Don't eat my food then!
trevvytrev21
Posts: 16,973 Forum Member
✭✭
Can't believe Jim told Linda to to stop eating dinner due to their disagreement. Very controlling behaviour. Can't stand Linda, but I'm glad she stood her ground.
Controlling the kitchen/food was a tactic exploited by Carol/e BB8.
His game seems to crumbling quite rapidly. The slip-ups are occurring daily.
Controlling the kitchen/food was a tactic exploited by Carol/e BB8.
His game seems to crumbling quite rapidly. The slip-ups are occurring daily.
0
Comments
yeah, I think that is Jims problem .... he is a controller & he comes to blows with Linda & Luisa, especially, because neither of them are ever going to allow him to control them
Don't know what show your watching,if anything I would say he is getting more popular.
In most other instances I wholeheartedly agree, not tonight though.
Jim is very popular and I think he will win. I don't understand what that has to do with this thread.
Is Jim suggesting he should be able to control who eats a meal in there if he cooks it? That's very strange...
WTF.
Jim was simply stating that if Linda did not want him to be nice to her at all then why didn't that include her refusing to eat any food he had cooked for her. He was pointing out that her principles only go as far as her own convenience because as soon as her principles required her to cook her own meal rather than accept one from Jim then she suddenly didn't see a need to refuse Jim's cooking. Hypocrisy, plain and simple.
That's obviously exactly what he meant but certain people are choosing to act ignorant towards it.
Yeah, that's very strange. Imagine what it'd be like if someone was the cause of the house being put on basic rations and then refused to cook for two of the housemates.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2540169/Celebrity-Big-Brother-Lionel-Blair-blasts-Luisa-Zissman-finding-rule-breaking.html
There's a pattern to Jim's behaviour. He often chastises other housemates for how they cook. He even went as far to embarrassingly demonstrate to (I think) Ollie and Dappy how to cook something. Also taking over from Luisa and criticising what she was doing.
It's a subtle undercurrent of control, and this wasn't an isolated incident. Need I mention cherry brandy, starvation solidarity and all those other things, too.,?
He meant his food as in he cooked it. She can't take a knife but can stuff her fat face with the food he's had his hands all over. What a hypocritical twisted old bat.
He wasn't suggesting that he should control who eat the food he cooked. That is a gross misrepresentation of the argument. He was questioning her CHOICE to eat the food Jim had prepared as hypocritical. NOT implying that he could decide for her.
That's what I saw. Also it was interesting he mentioned that she has never coooked, or made anything for him the whole time he has been in the house - not even a cup of tea! She just keeps at him:(
I'm not disagreeing with that even slightly, if you look at the article in the link. I'm trying to draw the OP's attention to the glaring hypocrisy of his comments in relation to Jim.
It looked like Luisa was pouring half a ton of salt over the spuds, so she needed stopping.