No I don't. His is an outrageous housemate but has done nothing to warrant being removed from the house as some people are suggesting, in my view.
Ken was an outrageous HM too.
All im saying is BB needs to be fair to all HM's, Perez has offended viewers, just like Ken did, but the difference is with Ken it was only words, with Perez it's been actions as well.
Just because he's flamboyant doesn't give him a free pass.
Comments or offensive actions are valid reasons for removal...pretending to have sex with a window isn't really everyones cup of tea.
Perez has already been warned for comments he made, he also suggested a young straight woman simulated lesbian sex for airtime, that offended the woman involved...the guy is just as bad if not worse than Ken.
He is much worse, it may not be illegal as sex in the house may not be illegal,difference is we dont really see or hear HMs when they have sex in the house most of the time it is a guessing game, he was so explicit in what he was doing IMO it was offensive, surprised they showed it to be honest.
Exactly, why don't these people just stay away from the show ? it's clearly not for them
Sega I share your One possibility is that these "reluctant" viewers actually get a vicarious thrill, expressed through taking offensive. Like the Me Me Me CBB housemates we watch, they are able to make it about them by being disgusted.
Otherwise they would simply decide "Not For Me" and watch something else.
All im saying is BB needs to be fair to all HM's, Perez has offended viewers, just like Ken did, but the difference is with Ken it was only words, with Perez it's been actions as well.
Just because he's flamboyant doesn't give him a free pass.
I see you enjoy being deliberately obtuse
Myself and others on this thread have told you that Ken broke the rules numerous times, Perez has not. Therefore Ken got the boot. Perez hasn't.
It's as simple as that. Stop peddling this idea that Perez is being given a free pass.
Obviously he shouldn't be removed, but the point im making is others have been removed for less than he has done so far....im saying either everyone should be removed who causes any offense to anyone (which is daft) or BB should let all the HM's say and (within reason) do what they want.
Who has been removed for less. Ken had to go for the language he used, for which he was first given a warning, and sexist behaviour, and Jeremy for obvious reasons.
He is much worse, it may not be illegal as sex in the house may not be illegal,difference is we dont really see or hear HMs when they have sex in the house most of the time it is a guessing game, he was so explicit in what he was doing IMO it was offensive, surprised they showed it to be honest.
And he explained to anyone who would listen just how much he enjoyed himself.
Can you imagine the outrage on here from those who support Perez if Ken did the same thing.? ;-)
He is much worse, it may not be illegal as sex in the house may not be illegal,difference is we dont really see or hear HMs when they have sex in the house most of the time it is a guessing game, he was so explicit in what he was doing IMO it was offensive, surprised they showed it to be honest.
Well I don' think Kim and Steven could have been much more blatant could they?
Who has been removed for less. Ken had to go for the language he used, for which he was first given a warning, and sexist behaviour, and Jeremy for obvious reasons.
Was he exposed? I must have been laughing too hard to see.
*goes to re-watch the tape*
My comments tend to be jokey. But I'm sure if someone went into the streets with nothing but their underwear there would be a bit of an uproar rofl. Exposure or not
I'm surprised that it was broadcast though because rather than being entertained, I was mildly offended.
I found it HUGELY offensive - not because of the sex act per se but because he was deliberately provoking the HMs and as usual trying to get as much attention as possible.
I think he's the most offensive human being ever to be on BB!
By behaving like a 10 year old he's deflecting our attention from his massively offensive blogs. I have nothing good to say about this little creep. End of.
He is much worse, it may not be illegal as sex in the house may not be illegal,difference is we dont really see or hear HMs when they have sex in the house most of the time it is a guessing game, he was so explicit in what he was doing IMO it was offensive, surprised they showed it to be honest.
It was a must to screen. I'm surprised that people who choose to watch CBB are offended by an idiot faking sex with himself courtesy of a mirrored window.
