Have nomination rules been randomly changed yet again?
snariek
Posts: 2,052 Forum Member
✭✭✭
So it seems we have switched back to the two nominations and you're up rule, with no explanation whatsoever (not that we've come to expect one).
Or have I missed something?
Or have I missed something?
0
Comments
They are making nominations hard to enjoy because they keep changing the rules. They are treating us like idiots.
I wish someone on BBBOTS would say something about it just to make more people aware, i am sure Emma wouldn't know what to say in response.
Yes. It always used to be the two or more who had the most nominations that were up. Now it seems to be anyone who gets two or more votes is up.
I wish they officialized the rules regarding who faces the vote. If they wish to change the rules, it would be nice if they had a page on the site stating the rules. I also wish that Marcus would state the rules of nominations before the nominations segment of the highlights show is aired.
What used to be the never changing rule?
(I exclude C4 BB obviously)
I have asked to see the house rules but as yet haven't had any luck
it makes it even more obvious that they are making it up as they go along.
and as for this weeks ridiculous twist to get Toya up for eviction... bizarre !! the show is in the hands of apes ladies and gentlement
It started on Channel 5 the same as Channel 4, the two housemates with the most nominations are up for eviction.
Then starting with BB14 it changed to the three housemates with the most nominations are up. Then randomly in week 5 of that series, anyone who got at least two nominations was put up for eviction, with no explanation given.
CBB12 went back to having the three or more housemates with the most nominations go up.
CBB13 went back again to putting anyone with a least two nominations up.
BB15 started with the three or more housemates with the most nominations going up, but have now once again randomly reverted back to putting anyone with a least two nominations up.
Confused? Join the club.
the show will protect the chances of having a big final.
it is dynamic rather than "known" as the voting is fashionable.. but when you see in the bog football competitions a round of "best of 2" (ie home and away) it is to make sure too many flukes doesnt get through and thus kill the spectacle of the final phases!
It's ridiculous. It seems they changed this week to "2 noms and you're up" as otherwise their veto twist would have fallen flat on it's arse by making no difference whatsoever.
It should have been Danielle, Chris and Ash who were up, both before the veto was used and after - they just threw those with 2 noms into the mix so that the veto would take one out.
.
Before the removal of Steven Marlon and Ash's noms...
Chris 7
Danielle 5
Ash 3
Steven 2
Marlon 2
Winston 2
KImberly 2
Ashleigh 1
After the removal of their noms...
Chris 5
Danielle 3
Ash 3
Steven 2
Marlon 2
Winston 2
Kimberley 1
No there have never been hard and fast rules on Channel 5.
Not confused at all. Unpredictability is good for the HMs especially those who act as gangs.
cheers
so the veto scheme changed nothing . And the producers just decided to make everyone with 2 votes up instead .
.
Only 3 HMs were added in week one though.
Also, this week Christopher and one of Toya/Matthew would have been added to Jale - which means there were already 3 people up for eviction before this weeks noms were even taken into account. So there would have been 6 up, even without changing it to add in those on 2 noms.
It's farcical.
That's putting it lightly. It's an absolute joke.
Fair enough maybe on Friday Emma can go the "next person to be evicted is….No one!! We are evicting no one this week." Then she’ll turn to the camera and say "see you next Friday!", without offering any explanation to the viewers whatsoever, and they can just ignore the whole thing on BOTS too. After all that kind of “unpredictability” (i.e. a blatant cop out) is good right?
They can't add a couple of people with 2 and not all if they don't have the 4 they need up each week. It's just not fair to make it a 2 or 3 way with the killer nom.
The answer is more likely in your response to me.. BB put up 3 by machinations, which is separate from the 3 for balance from the HM's. It's not BB fault that there was a 4 way tie on the 3rd of 3. Or was it a 3 way tie on 4.
.
deleted.
Yet we continue to watch.