Since when has a rudimentary depiction of the female genitalia been considered 'porn'?
This is the opinion of most archaeologists. It might be a yonnic (ladyparts) image, or it could be a fruit or flower, or it could even be a piece of symbolism combining all three.
The Aurignacian culture was not the first to "come out of Africa" either. They are talking rubbish there.
CLL Dodge
Posts: 115,766
Comments
Revulva?
pathetic :mad:
YES!!
Hardly w*nk material unless you have a fetish.
This is the opinion of most archaeologists. It might be a yonnic (ladyparts) image, or it could be a fruit or flower, or it could even be a piece of symbolism combining all three.
The Aurignacian culture was not the first to "come out of Africa" either. They are talking rubbish there.
cant see nuffin must be censored lol
To me, it just looks like a rock/stone that's got random shapes on it.
i tried that but the rock isnt doing anything for me
back to new porn for me
well try harder and you'll see ferris wheel. it's worth it.
What ? ... like looking into the distance ( magic- eye-stylie )
Still not getting it ... it's a leaf