Chelsea Handler on Angelina Jolie ....
cashloot147
Posts: 609 Forum Member
✭✭
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/news/a291722/handler-slams-homewrecker-angelina-jolie.html
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/news/a292621/chelsea-handler-continues-jolie-tirade.html
As someone who has never liked Angelina Jolie, I am loving Chelsea Handler right now!!!
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/news/a292621/chelsea-handler-continues-jolie-tirade.html
As someone who has never liked Angelina Jolie, I am loving Chelsea Handler right now!!!
0
Comments
Really? Well, you're loving someone who's described Jolie's kids as (1) a monkey (Zahara), and (2) a lesbian (Shiloh.) Sadly, the attention she's looking for is not forthcoming from the person she apparently thinks is lower than low... but oddly can't shut up about at the same time.
Jennifer Aniston, if she'd an ounce of dignity, would distance herself from this idiot as, rightly or wrongly, she is being seen as Aniston's bitter mouthpiece.
Chelsea Handler is vile. She's a vile human being for bringing Angelina's kids into her tirade and for calling someone a ****. I wonder if she has the balls to say it Angelina's face...And as for the whole Brad and Jen thing, she only knows one side of what happened between Jen and Brad and as far as I'm concerned NO ONE can be stolen from another person. There was clearly something wrong in Aniston and Pitt's marriage in order for him to look elsewhere. People can blame Angelina all they want but Jen clearly wasn't doing something right in that marriage if he went elsewhere.
And how is it possible that Angelina and Jen get the worst rep from this ridiculous situation but no says anything bad about
Brad??
Rather selective reasoning there!
Out of curiousity, why though? Jolie's not done anything that warrants being called a c*&t, has she? I'm hoping you're not going to go down the 'stolen husband' route...
It didn't help when John Mayor said she was boring in bed.:o
He is a d*k anyway.
It doesn't look good for Jennifer being good friends with Chelsea.
She could be totally innocent in all this.
Erm......it was "claimed" (as in "sources close to") that Jennifer said this about him, never once that he said it about her. Google it.
I cant open the link for some reason but if as another poster notes that she called Zahara a monkey then I'd suggest that was a tad racist. As for not having female friends Mariane Pearl spoke about how Angelina has become one of her closest friends and is one of the most loyal, supportive people ever.
On another note why does Chelsea always come across as a demented drunk on her programmes? I hate people who laugh at their own "jokes".
And no one ever says anything bad about Brad, he apparently is a spinless moron who cant think for himself, led away from a wife he loved and was happy with by an evil woman.:rolleyes:
She is known to be a very heavy drinker. And looks it.
Edit: The name-calling is not mentioned at the above links, it was at one of her earlier gigs. Nasty stuff.
I doubt very much that Jen had anything to do with Chelsea running her mouth. I actually feel a tad bit sorry for Jen, people are most likely going to think she put Chelsea up to it when, from what I've gathered, she just wants her name to not be associated with Angelina and Brad.
That was what I was thinking!
It is always easy to laugh at something horrible said about someone you hate I wonder if people would find her so funny if she was that nasty about someone they liked.
If Chelsea is such good friends with Jen then you would think she would not say something about Angelina as people are bound to think Chelsea had asked Jen if she minded her having a go at her!I am not saying that is the case but if not who needs friends like Chelsea if you have moved on!
That's a cheap and rather obvious insult to hurl at someone when you have a problem with them. It says more than John than anything.
This sort of humour seems to be quite popular in America, with those "Roast" things they do, but it's not for me. Just comes across as unnecessarily nasty even if it is an "act". I find it too uncomfortable viewing so I avoid like these sort of things like the plague.
Sorry, don't have one, read about it a while back and it was referred to in the comments on various threads about Handler on celebitchy. She also made very ignorant comments about Maddox (Eskimo boy etc). Anyone who is reduced to getting personal about a celeb's kids in order to fuel their vendettas against them is pathetic, at best.
Chelsea speaks the truth. I don't believe Angelina's humanitarian efforts and adoptions are a result of her selfless need to give to others. I believe Angelina exploits refugees and orphans for her own personal gain. If she was a selfless person, she wouldn't build her happiness on the misery of others. But this is a woman who has repeatedly had affairs with married/engaged men without a care in the world for the wife/fiance. She is a poor excuse for a woman, imo. She's somebody I don't want my daughter to look up to.
I'm damned if I see what's funny/clever/admirable/brave about it.
^^ the quote on Maddox...I don't know about the other children but she did make a remark about their 9 year old son Maddox which I heard about...A grown woman making not so nice remarks about a child who is only 9, very immature and low of Chelsea...
As for the story, Chelsea just needs to move on, the ink on the divorce papers dried over FIVE years ago!!...Both Brad and Angie have a young family now, if they are happy and content with each other then so be it...She doesn't need PR for her humanitarian efforts her star status alone helps bring attention/coverage to issues that wouldn't get a second glance from anyone, in other words they need her more than she needs them...xx
I think that is the real point that it was five years ago:eek:I guess some people just like to keep bringing it up because they hate her.Joanne Woodward and Paul Newman had an affair while he was still married it is not nice but it happens.Though I guess if it was now people like Chelsea would slag her off,the man is blameless of course!
It also makes me laugh when people say she is just after good PR for her humanitarian efforts I think there are easier ways to get good PR than go to countries like Pakistan and Iraq like she does.I would not want to go there.
I guess she can't win and whatever she does is for some twisted reason according to some peole sat behind a keyboard:eek:
This so much.
If she's going to these third world countries or countries hit by natural disasters for personal gain does that mean people like George Clooney and Matt Damon, who are campaigning to raise awareness of what is happening in Darfur, are also doing it for their own personal gain too. What about Christina Aguilera who campaigns for domestic violence? Leonardo DiCaripo on global warming? Hayden Panettiere on the whole whale thing? Even Brad Pitt who is doing all that work in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. If we're seriously going to question ONE Hollywood star about their humanitarian efforts, then question EVERY single Hollywood stars reason for trying to raise awareness for something they are passionate about.
If she was truly doing it for personal gain I doubt very much that she would give the tens of thousands sometimes even millions of dollars to charity.
The general consensus I've gathered is that it's not that Chelsea called Angelina names, it's the fact that she got Angelina's kids involved. I wonder how Chelsea would feel if someone took the piss out of her kids. I guess she won't understand until she has kids herself.
Obviously calling individual children nasty names is wrong if that is what has happened but I think people need to realise (bearing in mind all the fuss about KP and the Harvey jokes) its the PARENTS the jokes are aimed at, not the kids.
I agree with above. I'm not a 'fan' of either, although if I had to pick, I'd rather get stuck in a lift with Angelina any day.
What I find strange though, is that people who actually KNOW Aniston have been and continue to be so vicious towards Angelina - it makes me wonder why. Most people would have let it drop after all this time and also most people would accept that Brad was the only person who split up his marriage. It makes me wonder if there's something about what happened surrounding the split that we don't know about which makes people feel so vicious towards Angelina.