Options
Daybreak No More ?
ftv
Posts: 31,668
Forum Member
✭✭✭
ITV blosses are considering changing the name of their breakfast show because Daybreak is so closely associated with failure, according to The Sun. Apparently staff on the programme now answer the phones with ''ITV Breakfast'' and not Daybreak. Any suggestions - they could call it Wake Up with Wogan (no, I know he's not on it but might get them more viewers:D)
0
Comments
Daybroken
Eamonn Holmes on Sky Sunrise called it "Dawn of the Dead".
For clarity is this the Eamonn Holmes who was going to present the show until he was told his services would not be required?
Dont know if your interested Suffolkblue but I got MUTV for £3 a month off Sky, you can watch Paddy Crerand with your breakfast .
:D:cool:
I would not be surprised if Eamonn Holmes and Ruth Langsford moved to Daybreak (itv seems so pre-occupied with chemistry and couples) and then we could send Adrian and Christine to This Morning for Fridays only.
It could be the same Eamonn Holmes who was never even approached by ITV re Daybreak.I always remember when he was on the Lottery show (before the BBC got rid of him) and a protestor appeared on camera. Holmes bolted behind a young girl (I think the adjudicator) who was on stage.I believe his programme is lucky to get an audience of 100,000 and the ratings actually go up when he's off:D
he would need an entire chorus line to hide behind!
The strike meant BBC Breakfast was a little less lively today. Try it on a day when it isn't directly affected by industrial action.
Actually he said Daybreak was still worse than Breakfast - with the presenters and a load of support staff missing!
Daybreak.
If the producers of Daybreak were smart (not that they appear to have made many clever decisions thus far) they would embrace the joke and run with it. E.g. when the film is due to come out here, start an episode with Bleakley and Chiles each watching it and taking notes, or re-enacting a scene from it as part of the Daybreak programme. They should not pretend that people won't see the film's premise and make the obvious connection. They could show viewers that they: a) have a sense of humour; b) acknowledge the programme's own shortcomings; c) don't think their audience are morons (something they got spectacularly wrong with that insulting phone-in competition the first week) and will get the joke.
Not that any of that will happen, of course.
I know, I misread, my mistake
Or, indeed, at the best of times?