I listened to the Harry one this week and I think it was even better than Benedict's. What he said about the poo in the freezer issue, as well as Jay's detailed knowledge of the cocaine industry was hilarious! If only BOTS could be like that...
I listened to the Harry one this week and I think it was even better than Benedict's. What he said about the poo in the freezer issue, as well as Jay's detailed knowledge of the cocaine industry was hilarious! If only BOTS could be like that...
It was a brilliant interview, yes. BBBOTS ain't got nothin' on Big Brother Gossip.
See I want to listen, just for gossip value, but if he does the interview in the same superior, preaching and condescending manner he used to explain things on BB, I wouldn't be able to bear it! Decisions, decisions!
See I want to listen, just for gossip value, but if he does the interview in the same superior, preaching and condescending manner he used to explain things on BB, I wouldn't be able to bear it! Decisions, decisions!
Nah, he does the interview in the same calm, collected, intelligent and thoughtful manner he used to explain things on BB. Give it a try, what's to lose?
I just realised that this has been my most successful thread ever. More than 4.000 views!:D
I almost never look at views, just replies, but I'm glad that people are taking notice. God knows I've bumped it often enough.
[Edit] Just been to look what my 'hi score' is. One thread got 2,662 views and only 47 replies, and another got 2,685 views but only 72 replies. And then there was Jay shat in the freezer!!!!!!!!!!!! (Merged) - 47,672 views, 994 replies. :eek: The annoying thing is that the thread that I started was titled, 'Jay did a sh*t in the freezer?!'. I guess the mods prefer the word 'shat' to a censored 'sh*t'. Either that or they like an abundance of exclamation marks. Go figure. :rolleyes:
The commenter, WhatJoeThinks, said that complaining to Ofcom about the behaviour of a Big Brother contestant is "like asking the police to get somebody sacked from their job for misconduct".
The commenter, WhatJoeThinks, said that complaining to Ofcom about the behaviour of a Big Brother contestant is "like asking the police to get somebody sacked from their job for misconduct".
LOL! Thanks for the heads up. That comment was only a couple of hours ago. Why they chose to mention me by name I've no idea, and the sentence they chose isn't even in context, is it? The full comment can be found here. I suppose they thought it was pithy. My other comment (#102) was far more in-depth.
[Edit] I'm going to look like a shameless self-publicist if I bump this thread now! I'll leave it to others to spread the word. ...About the radio interviews, that is! :rolleyes:
Comments
Thanks for the thread
It was a brilliant interview, yes. BBBOTS ain't got nothin' on Big Brother Gossip.
Nah, he does the interview in the same calm, collected, intelligent and thoughtful manner he used to explain things on BB. Give it a try, what's to lose?
I almost never look at views, just replies, but I'm glad that people are taking notice. God knows I've bumped it often enough.
[Edit] Just been to look what my 'hi score' is. One thread got 2,662 views and only 47 replies, and another got 2,685 views but only 72 replies. And then there was Jay shat in the freezer!!!!!!!!!!!! (Merged) - 47,672 views, 994 replies. :eek: The annoying thing is that the thread that I started was titled, 'Jay did a sh*t in the freezer?!'. I guess the mods prefer the word 'shat' to a censored 'sh*t'. Either that or they like an abundance of exclamation marks. Go figure. :rolleyes:
See you made the guardian.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jul/09/ofcom-big-brother-complaints?newsfeed=true
The commenter, WhatJoeThinks, said that complaining to Ofcom about the behaviour of a Big Brother contestant is "like asking the police to get somebody sacked from their job for misconduct".
LOL! Thanks for the heads up. That comment was only a couple of hours ago. Why they chose to mention me by name I've no idea, and the sentence they chose isn't even in context, is it? The full comment can be found here. I suppose they thought it was pithy. My other comment (#102) was far more in-depth.
[Edit] I'm going to look like a shameless self-publicist if I bump this thread now! I'll leave it to others to spread the word. ...About the radio interviews, that is! :rolleyes: