"I fear for the future of the BBC if the Conservatives win the next election" - RTD
carl.waring
Posts: 35,594
Forum Member
✭
Yes. I know! Another BBC-related thread. But we're going to have to keep having the discussion as the Charter renewal approaches. (Plus, this is the first time in a long time I've actually started one so it's kinda my turn )
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015-01-15/i-fear-for-the-future-of-the-bbc-if-the-conservatives-win-the-next-election-says-russell-t-davies
And he's absolutely right.
The problem is that we know the BBC won't defend itself so we need to help it out it.
Yes, it has tried a little recently - and I hope it continues - but unfortunately these "corrections" to stories (sorry... spin, twists and lies) don't get as much publicity as the stories themselves.
If anything we need an increase in the LF, not further cuts. Then we wouldn't need to threaten to make big changes a la BBC3; which I hope won't actually happen.
Yes; I know! "Subscription", "Adverts", etc. Neither of which will work for reasons already discussed ad nauseum.
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015-01-15/i-fear-for-the-future-of-the-bbc-if-the-conservatives-win-the-next-election-says-russell-t-davies
Russell T Davies says he fears for the BBC if a Conservative government wins the 2015 General Election.
The former Doctor Who showrunner claims that the Tory party has created a situation where the licence fee may never be increased and that the Corporation is now under genuine threat of extinction.
“When the Conservatives got in, practically the first visitor David Cameron had was Rupert Murdoch, practically the first thing they did was freeze the licence fee with no consultation whatsoever,” Davies told a Broadcasting Press Guild lunch today. “They attacked it immediately."
“If they win the next election they will do the same thing again. [The BBC] is under constant attack now. We are in a situation where the licence fee will never go up. I cannot imagine a rise being allowed now. And I genuinely believe in the BBC for its cultural worth. I think it is a magnificent powerhouse and I fear for it.
And he's absolutely right.
The problem is that we know the BBC won't defend itself so we need to help it out it.
Yes, it has tried a little recently - and I hope it continues - but unfortunately these "corrections" to stories (sorry... spin, twists and lies) don't get as much publicity as the stories themselves.
If anything we need an increase in the LF, not further cuts. Then we wouldn't need to threaten to make big changes a la BBC3; which I hope won't actually happen.
Yes; I know! "Subscription", "Adverts", etc. Neither of which will work for reasons already discussed ad nauseum.
0
Comments
Totally agree.
More Americanisation crap I know, but the subject of the thread is much more important.
And not forgetting the fact the LF was frozen and then had to fund S4C ontop of that and THEN the World Service too!
The Tories have this hatred for anything such as the BBC and NHS, look at the state of both under this Government.
The BBC will never be the same again under another Tory Government. Thats a sad fact
Not entirely sure why this needs its own thread, anyway. High-profile left-winger who recieved a major career boost from the BBC doesn't want the Tories to form the next government and also doesn't want the BBC to need to make any further cuts, well whoop-dee-do I am astonished.
If thats the case and especially if its a tory lead government then this time we NEED the Lib Dems or whichever smaller parties hold the balance of power to VETO attacks on the BBC and this strategy of intentional strategic undermining of it.
The Greens now seem to have more support than the Lib Dems. I know people across the political spectrum from extreme left to extreme right. Grass root Lib Dems are FURIOUS at Clegg for getting into bed with the Tories; many say they will not vote for their own party whilst Clegg is in charge
Carl & Popeye13, you're absolutely right, great posts! Both the BBC & NHS are national institutions and need saving. This "government" must not be voted back in!
Don't get me wrong, the BBC is not perfect, it still has faults, and there are still questions over its management structure and what it commissions for BBC one in particular. But there is only so much fat that can be cut before you need to eat into muscle or damage vital services that may prove fatal in the long term.
Hahah you think Ed Dumb and Ed Dumber will have the money or the brains to deal with either problem?
The BBC still gets £3.5 billion a year. The government froze funding across the board in 2010, why should the BBC have been any different?
Does the Beeb take donations? A quick whip round amongst some of the posters on this thread would no doubt be much appreciated by the poor dears at Broadcasting House.
Secondly, well, there doesn't need to be a second point because the first was so good.
I think its a bit cynical to think that the only reason he supports the BBC is because he has worked for them. Do you not have some more constructive argument about why you would disagree with what he said rather than pointing out that you don't think his view is surprising.
Its different because other cuts were made to reduce government spending and the deficit. The licence fee has nothing to do with that.
Really hatred? Is that why the NHS was one of the only ring fenced areas in the spending review? In terms of the BBC why shouldn't it face reasonable cut backs when other more necessary public services did as well?
Gotta love these people who think if Labour win we will suddenly all be happy and joyful, all war will end, everyone will suddenly have a fantastic quality of life and all the country will smell of roses.
Labour, Tories, Lib Dems all the same nothing will change when will people realise this instead of drooling towards May thinking how wonderful it's going to be.
Labour will have no more money to spend than Conservatives therefore the BBC is not going to suddenly be handed a huge cheque from Ed Miliband.
Here's Popeye13 talking as if Ed Miliband is Superman coming to save us all.
I think RTD is right. Cameron is determined to bring the BBC to its knees.
For him I think it's personal and vindictive; dating way back to the days he worked for Carlton (and look what a dreadful company that was).
If people want wall to wall American programming and huge subscription charges, (Murdoch'), then look no further than the next Tory goverment.
They have laid the groundwork these last 5 years. Now the axe can fall on the BBC and on the NHS and on many other things.
It's a puzzle why anyone other than the super-rich ever vote for the Conservative party these days. That does not mean anyone should vote Labour of course!
But why vote for a Conservative party that increasingly serves only big business and the super rich?
I didn't specifically say Labour but a hung Parliament with labour as the largest party and having to rely on smaller parties whether that is Lib Dems, Greens or SNP but not UKIP then that would be good.
Good point about C4
Well two Eds are better than one.
I'll get my coat...
The government didn't give the public a choice about the BBC and its not funded though general taxation like all other public services are, the LF fee could have rose in line with inflation and so could the BBC budget quite separate to any other public service! A rise in line with inflation wouldn't have hurt
Anyone.
I highly agree with you