As you can see, the files are about the same size. The MP4 has the 'lines' effect and the picture also breaks up more when the camera pans.
I tried the MP4 conversion with a higher bitrate but it didn't seem to make any difference, at least until I got the file sizes higher than the Xvid conversion, which make it pointless, of course.
It can be hard to see in a small window on the PC, I did my viewing test on a 40" TV.
As you can see, the files are about the same size. The MP4 has the 'lines' effect and the picture also breaks up more when the camera pans.
I tried the MP4 conversion with a higher bitrate but it didn't seem to make any difference, at least until I got the file sizes higher than the Xvid conversion, which make it pointless, of course.
It can be hard to see in a small window on the PC, I did my viewing test on a 40" TV.
On my 1920x1080 27 inch PC monitor they are both very watchable but the XVID/avi is better. There is no picture breakup on either but I can sometimes see interlacing lines on quick movements, on the h.264/mp4.
This is because you seem to have changed the frame rate from 24 to 30 fps but on the XVID/avi you have not. The encoder has inserted fields as necessary (possibly as frames) to achieve this and they are particularly noticeable as interlacing lines on fast movement. So, re-do it at the original frame rate if your TV can handle it, or if it can't, re-do both of them at 25 fps (in the UK).
You have used baseline h.264 with CABAC off on your mp4 encode, so choose the higher setting to get the CABAC on (that's designed for HD but I do it anyway).
You've also used variable frame rate on the mp4/h.264, it's probably better to fix it at the original framerate (24 fps, well 23.976 or whatever).
And the h.264/mp4 is done at a higher resolution than the XVID (700x416 versus 600x402) so you can increase it on the h.264 for a fairer comparison.
The poor h.264/mp4 had no chance with that little lot and should improve when you've fixed them. If there are then any remaining issues, try again with deinterlace switched on during the encode - but that may not be necessary.
Hope that helps!
PS if my description of the picture doesn't sound as bad as what you see, please post a screen shot of each of the worst bits of the videos you posted.
After watching the two clips, it looks like it's interlaced. I had this before choosing a deinterlacing filter with one of my encodes and choosing a filter that deinterlaced it fixed it. If you used the same encoder for them both then.....I'm baffled.
On my 1920x1080 27 inch PC monitor they are both very watchable but the XVID/avi is better. There is no picture breakup on either but I can sometimes see interlacing lines on quick movements, on the h.264/mp4.
This is because you seem to have changed the frame rate from 24 to 30 fps but on the XVID/avi you have not. The encoder has inserted fields as necessary (possibly as frames) to achieve this and they are particularly noticeable as interlacing lines on fast movement. So, re-do it at the original frame rate if your TV can handle it, or if it can't, re-do both of them at 25 fps (in the UK).
You have used baseline h.264 with CABAC off on your mp4 encode, so choose the higher setting to get the CABAC on (that's designed for HD but I do it anyway).
You've also used variable frame rate on the mp4/h.264, it's probably better to fix it at the original framerate (24 fps, well 23.976 or whatever).
And the h.264/mp4 is done at a higher resolution than the XVID (700x416 versus 600x402) so you can increase it on the h.264 for a fairer comparison.
The poor h.264/mp4 had no chance with that little lot and should improve when you've fixed them. If there are then any remaining issues, try again with deinterlace switched on during the encode - but that may not be necessary.
Hope that helps!
PS if my description of the picture doesn't sound as bad as what you see, please post a screen shot of each of the worst bits of the videos you posted.
Except that part of it's wrong I mixed up the resolutions, it's the other way round (the XVID is higher resolution). And you said it more succinctly as interlacing artifacts is the main problem and should be entirely fixable by deinterlacing the original video and further improved on h.264 by doing the other things.
the settings for the avc file are all wrong. it should not be using Baseline@L3.0 it should be High@L4.1, you want b frames, cabac, more ref frames. a constant frame rate. and possibly less audio bandwidth.
is there any way you can chuck me a source file so i can show you what it should be like?
