Options

Fifteen to One starts again next Saturday

1161719212232

Comments

  • Options
    AJonesSCFCAJonesSCFC Posts: 119
    Forum Member
    First time I've watched it today but wasn't overly impressed, as others have said it's too slow, fifteen to one should be about quick fire questions and no gimmicks. Sandi does o.k. but I'm not sure she's a quiz presenter. Somehow it doesn't quite capture the essence of the original for me either, although I was tad young for it first time around.
    There was a question on The Chase a while back - "What is the brightest star in the night sky?" The contestant said, "The dog star." Bradley Walsh said, "No,it's Sirius." Sirius is also known as the dog star. I think that should have been given.

    Reminds me of a celebrity edition of The Weakest Link. Adam Woodyatt was given a question which had Macbeth as the answer but he referred to it as " The Scottish Play", as a lot of actor types do. It was considered an incorrect answer, much to his bemusement! Anne must be hard task master as I remember another time a contestent on the show correctly give an answer to the capital of Switzerland as Bern but pronounced it as 'Barn', perfectly acceptable in the French speaking part of the country, but not allowed by Anne! Could well have be down to her ignorance as much as anything though.
  • Options
    culttvfanculttvfan Posts: 2,800
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I've tried to give this a go but, as a big fan of the original, I find it unwatchable. Like others have said, what made the old series so good was its fast pace, chit chat free format, neither of which have survived. The Chase seems lightning fast in comparison.
  • Options
    RadiomaniacRadiomaniac Posts: 43,510
    Forum Member
    Sandi Toksvig is just not right for this show.
  • Options
    elfcurryelfcurry Posts: 3,232
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    culttvfan wrote: »
    I've tried to give this a go but, as a big fan of the original, I find it unwatchable. Like others have said, what made the old series so good was its fast pace, chit chat free format, neither of which have survived. The Chase seems lightning fast in comparison.
    I was pretty sure it was going to be dire and since all the comments here have confirmed this is Fifteen-To-One in name only, I won't be wasting time watching it. There's loads of crappy, dumbed down quizs+chatter shows to choose from and I rarely bother. This should have been good but they couldn't let the opportunity to meddle with the format pass them by.

    Still, I'd be interested to hear whether it's getting enough viewers to be considered a 'successful revival' by the show's producers, or it's not doing well enough, people are complaining about the revamp not living up to expectations, and a re-think and getting back to basics is in progress. I can hope.
  • Options
    davadsdavads Posts: 8,644
    Forum Member
    AJonesSCFC wrote: »
    I remember another time a contestent on the show correctly give an answer to the capital of Switzerland as Bern but pronounced it as 'Barn', perfectly acceptable in the French speaking part of the country...

    :confused: I'd have thought the French pronunciation is "Berne" with a French accent. Certainly nowhere near "Barn".
  • Options
    JeffG1JeffG1 Posts: 15,278
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I went to Las Vegas once and got talking to a blackjack dealer while I was playing. He knew I was Scottish,and it turned out he liked malt whisky. "I like Ardbeg",he said. "Oh yes?" "Yes,from the island of Islay",he said proudly,displaying his knowledge of whisky. Except he pronounced it as it is written - "Izzlay." I had to put him right and tell him it was pronounced "Aisle-uh". Poor guy,he had never actually heard it pronounced properly.
    So don't be too hard on the Hailey's Cometters.

    A bit like the 'Aix' in Aix-la-Chapelle, Aix-les-Bains and Aix-en-Provence which is pronounced 'Ex'. I got severely told off on a French train once by the only other passenger in my compartment for repeatedly mispronouncing Aix-les-Bains (a station on our route) as 'Eh' :)

    Once learned, never forgotten! (Another one often mispronounced is the drink Noilly Prat - the t is not silent ;))
  • Options
    SarahsaurusSarahsaurus Posts: 3,670
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    JeffG1 wrote: »
    A bit like the 'Aix' in Aix-la-Chapelle, Aix-les-Bains and Aix-en-Provence which is pronounced 'Ex'. I got severely told off on a French train once by the only other passenger in my compartment for repeatedly mispronouncing Aix-les-Bains (a station on our route) as 'Eh' :))

    That's news to me,I never knew it was pronounced like that.

