Options

The Big Society

[Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 10,848
Forum Member
✭✭
Or BS as it's otherwise known. Where will all the volunteers come from, or will it be like National Service for any benefit claimants?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/johnhess/2010/10/finding_a_new_army_of.html

The poster in the background looks like its aimed at a five year old, really awful.
«134

Comments

  • Options
    Pink_PounderPink_Pounder Posts: 13,168
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    It was a really poor 'hook' for an election campaign, I thought. It failed miserably. Those who would point out that the Conservatives won the election can include me in those who will point out that they didn't. They form a government of coalition but anything other than a decisive clear majority victory was unthinkable shortly before the campaign started.

    The idea doesn't hold much weight among the Tory grass-roots either. It's kind of a flat concept that Cameron would do better to go back to the drawing board with.

    Aside from the speech that made even the party faithful yawn and look at their watches in Birmingham and Baroness Warsi speaking of a clean car park in her constituency, I'm not sure many people know what it means. Worse or Cameron, I don't think many more people care.
  • Options
    TelevisionUserTelevisionUser Posts: 41,417
    Forum Member
    It was a really poor 'hook' for an election campaign, I thought. It failed miserably. Those who would point out that the Conservatives won the election can include me in those who will point out that they didn't. They form a government of coalition but anything other than a decisive clear majority victory was unthinkable shortly before the campaign started.

    The idea doesn't hold much weight among the Tory grass-roots either. It's kind of a flat concept that Cameron would do better to go back to the drawing board with.

    Aside from the speech that made even the party faithful yawn and look at their watches in Birmingham and Baroness Warsi speaking of a clean car park in her constituency, I'm not sure many people know what it means. Worse or Cameron, I don't think many more people care.

    Big Society = get the unpaid sucker citizens to do what really should be done by central government, local government and social services.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 10,848
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Pink_Pounder - No they certainly didn't win the election, the hung parliament is known to be a vote of no confidence in any of the parties to take control (because there is no societal will to give any individual party a majority).

    I agree, he really is flogging a dead horse but he seems to be carrying on with the idea though, mentioning it at the conference. Even his wife, Samantha, said it was something he was really passionate about.

    Will he force a pet project of his own through even though he doesn't have his party's support, nor the support of the voters for the whole notion of BS.
  • Options
    tysonstormtysonstorm Posts: 24,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Big Society is Socialism-Lite.

    You'd of thought the Left would of lapped up any form of Socialism.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,799
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Maybe it's National Socialism-Lite.

    I read in the Coast Artillery Journal Sep-Oct 1938 (pdf) (published bi-monthly under the supervision of the United States Coast Artillery Association for the information of the Coast Artillery personnel of the Regular Army, National Guard and Organized Reserves: $4 per year, single copies 75¢) that:

    "The National Socialist Welfare Society is "one of the best and most important institutions of new Germany. Membership in this organization, as of all the others of the Party, is voluntary." The Society controls the Winter Relief Fund, through which, in 1936, 1,200,000 honorary helpers assisted 13,000,000 people from cold and hunger."

    Excellent.
  • Options
    Tulip19Tulip19 Posts: 3,076
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I must confess I don't really understand what he means by the term.
  • Options
    LyricalisLyricalis Posts: 57,958
    Forum Member
    I think the idea of communities doing things from themselves rather than waiting for someone else to do it, which is often a long wait, is a good one. It only works though if people have the spare time to participate. Unless Cameron sees The Big Society being manned by pensioners and the unemployed then I don't see how it can work until the work-live balance in this country changes. That didn't really happen before the recession, so I can't see it happening now.
  • Options
    cpu121cpu121 Posts: 5,330
    Forum Member
    Tulip19 wrote: »
    I must confess I don't really understand what he means by the term.
    Try this:

    "But more than this, we need people, families, communities, businesses to step up to the plate and understand that it’s not just about stopping the bad things…

    …it’s about actively doing the good things.

    Not waiting for the state to do it all, but taking responsibility, making a difference, saying loudly and proudly: this is my country, this is my community: I will play my part.

    That is social responsibility.

    That is our idea."
  • Options
    David SteinbergDavid Steinberg Posts: 1,221
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    trickyvik wrote: »
    Or BS as it's otherwise known. Where will all the volunteers come from, or will it be like National Service for any benefit claimants?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/johnhess/2010/10/finding_a_new_army_of.html

    The poster in the background looks like its aimed at a five year old, really awful.

    I thought you had to be 18 to vote?

    Must have lowered the age to 5 before the last election.
  • Options
    J LeninJ Lenin Posts: 3,228
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    cpu121 wrote: »
    Try this:

    "But more than this, we need people, families, communities, businesses to step up to the plate and understand that it’s not just about stopping the bad things…

    …it’s about actively doing the good things.

    Not waiting for the state to do it all, but taking responsibility, making a difference, saying loudly and proudly: this is my country, this is my community: I will play my part.

    That is social responsibility.

    That is our idea."

    Yes it is all very vague. What is it that people are going to be expected to do that the state previously did? I suspect that this idea will eventually be buried. Cameron gave it another blast at the party conference to embarassing silence. Time to drop it. Hope he doesn't though because it makes him look rather stupid.
  • Options
    Phil 2804Phil 2804 Posts: 21,846
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    tysonstorm wrote: »
    Big Society is Socialism-Lite.

    You'd of thought the Left would of lapped up any form of Socialism.

    It isn't socialism-lite. Its getting taxpayers to do voluntarily the kinds of things their taxes should pay for the Government to do.
  • Options
    J LeninJ Lenin Posts: 3,228
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    tysonstorm wrote: »
    Big Society is Socialism-Lite.

