Vincent and Flavia
[Deleted User]
Posts: 695
Forum Member
✭✭
Are they really a couple in real life? All I have seen is 'professional partner'. I know it is not important or I shouldn't care but I guess it is always quite sweet to think they are 'really' together. Want to talk about something nice for a change instead of negative things!
0
Comments
They ran a story implying that Matt has a thing for Flavia "who is believed to be single". What????????
Who do the tabs ask to check their facts?
:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
Surely this isn't true?!
Perhaps he's decided to run off with me after all
The following statements are BOTH from Wikipedia . Make your mind up Wikipedia!!
She and her professional dancing partner, Vincent Simone, who is also her partner outside dancing are two-time world champions at the Argentine Tango
She is also supposed to be dating Her current Dance Partner Matt Di Angelo
Naughty Wikipedia - as unreliable and as scurrilous as our beloved tabloids
I remember some friends actually got something on there when they were messing about- I can't remember what exactly they did but it was something to with getting one of their nicknames into an entry about a business phrase It wasn't very amusing but they thought it was!
Anyhoo, thats why I think wiki is a bit pants:D
Believe me the press always know more than the public - whether they print it, even to the extent of deliberately misleading, is another matter!
Totally :cool::)
I've got so much respect and awe for them both, I could NEVER lose it Have NO respect whatsoever for unreliable and ill-sourced gossip
Yay As if we could ever doubt it :cool:
It doesn't say that any longer
Wikipedia does often contain inaccurate 'stubs' added to entries by the registered editors due to its policy of allowing anyone to contribute. What usually happens after someone removed a 'stub' as you have is the registered editor or person making the entry is invited to provide the sources for the information; if verified and you have provided your details you will be asked for your source and it is resolved that way. It only goes back in if reliably sourced. That's the theory, although many editors simply don't have the time to worry about every small alteration and a lot of people make 'corrections' anonymously so preventing checking.