Options
Title of First episode of new series
Davidus
Posts: 201
Forum Member
✭
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/articles/Asylum-of-the-Daleks
Just some new info for those of you who hadn't yet heard of it.
Asylum of the Daleks.
I'm just trying to fathom out how the story will interpret ALL daleks throughout history.
Should be fun finding out
Just some new info for those of you who hadn't yet heard of it.
Asylum of the Daleks.
I'm just trying to fathom out how the story will interpret ALL daleks throughout history.
Should be fun finding out
0
Comments
Not ALL Daleks. Individuals of all different types. My guess is that this 'asylum' houses Daleks who don't share the general Dalek outlook on life. Much like the prison ship in Doomsday, they would have been kept out of the Time War.
Hope the episode is a classic.
Of course, it could just as easilly mean 'asylum' as in 'seeking asylum'; after all, the Daleks are without a homeworld nowadays and could certainly do with a new one. And we've seen how crafty they can be in Power of the Daleks (and it's lame imitation 'Victory of the Daleks'); there could well be some foolish planet who will have them... it's about time we saw the Daleks in a real position of strength again and devastating worlds.
Knowing Moffat, it will probably have both meanings.
Victory of the Daleks featured, IMO, the Daleks getting one over on The Doctor and actually getting away with it. Hopefully we won't be straight back to "lots and lots of Daleks, most evil plan ever, getting destroyed by the end of the episode."
But, in Moffat I trust. The title suggests a Dalek story with... "more to it" if you get my meaning. The single episode Dalek stories have been my favorite so far..
It sounds like we may be getting another story about what it means to be Dalek, much like the Series 1 standalone episode - not a bad thing in my book.
Not a bad thing at all
I think emotional Daleks or overly pyschological Daleks is a wrong turn. This is a race that has evolved to be the ultimate killers. I don't think they'd even be capable of introspection. Evolution would have removed that from them.
I think we'll get lots of explosions and a lot of slam bang action, and for once in Doctor Who, I don't think that's a bad thing.
Definitely an episode "with more than meets the naked eye" definitely!
Cannot wait to see it....
Nazis or not, the best monsters in sci-fi exist because they reflect human psychology and give us an opportunity to examine, loathe or fear those parts of us.
Similarly, if this episode is about psychologically damaged Daleks, it would provide the opportunity to explore what it is that makes one not-Dalek.
Maybe that's why they've been put into an asylum. A building full of Daleks that only want to help, and make daisy-chains, and discuss poetry.
Agreed. But those parts of us that the Daleks represent is the unreasoning totalitariansm of fascism. You can't be introspective alongside that.
Evil of the Daleks was a story that manged to examine 'the Dalek factor' without having to order in counsellors for them.
I just don't think there's much to examine about them. Why does a fox kill chickens? Why does a spider spin it's web? They are what they are in ther nature to be. The Daleks are killing machines. I just don't think there's much mileage in over-analysing them.
But, that siad, i'm not fundamentaly opposed to such a story if its handled well. My instinct is jsut that it is better to go with action with the daleks, especially for a season opener.
As wonderful as that sounds, it would be strange for such Daleks to be put in an asylum, as opposed to just shot on the spot by their colleagues.
Well, this title is certainly full of intrigue, if nothing else.
Basically, make it a horror story!
And yet, some of the most classic stories come from exactly that angle - from Robert the Bruce to Charlotte's Web, Chicken Licken to Aesop's Fables. There's still interesting stuff to say about how the fox gets the chicken, or what the construction of the web entails.
Or both?
My money is on the former, but it would be just like Moffat to throw in some word teasing.
As someone else mentioned, I suspect it will mean both.