Yeah, one of the larger VOB files off the original DVD would help (or the last one, which may be smaller).
But to add, it would be useful for Loobster to d/l and install MediaInfo http://mediaarea.net/en/MediaInfo, then right-click (via the O/S file manager e.g. Windows Explorer) on one of the main VOB files on the DVD, open MediaInfo, choose "View -> Text", copy the detailed results and post the complete list here. Then we could advise on which specific settings to try.
For example, there is currently a conflict on what frame rate to use and that would be resolved as well as the other things mentioned. There's too much guesswork having to be done at the moment.
The encoder has inserted fields as necessary (possibly as frames) to achieve this and they are particularly noticeable as interlacing lines on fast movement. So, re-do it at the original frame rate if your TV can handle it, or if it can't, re-do both of them at 25 fps (in the UK).
You have used baseline h.264 with CABAC off on your mp4 encode, so choose the higher setting to get the CABAC on (that's designed for HD but I do it anyway).
You've also used variable frame rate on the mp4/h.264, it's probably better to fix it at the original framerate (24 fps, well 23.976 or whatever).
And the h.264/mp4 is done at a higher resolution than the XVID (700x416 versus 600x402) so you can increase it on the h.264 for a fairer comparison.
The poor h.264/mp4 had no chance with that little lot and should improve when you've fixed them. If there are then any remaining issues, try again with deinterlace switched on during the encode - but that may not be necessary.
I'll need some guidance translating that into a Handbrake profile that works.
If anyone has any recommendations for good reading material on this subject, that would be great.
it would be useful for Loobster to d/l and install MediaInfo http://mediaarea.net/en/MediaInfo, then right-click (via the O/S file manager e.g. Windows Explorer) on one of the main VOB files on the DVD, open MediaInfo, choose "View -> Text", copy the detailed results and post the complete list here.
General
Complete name : <filepath>\original-mpeg2.VOB
Format : MPEG-PS
File size : 1.86 GiB
Duration : 44mn 15s
Overall bit rate mode : Variable
Overall bit rate : 6 019 Kbps
Video
ID : 224 (0xE0)
Format : MPEG Video
Format version : Version 2
Format profile : Main@Main
Format settings, BVOP : Yes
Format settings, Matrix : Custom
Format settings, GOP : Variable
Duration : 343ms
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 5 324 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 9 800 Kbps
Width : 720 pixels
Height : 480 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Standard : Component
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Interlaced
Scan order : Top Field First
Compression mode : Lossy
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.514
Time code of first frame : 00:59:59;00
Time code source : Group of pictures header
Stream size : 217 KiB (0%)
Color primaries : BT.601 NTSC
Transfer characteristics : BT.601
Matrix coefficients : BT.601
Audio #1
ID : 189 (0xBD)-128 (0x80)
Format : AC-3
Format/Info : Audio Coding 3
Format profile : Dolby Digital
Mode extension : CM (complete main)
Format settings, Endianness : Big
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Duration : 44mn 15s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 192 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 16 bits
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 60.8 MiB (3%)
Audio #2
ID : 189 (0xBD)-129 (0x81)
Format : AC-3
Format/Info : Audio Coding 3
Format profile : Dolby Digital
Mode extension : CM (complete main)
Format settings, Endianness : Big
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Duration : 44mn 15s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 192 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 16 bits
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 60.8 MiB (3%)
Audio #3
ID : 189 (0xBD)-130 (0x82)
Format : AC-3
Format/Info : Audio Coding 3
Format profile : Dolby Digital
Mode extension : CM (complete main)
Format settings, Endianness : Big
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Duration : 44mn 15s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 192 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 16 bits
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 60.8 MiB (3%)
Text #1
ID : 189 (0xBD)-32 (0x20)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #2
ID : 189 (0xBD)-33 (0x21)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #3
ID : 189 (0xBD)-34 (0x22)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #4
ID : 189 (0xBD)-35 (0x23)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #5
ID : 189 (0xBD)-36 (0x24)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #6
ID : 189 (0xBD)-37 (0x25)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #7
ID : 189 (0xBD)-38 (0x26)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #8
ID : 189 (0xBD)-39 (0x27)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #9
ID : 224 (0xE0)-CC3
Format : EIA-608
Muxing mode, more info : Muxed in Video #1
Bit rate mode : Constant
Stream size : 0.00 Byte (0%)
No sir. The original material is 30fps, as is the MP4. AutoGK appears to have reduced this to 24fps during the Xvid conversion.
