Home› Reality TV Shows› Britain's Got Talent
Click here to check out Digital Spy's Britain's Got Talent coverage, including breaking news, rumours and contestant updates.

Voting Percentages Revealed!

InMyArmsInMyArms Posts: 50,790
Forum Member
✭
in Britain's Got Talent #1
http://www.itv.com/britainsgottalent/live-shows/britains-got-talent-2016-voting-percentages-revealed
Vote 4

Beau Dermott - 29.7%
Tumar KR - 18.2%
Balance Unity -17.3%
Wildcard
Trip Hazard - 32.8%
Tumar KR - 21.3%
Shannon & Peter - 19.1%

TumarKR were robbed,
«1

Comments

  • Slow_LorisSlow_Loris Posts: 24,876
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #2
    Well that is not a surprise at all
  • CamisCamis Posts: 13,549
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #3
    So Shannon and Peter beat Alex by quite a bit in their semi final. Tamar should have made it to the final ahead of Balance
  • lauranceallenlauranceallen Posts: 5,355
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #4
    basically judges pushed through 2 pet acts over others..no surprise there.
  • xeoxeo Posts: 6,429
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #5
    The winner didn't even get a fifth of the vote. Maybe they should introduce a second round of voting between the top 3 so more people can be happy with the result.
  • Slow_LorisSlow_Loris Posts: 24,876
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #6
    They also beat the ballet dancers on the wild card vote. I wonder why they didn't want them in the final?
  • lauranceallenlauranceallen Posts: 5,355
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #7
    xeo wrote: »
    The winner didn't even get a fifth of the vote. Maybe they should introduce a second round of voting between the top 3 so more people can be happy with the result.

    Yeah a superfinal of the tyop 3 kind of makes sense with 12 acts in the running, basically it was a total toss up.
  • lea27lea27 Posts: 11,426
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #8
    So did the judges see that percentage difference between Alex and the dancing couple and that's why they put them through on the wildcard? Otherwise surely they would have picked Tumar kr.
  • DamienSDamienS Posts: 12,437
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #9
    Why put Richard on second when he smashed his semi?
  • Sarah777Sarah777 Posts: 5,060
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #10
    Really embarrassing, winning with 16.7%
  • FuddFudd Posts: 166,970
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    #11
    gilesb wrote: »
    They also beat the ballet dancers on the wild card vote. I wonder why they didn't want them in the final?

    I'm assuming they didn't want two acts in the final who put people on edge? They already had Alex.

    That's looking at the decision favourably. I'm tempted to say they were the wrong nationality. :blush:
  • lauranceallenlauranceallen Posts: 5,355
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #12
    I also think Craig winning semi 5 put a cramp in their plan, they were all set for a jasmine/trip top 2 in that one.
  • TTTangoTTTango Posts: 7,619
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #13
    Shannon and Peter were second in their semi-final. Judges probably felt guilty at not putting them through first time round, hence why they got the wildcard.
    Surprised Trip was 3rd in his semi, I thought he would have beaten Jasmine.
  • DamienSDamienS Posts: 12,437
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #14
    What are the other winning percentages?
  • TTTangoTTTango Posts: 7,619
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #15
    lauranceallen wrote: »
    basically judges pushed through 2 pet acts over others..no surprise there.

    2 pet acts :confused: there was only one Pet act and that was Trip, and it was the viewers who put Trip through, not the judges.
  • FuddFudd Posts: 166,970
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    #16
    TTTango wrote: »
    Shannon and Peter were second in their semi-final. Judges probably felt guilty at not putting them through first time round, hence why they got the wildcard.
    Surprised Trip was 3rd in his semi, I thought he would have beaten Jasmine.

    Tumar KR finished second in their semi final as well.
  • lauranceallenlauranceallen Posts: 5,355
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #17
    DamienS wrote: »
    What are the other winning percentages?

    Jules and matisse 23%

    Collabro 27%

    Attraction 27%

    Pudsey 39%

    Jai mcdowall 29%

    Spellbound 37%

    /diversity 24%



    so yeah lowest winning % was this year......16.7% is a bit crap.
  • maureensmaureens Posts: 13,667
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #18
    Sarah777 wrote: »
    Really embarrassing, winning with 16.7%

    He was put on 2nd out of 12 acts all Cowell's picks got the pimp spot he did well as obviously Wayne was who Cowell wanted to win( at a guess)And he still beat him. So I am pleased with that.
  • Ronell_DavisRonell_Davis Posts: 4,415
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #19
    Jasmin had a lot more support than I expected I should have voted for her .
  • TTTangoTTTango Posts: 7,619
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #20
    Fudd wrote: »
    Tumar KR finished second in their semi final as well.

    They could only put one through, and S&P got a far larger percentage of the vote. Tumar KR just beat balance by a small margin.
  • InMyArmsInMyArms Posts: 50,790
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #21
    TTTango wrote: »
    They could only put one through, and S&P got a far larger percentage of the vote. Tumar KR just beat balance by a small margin.

    But Tumar KR beat Shannon and Peter in the wildcard vote.
  • Slow_LorisSlow_Loris Posts: 24,876
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #22
    lauranceallen wrote: »
    Jules and matisse 23%

    Collabro 27%

    Attraction 27%

    Pudsey 39%

    Jai mcdowall 29%

    Spellbound 37%

    /diversity 24%



    so yeah lowest winning % was this year......16.7% is a bit crap.

    I don't think a low winning percentage indicates quality. It just means it was a more open final.
  • Sarah777Sarah777 Posts: 5,060
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #23
    maureens wrote: »
    He was put on 2nd out of 12 acts all Cowell's picks got the pimp spot he did well as obviously Wayne was who Cowell wanted to win( at a guess)And he still beat him. So I am pleased with that.

    I am also happy that he won. Really surprised about the %. Like you said, the best slots were given to Simon's favourites. I also think, Richard's performance today was not his best.
  • lovecat86lovecat86 Posts: 8,501
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #24
    DamienS wrote: »
    Why put Richard on second when he smashed his semi?

    Didn't seem to dampen his chances.
  • lovecat86lovecat86 Posts: 8,501
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #25
    Ronell_Davis wrote: »
    Jasmin had a lot more support than I expected I should have voted for her .

    I did because I voted with my heart but I really didn't expect her to be in the running at all (not because of her talent but because I didn't expect the public to appreciate her).
  • CaroUKCaroUK Posts: 6,354
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #26
    Possibly Tumar KR werent wildcards because they had already gone home and there wasn't time/ it was too expensive to bring them back?
Sign In or Register to comment.