children to be admitted to the exclusive home economics classes.:cool:
Hello:)
What is the ratio of good to bad?
Kids leaving school who can't write, spell or structure a coherent thought.
And people are becoming protective over a system that is failing most children, if not all.
E-reading can be made interactive.
It's a clean slate- it can be modelled in any way we choose.
Let's just put a stop to all human contact, after all, that's what we're breeding, kids reliant on PS3s, Wiis, the net, drive thru fast food, who needs social contact or to be educated by a human being, good or bad. Who needs life's lessons , huh?
Hello:)
And Labour weren't trying to resurrect apprenticeships and push less book-smart pupils into manual careers?
Of course.
I don't think a situation in which every single teacher was suddenly sacked and replaced by a computer, could possibly be envisaged. But certainly the addition of more extensive e learning at every level, might well reduce the burden on teachers, and eventually reduce the need for so many teachers.
Interesting link here
Hello:)
They are learning together, in a huge hall, being entranced by the technology that surrounds them.
And haven't we all heard stories about graduates then choosing to follow appreticeships in plumbing etc?
I feel your pain However, after 2 years of half truths, downright lies and limp attempts to wind up other members....I don't think he has any good points.
The smiley is more annoying than the :rolleyes: one. The latter is a sign of losing an argument, the former is an attempt to start one.