Oops, I should have asked first! .
But now I've seen your DVD original (thanks for the VOB) I'm sure the original original material is 24 fps movie-style, which has been converted to 29.97 fps (let's just say 30) for the US DVD using 3:2 pulldown. AutoGK has cleverly undone the 3:2 pulldown by using reverse telecine, so that's going to produce the best picture, albeit at a slightly higher bitrate for equivalent compression quality if using XVID. But as you are compressing 20% fewer frames, the bitrate differences between XVID and h.264 for similar quality should be small. If you can get AutoGK to use h.264, so much the better but if it was me, I'd accept a slightly higher bitrate XVID conversion with reverse-telecine back to 24-ish fps as per AutoGK (which you seem to have done already).
Alternatively, if Handbrake can do reverse telecine (I haven't checked) you can set it accordingly and use that. And don't forget that some TVs have a reverse telecine (cinemotion etc. mode) option anyway so if yours has, set it accordingly so you could use the h.264 30 fps version. There are ways of achieving both - but I'd keep it simple so if AutoGK works for you, I'd use that.
Don't much have to worry about doing reverse telecine over here in the UK because they generally speed up 24 fps films to 25 fps for TV/DVD, using all the original frames untouched!
Hmmm, didn't know that, cheers. Changing the framerate to 23.976 with detelecine (default setting) seems to work well in handbrake. Should be able to get well below 1Mbps using h.264 main or high profile and still have a decent picture.
AutoGK identifies the video as pure film and acts accordingly and fully automatically. But it's XVID and frankly, I wouldn't go below 1Mbps for that on good 720x480 widescreen material. 1.4Mbps as produced by the autoGK "75% quality" setting suits my eyes better on a 27 inch full HD screen but that's down to personal preference, as always.
If on further testing, handbrake does the job as it seems to (at detelecine + 23.976 fps), I'd now use that at whatever bitrate works based on personal preference of the results.
If on further testing, handbrake does the job as it seems to (at detelecine + 23.976 fps), I'd now use that at whatever bitrate works based on personal preference of the results.
I used Handbrake at minimum 600x360@850Kbps with detelecine on 'Default' and it pumped out a video at 600x402@850Kbps, but at 25.473fps.
Does it auto-choose the framerate? Or is that what the detelecine function is doing.
Either way, the resulting video is smaller and better than the Xvid.
So what types of source material benefit from the detelecine function? Or can I just leave it on for everything?
I'm running a conversion of the full show now using default detelecine, 23.976fps, 800kbps bitrate. I'll compare it to the Xvid tomorrow.
I used Handbrake at minimum 600x360@850Kbps with detelecine on 'Default' and it pumped out a video at 600x402@850Kbps, but at 25.473fps.
Does it auto-choose the framerate? Or is that what the detelecine function is doing.
Either way, the resulting video is smaller and better than the Xvid.
Settings I'd use (as I'd want a full resolution video at maximum quality):
Picture tab
Profile: High
Container: mp4
Large File Size: (ticked)
Cropping: Custom (change all 4 boxes to 0 )
Size: (should show Width 720, Height None)
Anamorphic: (should show Loose)
Modulus: (should show 2)
Display Size: (should show 853 x 480)
Filters tab
Detelecine: Default
All others: Off.
Video Tab
Video Codec: h.264
Framerate: 23.976
Constant Framerate: choose this.
