Options

BBC hits new low-Hungar games.

TracyTracy Posts: 6,229
Forum Member
BBC to pit low-paid against each other in Hunger Games-style show to find Britain's Hardest Grafter



The BBC will make the unemployed and low-paid workers compete against each other for a cash prize in a controversial Hunger Games-type show to find “Britain’s Hardest Grafter”.

Only the UK’s lowest-paid workers will be invited to compete to “show their worth” in the reality show, capitalising on the trend for “poverty porn” established by the Channel 4 series, Benefits Street.

Applications for Britain’s Hardest Grafter, which will be screened on BBC2, are limited to those currently earning less than £15,500 per year.

The BBC is seeking 25 British workers, a mix of the unemployed, the under-employed and those earning the minimum wage, who will be given the opportunity to “prove themselves” through a series of challenges. A cash prize is on offer for the winner.

A representative of the production company Twenty Twenty told the website Graduate Fog: “In each episode, people will be put to the test in a series of challenges and tasks.

“At the end of each episode, those who have produced the least will be eliminated and by the end of the process, just one worker will remain. The winner will receive in the region of £15,000 which is a year’s living wage (outside of London).”

An advert for applicants asks “Have you been out of work since leaving school? Are you sick of living off your parents? Are you losing out on jobs because you’ve got no experience? Have you got a degree but not a graduate job?” The producers are seeking “people who feel passionately about the issues in the UK today”. The series will investigate “what effects people in the workplace”.

The producers, previously responsible for Benefits Britain 1949, in which claimants volunteered to live by the rules of the first year of the welfare state, asked Graduate Fog to publicise the show on its website “so we can attract more graduates who are struggling to secure a decent living wage.”

Twenty Twenty said participants would be paid a compensatory figure “not below the national minimum wage” for the length of their contribution to the programme.

Graduate Fog questioned whether the show would simply “exploit desperate young workers for entertainment value.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/bbc-to-pit-lowpaid-against-each-other-in-hunger-gamesstyle-show-to-find-britains-hardest-grafter-10279386.html
«1

Comments

  • Options
    plateletplatelet Posts: 26,386
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sounds like the apprentice - probably with less irritating contestants
  • Options
    firefly_irlfirefly_irl Posts: 4,015
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Its like a Charles Dickens novel meets reality TV
  • Options
    snafu65snafu65 Posts: 18,217
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Are they going to be hunting each other with bow and arrow and knives and last man standing wins? No.

    Then it's not Hunger Games like, sounds more like I'm Unemployed Get Me Out Of Here.
  • Options
    GrahameSteeleGrahameSteele Posts: 1,380
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Just when you think this country could not get any lower...
  • Options
    holly berryholly berry Posts: 14,287
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    It's exploitative poverty porn and something one associates with Channels 4 & 5, not the BBC.

    What next - A competition to get your family out of Gaza? Syrians competing for the chance for their family to be fed for a year in a refugee camp in Jordan?

    If the BBC is using licence fee money to commission this material it really is time for an end to the licence fee. If people want to watch this type of programme they can subscribe to it or watch adverts to pay for it.
  • Options
    gasheadgashead Posts: 13,822
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Tracy wrote: »
    “At the end of each episode, those who have produced the least will be eliminated and by the end of the process, just one worker will remain. The winner will receive in the region of £15,000 which is a year’s living wage (outside of London).”
    So...a show that will un-doubtedly be spun as being to the benefit of the un-employed and low waged by teaching them new skills or highlighting their existing ones has a cash prize not entirely dissimilar to what they're already 'earning'? So basically, a year's 'salary'. No, I can't see a problem with that. For a second I was worried they'd get something really dubious, like an apprenticeship, training credits, or anything specifically targeted at pulling them out of the situation they're currently in. No, that's probably exploitative and illegal. Cash is always safest.

    Isn't this exactly the sort of show the BBC committed to phasing out several years ago? :confused:
  • Options
    pete137pete137 Posts: 18,392
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The Jeremy Kyle inbreds will lap it up.
  • Options
    Rich_LRich_L Posts: 6,110
    Forum Member
    Just when you think this country could not get any lower...

    Quick, somebody blame the Tories.
  • Options
    davelovesleedsdavelovesleeds Posts: 22,638
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I guess the presenter will probably be paid about £20,000 per episode too.
    More than those taking part could hope to earn in a year.
  • Options
    swb1964swb1964 Posts: 4,700
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Rich_L wrote: »
    Quick, somebody blame the Tories.