Warning for those who cannot cope with CBB:
Tonight ITV will screen Bridget Jones's Diary complete with this scene:
"And, um...
"these are, uh...
F--- me, absolutely enormous panties.
Jesus. F----.
No, no, don't apologize. I like them.
Hello, Mummy."
But other channels, or even a good book, are available.
Ken had to be removed for the language he chose to use. Mrs Checks has explain very well earlier in the thread why it was appropriate for Ken to be removed. There is no comparison between the two. End of.
It was a must to screen. I'm surprised that people who choose to watch CBB are offended by an idiot faking sex with himself courtesy of a mirrored window.
This Marg, is what baffles me. When did the BB viewer get so stuffy. What do they think they are watching? It has never been afternoon tea and jolly hockey sticks (well expect BB4 )
My comments tend to be jokey. But I'm sure if someone went into the streets with nothing but their underwear there would be a bit of an uproar rofl. Exposure or not
Comments
Ken was an outrageous HM too.
All im saying is BB needs to be fair to all HM's, Perez has offended viewers, just like Ken did, but the difference is with Ken it was only words, with Perez it's been actions as well.
Just because he's flamboyant doesn't give him a free pass.
Sega I share your
Otherwise they would simply decide "Not For Me" and watch something else.
Well I wouldn't have found it funny - I'd have found it very weird (as it was) but out of character for her.
I certainly wouldn't be crying out for her to be removed from the house though.
I see you enjoy being deliberately obtuse
Myself and others on this thread have told you that Ken broke the rules numerous times, Perez has not. Therefore Ken got the boot. Perez hasn't.
It's as simple as that. Stop peddling this idea that Perez is being given a free pass.
Who has been removed for less. Ken had to go for the language he used, for which he was first given a warning, and sexist behaviour, and Jeremy for obvious reasons.
And he explained to anyone who would listen just how much he enjoyed himself.
Can you imagine the outrage on here from those who support Perez if Ken did the same thing.?
Well I don' think Kim and Steven could have been much more blatant could they?
Ken deserved warnings, not removal.
Was he exposed? I must have been laughing too hard to see.
*goes to re-watch the tape*
You beat me to it....... !
They weren't doing it for attention or to shock people either, if they did it in the garden in front of all the HM's then you would have a point.
If you read the post I was responding to I think you'll find I do have a point.;-)
Him doing it was funny, (to you). Her doing it wouldn't be. OK.
No further questions.
I found it HUGELY offensive - not because of the sex act per se but because he was deliberately provoking the HMs and as usual trying to get as much attention as possible.
I think he's the most offensive human being ever to be on BB!
By behaving like a 10 year old he's deflecting our attention from his massively offensive blogs. I have nothing good to say about this little creep. End of.
It was a must to screen. I'm surprised that people who choose to watch CBB are offended by an idiot faking sex with himself courtesy of a mirrored window.
Warning for those who cannot cope with CBB:
Tonight ITV will screen Bridget Jones's Diary complete with this scene:
"And, um...
"these are, uh...
F--- me, absolutely enormous panties.
Jesus. F----.
No, no, don't apologize. I like them.
Hello, Mummy."
But other channels, or even a good book, are available.
Ken had to be removed for the language he chose to use. Mrs Checks has explain very well earlier in the thread why it was appropriate for Ken to be removed. There is no comparison between the two. End of.
Glad to oblige.
Do you not think it would be weird and out of character for her to do it? Two people can do the same thing - it doesn't mean that they're both funny.
Your still wrong, whoever you were responding to.
It's you're
This Marg, is what baffles me. When did the BB viewer get so stuffy. What do they think they are watching? It has never been afternoon tea and jolly hockey sticks (well expect BB4
In the street maybe, but not a back garden, and Perez exposed less than some. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/tv-radio/pictures-celebrity-big-brother-bikini-4948586
I think there must have been an element of wanting attention, otherwise they could have waited a couple of weeks?