Optimise Video: Ignore
Quality: Constant Quality: default (20 RF) **
** If you prefer, choose Avg bitrate, at whatever rate you want. Using Constant Quality (20 RF) produces an average video bitrate of around 979Mbps.
Audio
Audio Tracks: AC3 Passthru (close the other box). ***
*** Or choose any audio stream and bitrate you want.
That's what I'd do anyway, you get full resolution frames at 480 lines vertical. Slightly higher bitrates than you might want but superb video quality and untouched audio all for around 1.1 Mbps in all. When you like it, Add the 'user profile' to Handbrake with your settings, for any future similar films.
Conversion on my 4 core AMD machine took 22 seconds for your 1 minute sample. Framerate ended up as 24.000, which is exactly where it should be. Filesize 8.43 MBytes (your original is 41.8 MBytes).
So what types of source material benefit from the detelecine function? Or can I just leave it on for everything?
Original movie material shot at 24 fps is what it's for, so if you suspect that on a 30fps DVD or TV recording, and you see interlacing lines and/or jerkyness, try the detelicine (=inverse/reverse telecine) option. I don't know if you can leave it on all the time as I have to use it so rarely over here, but I wouldn't leave it on unless I needed it. Try it and see!
^I always use slow under optimise video. I suppose people have their own way of doing things though. I set the two down below to automatic. I don't use the advanced settings now. I just let Handbrake choose.
Comments
I do not know how, can you share it? I'm very interested to learn it.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_qgQ9jq039Zd1U0cFBwQWZBaWs/edit?usp=sharing
As you can see, the files are about the same size. The MP4 has the 'lines' effect and the picture also breaks up more when the camera pans.
I tried the MP4 conversion with a higher bitrate but it didn't seem to make any difference, at least until I got the file sizes higher than the Xvid conversion, which make it pointless, of course.
It can be hard to see in a small window on the PC, I did my viewing test on a 40" TV.
Its very obvious on a 17'' , yes worse when the camera pans.
Xvid wins easily.
On my 1920x1080 27 inch PC monitor they are both very watchable but the XVID/avi is better. There is no picture breakup on either but I can sometimes see interlacing lines on quick movements, on the h.264/mp4.
This is because you seem to have changed the frame rate from 24 to 30 fps but on the XVID/avi you have not. The encoder has inserted fields as necessary (possibly as frames) to achieve this and they are particularly noticeable as interlacing lines on fast movement. So, re-do it at the original frame rate if your TV can handle it, or if it can't, re-do both of them at 25 fps (in the UK).
You have used baseline h.264 with CABAC off on your mp4 encode, so choose the higher setting to get the CABAC on (that's designed for HD but I do it anyway).
You've also used variable frame rate on the mp4/h.264, it's probably better to fix it at the original framerate (24 fps, well 23.976 or whatever).
And the h.264/mp4 is done at a higher resolution than the XVID (700x416 versus 600x402) so you can increase it on the h.264 for a fairer comparison.
The poor h.264/mp4 had no chance with that little lot and should improve when you've fixed them. If there are then any remaining issues, try again with deinterlace switched on during the encode - but that may not be necessary.
Hope that helps!
PS if my description of the picture doesn't sound as bad as what you see, please post a screen shot of each of the worst bits of the videos you posted.
I suppose this says it better.
Except that part of it's wrong I mixed up the resolutions, it's the other way round (the XVID is higher resolution). And you said it more succinctly as interlacing artifacts is the main problem and should be entirely fixable by deinterlacing the original video and further improved on h.264 by doing the other things.
http://postimg.org/image/n4isuimfn/
the settings for the avc file are all wrong. it should not be using Baseline@L3.0 it should be High@L4.1, you want b frames, cabac, more ref frames. a constant frame rate. and possibly less audio bandwidth.
is there any way you can chuck me a source file so i can show you what it should be like?