    I'm happy to do just that.

    And I'll blame the yellow and red tories as well while I'm at it!
  • Options
    beemohbeemoh Posts: 7,073
    Forum Member
    Rich_L wrote: »
    Quick, somebody blame the Tories.

    In fairness, it is their fault.
  • Options
    Doghouse RileyDoghouse Riley Posts: 32,491
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Was this a programme thought up by the director of "BBC Better?"

    "Yeah!
    No worries!
    Cool!"
  • Options
    snafu65snafu65 Posts: 18,217
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Actually it might give the Tories ideas, compete with other claimants for you benefits! :D
  • Options
    mike65mike65 Posts: 11,386
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The Beeb have missed a trick - they could combine Britain’s Hardest Grafter and Top Gear and end up with Death Race 2016.

    10 points for a causal fruit picker to 500 points if you mow down a third generation unemployed with more than 5 kids.
  • Options
    mivimivi Posts: 3,021
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I think it's a shockingly bad idea - really poor taste. Years ago the BBC made documentaries about life on the breadline, nowadays thy make cheap, exploitative 'reality' shows about the poor.

    Why not put rich people in there too? Let see if its hard work that made them rich, or inheritance or the right connections.
  • Options
    NaturalDancerNaturalDancer Posts: 5,152
    Forum Member
    Tracy wrote: »
    BBC to pit low-paid against each other in Hunger Games-style show to find Britain's Hardest Grafter



    The BBC will make the unemployed and low-paid workers compete against each other for a cash prize in a controversial Hunger Games-type show to find “Britain’s Hardest Grafter”.

    Only the UK’s lowest-paid workers will be invited to compete to “show their worth” in the reality show, capitalising on the trend for “poverty porn” established by the Channel 4 series, Benefits Street.

    Applications for Britain’s Hardest Grafter, which will be screened on BBC2, are limited to those currently earning less than £15,500 per year.

    The BBC is seeking 25 British workers, a mix of the unemployed, the under-employed and those earning the minimum wage, who will be given the opportunity to “prove themselves” through a series of challenges. A cash prize is on offer for the winner.

    A representative of the production company Twenty Twenty told the website Graduate Fog: “In each episode, people will be put to the test in a series of challenges and tasks.

    “At the end of each episode, those who have produced the least will be eliminated and by the end of the process, just one worker will remain. The winner will receive in the region of £15,000 which is a year’s living wage (outside of London).”

    An advert for applicants asks “Have you been out of work since leaving school? Are you sick of living off your parents? Are you losing out on jobs because you’ve got no experience? Have you got a degree but not a graduate job?” The producers are seeking “people who feel passionately about the issues in the UK today”. The series will investigate “what effects people in the workplace”.

    The producers, previously responsible for Benefits Britain 1949, in which claimants volunteered to live by the rules of the first year of the welfare state, asked Graduate Fog to publicise the show on its website “so we can attract more graduates who are struggling to secure a decent living wage.”

    Twenty Twenty said participants would be paid a compensatory figure “not below the national minimum wage” for the length of their contribution to the programme.

    Graduate Fog questioned whether the show would simply “exploit desperate young workers for entertainment value.”

    http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/bbc-to-pit-lowpaid-against-each-other-in-hunger-gamesstyle-show-to-find-britains-hardest-grafter-10279386.html

    What about pensioners on less than £15,000? I could do with £15,000, buy myself a canal boat :D
    It's exploitative poverty porn and something one associates with Channels 4 & 5, not the BBC.

    What next - A competition to get your family out of Gaza? Syrians competing for the chance for their family to be fed for a year in a refugee camp in Jordan?

    If the BBC is using licence fee money to commission this material it really is time for an end to the licence fee. If people want to watch this type of programme they can subscribe to it or watch adverts to pay for it.

    I agree.
    snafu65 wrote: »
    Actually it might give the Tories ideas, compete with other claimants for you benefits! :D

    :D
    mivi wrote: »
    I think it's a shockingly bad idea - really poor taste. Years ago the BBC made documentaries about life on the breadline, nowadays thy make cheap, exploitative 'reality' shows about the poor.

    Why not put rich people in there too? Let see if its hard work that made them rich, or inheritance or the right connections.

