Options
Debbie Harry slams 'too overtly sexual' Christina
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/v2/0f6cc84a34cd6625d3a68ed20c023c17.svg)
[Deleted User]
Posts: 10,287 Forum Member
✭✭
http://www.lemondrop.co.uk/2010/06/04/debbie-harry-slams-modern-pop-divas-for-being-too-raunchy/?icid=main|uk-ws-bb|dl7|link4|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemondrop.co.uk%2F2010%2F06%2F04%2Fdebbie-harry-slams-modern-pop-divas-for-being-too-raunchy%2F
Ms Harry thinks today's pop divas are too OTT in the sexual department.
Ms Harry thinks today's pop divas are too OTT in the sexual department.
0
Comments
http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/harry-i-was-tame-compared-to-aguilera_1144981
I don't agree, having remember Debbie back in the day she was tame comapred to now and yes she has a point.
I think she is choosing CA as just one example.
Britney isn't so much a first class singer as a first class entertainer, and gives first class value as such. But I kinda get the impression that she'd be just as happy selling burgers from a mobile van, and taking home a big bag of cheese burgers at the end of the day for her family's dinners, as singing in front of an audience or having a number one hit album.
As for Beyonce, she's sold on her looks and her sexy videos, not the music. A (very) poor man's Diana Ross, but with nowhere near the talent or the great songwriters behind her. Pity, she could do so much better if she sang soul or sultry jazz, rather than substandard r'n'b. Not to mention stopping filling out her albums with duets. .
All the above is just my opinion. Copyright is mine.
I hope you disagree with me. The world would be awful if we all thought the same. Have a wonderful weekend!!
Oh, you put it so much better than I did.
And I agree about Britney, she seems like she'd have had a much happier, better life if she was just 'normal'.
Wonder what her (Cyrus') father makes of his daughter's behaviour ? :cool:
Sad but true. Her heart hasn't been in it for a long time. She still seems very fragile to me.
Both 100% more sexual and explicit than anything Christina Aguilera has ever done.
She only done two collaborations on her last album and they weren't even on the standard edition of the album.
From what I've read, everyone else did. Whats one more opinion? Maybe she thinks as Christina actually has a great voice she doesn't need to sell herself as a **** like Madonna, Britney, Beyonce, Rihanna, Gaga etc have to.
You wait till you hear her new album:D:D
Unless the inside cover has pictures of Christina french kissing lesbian skinheads who are tying her up or hitch hiking completely naked on a public road then I doubt its as raunchy as Madonna's sex book.
They fixed the link, the article isn't as bitter as the OP made it sound.
Debby Harry has done some nude photos, though.
Well she doesn't 'SLAM' Christina, just makes some quite valid points about female artists having to out-sex each other.
Take away the lighting, professional styling and you wouldn't look twice at them walking down the street.
They know this and have the same insecurities we all have. But the difference is they have the whole world looking at them so they take their kit off so everyones talking about their bodies and not their faces and in some cases the lack of talent.
In Christina's case she strikes me as very insecure constantly bragging about her sex life and how much she loves herself.
I think she had some serious hang ups about the way she looks.
I thought Debbie and Madonna had some celebrity feud or something back in the day must google that later
This perhaps squealer?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/dailydish/detail?blogid=7&entry_id=20761