But to add, it would be useful for Loobster to d/l and install MediaInfo http://mediaarea.net/en/MediaInfo, then right-click (via the O/S file manager e.g. Windows Explorer) on one of the main VOB files on the DVD, open MediaInfo, choose "View -> Text", copy the detailed results and post the complete list here. Then we could advise on which specific settings to try.
For example, there is currently a conflict on what frame rate to use and that would be resolved as well as the other things mentioned. There's too much guesswork having to be done at the moment.
No sir. The original material is 30fps, as is the MP4. AutoGK appears to have reduced this to 24fps during the Xvid conversion.
I'll need some guidance translating that into a Handbrake profile that works.
If anyone has any recommendations for good reading material on this subject, that would be great.
General
Complete name : <filepath>\original-mpeg2.VOB
Format : MPEG-PS
File size : 1.86 GiB
Duration : 44mn 15s
Overall bit rate mode : Variable
Overall bit rate : 6 019 Kbps
Video
ID : 224 (0xE0)
Format : MPEG Video
Format version : Version 2
Format profile : Main@Main
Format settings, BVOP : Yes
Format settings, Matrix : Custom
Format settings, GOP : Variable
Duration : 343ms
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 5 324 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 9 800 Kbps
Width : 720 pixels
Height : 480 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Standard : Component
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Interlaced
Scan order : Top Field First
Compression mode : Lossy
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.514
Time code of first frame : 00:59:59;00
Time code source : Group of pictures header
Stream size : 217 KiB (0%)
Color primaries : BT.601 NTSC
Transfer characteristics : BT.601
Matrix coefficients : BT.601
Audio #1
ID : 189 (0xBD)-128 (0x80)
Format : AC-3
Format/Info : Audio Coding 3
Format profile : Dolby Digital
Mode extension : CM (complete main)
Format settings, Endianness : Big
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Duration : 44mn 15s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 192 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 16 bits
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 60.8 MiB (3%)
Audio #2
ID : 189 (0xBD)-129 (0x81)
Format : AC-3
Format/Info : Audio Coding 3
Format profile : Dolby Digital
Mode extension : CM (complete main)
Format settings, Endianness : Big
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Duration : 44mn 15s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 192 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 16 bits
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 60.8 MiB (3%)
Audio #3
ID : 189 (0xBD)-130 (0x82)
Format : AC-3
Format/Info : Audio Coding 3
Format profile : Dolby Digital
Mode extension : CM (complete main)
Format settings, Endianness : Big
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Duration : 44mn 15s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 192 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 16 bits
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 60.8 MiB (3%)
Text #1
ID : 189 (0xBD)-32 (0x20)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #2
ID : 189 (0xBD)-33 (0x21)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #3
ID : 189 (0xBD)-34 (0x22)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #4
ID : 189 (0xBD)-35 (0x23)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #5
ID : 189 (0xBD)-36 (0x24)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #6
ID : 189 (0xBD)-37 (0x25)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #7
ID : 189 (0xBD)-38 (0x26)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #8
ID : 189 (0xBD)-39 (0x27)
Format : RLE
Format/Info : Run-length encoding
Muxing mode : DVD-Video
Text #9
ID : 224 (0xE0)-CC3
Format : EIA-608
Muxing mode, more info : Muxed in Video #1
Bit rate mode : Constant
Stream size : 0.00 Byte (0%)
Menu
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_qgQ9jq039ZdzJaT24tQUtxU1E/edit?usp=sharing
just to show what avc can do i have encoded that file at 600kbps
http://ul.to/upto49g8
and a 1000kbps.
http://ul.to/7i0b1lb3
both with the frame rate at 23.976
and here at 29.970
http://ul.to/hbblhhbo
the 600kbps one is only 5MB and looks great to me
what is it out of curiosity
Edit: It works perfectly as well.
https://trac.handbrake.fr/wiki/DeinterlacingGuide#deinterlacing
Oops, I should have asked first! .