    You'd of thought the Left would of lapped up any form of Socialism.

    Are you suggesting that Cameron wants to develop socialist ideas? Must watch out for that in the next Tory manifesto.
  • Options
    AiramAiram Posts: 6,764
    Forum Member
    clearing car parks? easy peasy.

    Clearing out canals and rivers polluted for years with all kinds of detritus...............horrid, filthy, cold, wet, sometimes dangerous...and fun getting together to do it. It's been going on for years and years.

    So if that's the Big Society, Dave should get out and see how well it's been going for a generation or two. It's certainly not a new idea or attributable to any organised group, far less one particular political party.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 13,672
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I think I know what he means and I quite like the idea - the problem is that you can't force this sort of society-mindedness from the top - you have to create the right conditions and hope that the sense of community grows on its own and in its own time.

    Telling society to do something (anything) usually results in - NO!
  • Options
    Phil 2804Phil 2804 Posts: 21,846
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Airam wrote: »
    clearing car parks? easy peasy.

    Clearing out canals and rivers polluted for years with all kinds of detritus...............horrid, filthy, cold, wet, sometimes dangerous...and fun getting together to do it. It's been going on for years and years.

    So if that's the Big Society, Dave should get out and see how well it's been going for a generation or two. It's certainly not a new idea or attributable to any organised group, far less one particular political party.

    Indeed there are always loads of volunteers who get to together to maintain scrub land near where my parents live.

    In the local dog walking park, when the paths get overgrown with bushes my dad will take his sheers out with them and prune them all back.

    People have been doing these things for years Dave. Lets not forget it was your favourite leader who proclaimed there was no such thing as society. So make your bloody minds up.
  • Options
    Tulip19Tulip19 Posts: 3,076
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    cpu121 wrote: »
    Try this:

    "But more than this, we need people, families, communities, businesses to step up to the plate and understand that it’s not just about stopping the bad things…

    …it’s about actively doing the good things.

    Not waiting for the state to do it all, but taking responsibility, making a difference, saying loudly and proudly: this is my country, this is my community: I will play my part.

    That is social responsibility.

    That is our idea."

    Thank you for that.

    It's a bit vague, isn't it?
  • Options
    MesostimMesostim Posts: 52,864
    Forum Member
    Tulip19 wrote: »
    I must confess I don't really understand what he means by the term.

    Neither does Tysonstorm.
  • Options
    AnnsyreAnnsyre Posts: 109,504
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    trickyvik wrote: »
    Or BS as it's otherwise known. Where will all the volunteers come from, or will it be like National Service for any benefit claimants?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/johnhess/2010/10/finding_a_new_army_of.html

    The poster in the background looks like its aimed at a five year old, really awful.

    Dreadful isn't it, when I did voluntary conservation work I used to drag my children away from the tv and force them out into the fresh air into woodland. I should have been arrested.:rolleyes:
  • Options
    MandarkMandark Posts: 47,964
    Forum Member
    J Lenin wrote: »
    Yes it is all very vague. What is it that people are going to be expected to do that the state previously did? I suspect that this idea will eventually be buried. Cameron gave it another blast at the party conference to embarassing silence. Time to drop it. Hope he doesn't though because it makes him look rather stupid.
    Problem for Cameron though is that if he drops the idea then he'll be admitting that there will be no-one to pick up the services that local councils will soon be dumping. And dumping them we will be.

    It then depends on the people. If they're happy with that then fine, Cameron gets another term. If they're not, the Coalition will be out next election.
  • Options
    VennegoorVennegoor Posts: 14,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Phil 2804 wrote: »
    Indeed there are always loads of volunteers who get to together to maintain scrub land near where my parents live.

    In the local dog walking park, when the paths get overgrown with bushes my dad will take his sheers out with them and prune them all back.

    People have been doing these things for years Dave. Lets not forget it was your favourite leader who proclaimed there was no such thing as society. So make your bloody minds up.

    The messge has morphed into: we don't want to pay for society, it's expensive when rich people need tax breaks.
  • Options
    wavejockglwwavejockglw Posts: 10,596
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I don't think anyone actually understands what the 'Big Society' idea is.

    I bet Cameron and the Tories own spin doctors don't quite get it but it has a nice classless ring as a strapline and politics is all about percieved values ain't it?
  • Options
    tysonstormtysonstorm Posts: 24,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    J Lenin wrote: »
    Are you suggesting that Cameron wants to develop socialist ideas? Must watch out for that in the next Tory manifesto.

    Cheap/free labour under the guise of Big Society (Socialism-lite) then yes I am saying that.
  • Options
    tysonstormtysonstorm Posts: 24,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Mesostim wrote: »
    Neither does Tysonstorm.

    I do as it happens. Thats why I am against this Big Society idea. It stinks to high heaven of Socialism.
  • Options
    AnnsyreAnnsyre Posts: 109,504
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    tysonstorm wrote: »
    Cheap/free labour under the guise of Big Society (Socialism-lite) then yes I am saying that.

    Then you are wrong. I did not do voluntary work to save the taxpayer money, I did it because I enjoyed it and took pride in doing something for the community that I lived in. And so did all the others whom I met over the years.

    I took my children with me sometimes so that they could meet like minded people and grow up with a sense of civic duty.
  • Options
    tysonstormtysonstorm Posts: 24,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Phil 2804 wrote: »
    It isn't socialism-lite. Its getting taxpayers to do voluntarily the kinds of things their taxes should pay for the Government to do.

    Much like Socialism. Making people do more than their fair share when other sit back on their arses. Ticks all the boxes for Socialism. Which is why I'm surprised the Left are against it. Would they be against this Big Society Small Socialism if it had been a Labour idea?
Sign In or Register to comment.