    Good idea!
  • Options
    EStaffs90EStaffs90 Posts: 13,722
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    snafu65 wrote: »
    Are they going to be hunting each other with bow and arrow and knives and last man standing wins? No.

    Then it's not Hunger Games like, sounds more like I'm Unemployed Get Me Out Of Here.

    I lolled at this comment. :D:D:D
  • Options
    tghe-retfordtghe-retford Posts: 26,449
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Hunger Games, to quote IMDB is a film where "Katniss Everdeen voluntarily takes her younger sister's place in the Hunger Games, a televised fight to the death in which two teenagers from each of the twelve Districts of Panem are chosen at random to compete."

    The way the hard left wing media are portraying things, it make it sounds like Iain Duncan Smith is going to shoot the person who is to be "eliminated" in the head! Actually, knowing IDS, I wouldn't put it past him!

    I'm no fan of 'poverty porn' and seeing the poor being exploited and slurred for ratings but I also no fan of clickbait headlines and grossly hyperbolic news reporting - 'Hunger Games style show'... really?

    http://graduatefog.co.uk/2015/4058/britains-hardest-grafter-worker-bbc-hunger-games-style-reality-tv-show-young-unemployed/

    And unsurprising the Daily Mail has naturally turned it into an attack on the BBC. If this programme was commissioned on Channel 4 or 5 I'd bet we wouldn't hear a peep out of them.
  • Options
    jonbwfcjonbwfc Posts: 18,050
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    BBC hits new low-Hungar games
    Unfortunately so does DS forumer's ability to spell properly.
  • Options
    Prince MonaluluPrince Monalulu Posts: 35,900
    Forum Member
    Doesn't sound like the Hunger Games to me, rest of the article seems like bollox too.
    Have to wait and see what the program is like.
    Might well be a lesson in the program for some of those who think anyone in a low paid job or on the dole must be a lazy, dopey waster.

    I don't watch any of the Benefit, Scrounger or similar in the title programs, don't need that in my life.
  • Options
    carl.waringcarl.waring Posts: 35,713
    Forum Member
    Nice to see that there's no prejudice going on here; ie pre-judging anything. Like, say, a TV show that hasn't even begun production yet, let alone actually been made or shown!

    (With the exception of the post just before mine, that is :))

    Of course. even when it is eventually shown, no-one is forcing you to watch it.
  • Options
    CravenHavenCravenHaven Posts: 13,953
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Tracy wrote: »
    Only the UK’s lowest-paid workers will be invited to compete to “show their worth” in the reality show, capitalising on the trend for “poverty porn” established by the Channel 4 series, Benefits Street.
    I've got a radical idea. Instead of cutting the footage to make downtrodden Joe Bloggs look workshy on exploitation TV, when not make a reality show about reality show contestants trying to show their worth in real life when they're not getting appearance fees. First up "Curry" Katona.
    :kitty:
  • Options
    mivimivi Posts: 3,021
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nice to see that there's no prejudice going on here; ie pre-judging anything. Like, say, a TV show that hasn't even begun production yet, let alone actually been made or shown!

    (With the exception of the post just before mine, that is :))

    Of course. even when it is eventually shown, no-one is forcing you to watch it.

    That's a fair point Carl. I guess after the likes of Jeremy Kyle, Benefits Street, Saints and Scroungers, the 'White' series on the BBC, and On Benefits and Proud, people, like me are naturally wary of the way in which commissioners and programme makers depict people at the bottom of the pile. And fear, quite reasonably, that this television programme will be exploitative and humiliating; not the 'serious social experiment' that the programme makers claim it will be.
  • Options
    carl.waringcarl.waring Posts: 35,713
    Forum Member
    The one flaw in that theory is that all of those programmes were made by commercial stations for entertainment purposes. I am absolutely convinced that this will not be the case for this programme for the BBC.
  • Options
    Prince MonaluluPrince Monalulu Posts: 35,900
    Forum Member
    The one flaw in that theory is that all of those programmes were made by commercial stations for entertainment purposes. I am absolutely convinced that this will not be the case for this programme for the BBC.

    Saints and Scroungers is a BBC product.
    The BBC makes it's share of annoying $hite these days, not that I've seen the program, wouldn't want to either.
    BBC One is the home for this sort of low wattage populist, playing to the cheap seats cack, but I rarely watch BBC One these days.
Sign In or Register to comment.