But now I've seen your DVD original (thanks for the VOB) I'm sure the original original material is 24 fps movie-style, which has been converted to 29.97 fps (let's just say 30) for the US DVD using 3:2 pulldown. AutoGK has cleverly undone the 3:2 pulldown by using reverse telecine, so that's going to produce the best picture, albeit at a slightly higher bitrate for equivalent compression quality if using XVID. But as you are compressing 20% fewer frames, the bitrate differences between XVID and h.264 for similar quality should be small. If you can get AutoGK to use h.264, so much the better but if it was me, I'd accept a slightly higher bitrate XVID conversion with reverse-telecine back to 24-ish fps as per AutoGK (which you seem to have done already).
Alternatively, if Handbrake can do reverse telecine (I haven't checked) you can set it accordingly and use that. And don't forget that some TVs have a reverse telecine (cinemotion etc. mode) option anyway so if yours has, set it accordingly so you could use the h.264 30 fps version. There are ways of achieving both - but I'd keep it simple so if AutoGK works for you, I'd use that.
Don't much have to worry about doing reverse telecine over here in the UK because they generally speed up 24 fps films to 25 fps for TV/DVD, using all the original frames untouched!
AutoGK identifies the video as pure film and acts accordingly and fully automatically. But it's XVID and frankly, I wouldn't go below 1Mbps for that on good 720x480 widescreen material. 1.4Mbps as produced by the autoGK "75% quality" setting suits my eyes better on a 27 inch full HD screen but that's down to personal preference, as always.
If on further testing, handbrake does the job as it seems to (at detelecine + 23.976 fps), I'd now use that at whatever bitrate works based on personal preference of the results.
Those samples all look good to me. I appreciate you taking the time to test it.
It's 'The Pretender', season 3, episode 3.
I used Handbrake at minimum 600x360@850Kbps with detelecine on 'Default' and it pumped out a video at 600x402@850Kbps, but at 25.473fps.
Does it auto-choose the framerate? Or is that what the detelecine function is doing.
Either way, the resulting video is smaller and better than the Xvid.
So what types of source material benefit from the detelecine function? Or can I just leave it on for everything?
I'm running a conversion of the full show now using default detelecine, 23.976fps, 800kbps bitrate. I'll compare it to the Xvid tomorrow.
which may sound like i'm taking the piss, but really i'm not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivtc
Settings I'd use (as I'd want a full resolution video at maximum quality):
Picture tab
Profile: High
Container: mp4
Large File Size: (ticked)
Cropping: Custom (change all 4 boxes to 0 )
Size: (should show Width 720, Height None)
Anamorphic: (should show Loose)
Modulus: (should show 2)
Display Size: (should show 853 x 480)
Filters tab
Detelecine: Default
All others: Off.
Video Tab
Video Codec: h.264
Framerate: 23.976
Constant Framerate: choose this.
Optimise Video: Ignore
Quality: Constant Quality: default (20 RF) **
** If you prefer, choose Avg bitrate, at whatever rate you want. Using Constant Quality (20 RF) produces an average video bitrate of around 979Mbps.
Audio
Audio Tracks: AC3 Passthru (close the other box). ***
*** Or choose any audio stream and bitrate you want.
That's what I'd do anyway, you get full resolution frames at 480 lines vertical. Slightly higher bitrates than you might want but superb video quality and untouched audio all for around 1.1 Mbps in all. When you like it, Add the 'user profile' to Handbrake with your settings, for any future similar films.
Conversion on my 4 core AMD machine took 22 seconds for your 1 minute sample. Framerate ended up as 24.000, which is exactly where it should be. Filesize 8.43 MBytes (your original is 41.8 MBytes).
Original movie material shot at 24 fps is what it's for, so if you suspect that on a 30fps DVD or TV recording, and you see interlacing lines and/or jerkyness, try the detelicine (=inverse/reverse telecine) option. I don't know if you can leave it on all the time as I have to use it so rarely over here, but I wouldn't leave it on unless I needed it. Try it and see!