    Other Scottish place names that trip some people up :

    Kirkcudbright: Kir-KOO-bree
    Kirkcaldy: Kir-KODDY
    Milngavie: Mil-GUY
    Mauchline: Moch-linn (The first bit sounds like loch)

    I've even heard some of these pronounced wrong on the BBC. Good grief,what do we pay our licence for etc,etc..
  • Options
    SarahsaurusSarahsaurus Posts: 3,670
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Then there's St Louis,in Missouri. It's pronounced St Lewis,but I've heard people on the telly say it the French way,like Louis Pasteur.

    My all time favourite pronunciaton blunder was a quizmaster at a not very good pub quiz I went to years ago. It was one of those ones where the quizmaster doesn't set the quiz himself,he just reads out questions that get sent out. He asked a question about the River Thames - and pronounced it as it is written- rhyming with James,with a 'th' sound at the beginning. And this was the quizmaster. How he had managed to go through at least ten years of school and the rest of his adult life without knowing that it was pronounced Temms is beyond me. He also pronounced the Batttle of Culloden,probably the most famous battle fought in Scotland,as CulloDEN. And he was Scottish as well.

    Like I say,it was not a very good quiz. It didn't last long.
  • Options
    SarahsaurusSarahsaurus Posts: 3,670
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    One thing they seem to have changed this series is that if you nominate somebody and they get the question wrong,you can nominate them again. I don't think that was allowed in the original series (except in the final three). It seems a foolish thing to do anyway because if you nominate somebody,they get the question wrong,you nominate them again,but this time they get it right,you can just about guarantee you'll get nominated back. The best thing you can do in the nominate round is try not to provoke people and sneak into the final quietly. Once you get into a nomination battle with somebody,you might survive it,but the chances are you'll be so badly wounded that somebody else will pick you off.
  • Options
    LordBobbinLordBobbin Posts: 359
    Forum Member
    One thing they seem to have changed this series is that if you nominate somebody and they get the question wrong,you can nominate them again. I don't think that was allowed in the original series (except in the final three). It seems a foolish thing to do anyway because if you nominate somebody,they get the question wrong,you nominate them again,but this time they get it right,you can just about guarantee you'll get nominated back. The best thing you can do in the nominate round is try not to provoke people and sneak into the final quietly. Once you get into a nomination battle with somebody,you might survive it,but the chances are you'll be so badly wounded that somebody else will pick you off.


    Was that not allowed in the original? If not, then I think that's actually an improvement to the format - at least from the point of view of the viewer. Obviously it's got to be used sparingly, as it is easy to get into a flame war, as you point out. However, a tactical second-swipe at a contestant makes a lot of sense if they appear to be wilting under the pressure. Hit them and hit them hard!

    I like the tactical variations allowed by the format, and the option of a double-hit opens up the possibilities, and makes for some intriguing duels between contestants. Nobody's forcing you to use that tactic, but under certain circumstances it would be very effective at ridding you of a rival who's going through a wobbly patch.
  • Options
    LordBobbinLordBobbin Posts: 359
    Forum Member
    Not that I'm looking to kick off another Saurus-Scrap on tactics!!! :D:D
  • Options
    JeffG1JeffG1 Posts: 15,278
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    One thing they seem to have changed this series is that if you nominate somebody and they get the question wrong,you can nominate them again. I don't think that was allowed in the original series (except in the final three).
    LordBobbin wrote: »
    Was that not allowed in the original? If not, then I think that's actually an improvement to the format - at least from the point of view of the viewer.


    My post #342:
    JeffG1 wrote: »
    I was surprised when someone was nominated twice in succession in round 2 today. In the original show, we were told beforehand specifically not to do that, but to choose someone else if the first person got their answer wrong.
    ... and definitely not to nominate someone straight back. I don't think it was cast in stone in the rules - just in those days the impression was given that you were expected to play the game like a gentleman (or lady) ! :)
  • Options
    LordBobbinLordBobbin Posts: 359
    Forum Member
    Play like a gentleman?? Pah to that! :p


    I'd certainly frown on blatant cheating, but taking advantage of a player's apparent weakness is fair enough as far as I'm concerned!

    Play as hard as you can, but when it's over, be gracious in defeat (or victory!)

    (It's not as though they're losing limbs out there...)
  • Options
    JeffG1JeffG1 Posts: 15,278
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    LordBobbin wrote: »
    taking advantage of a player's apparent weakness is fair enough as far as I'm concerned!

    That's just not cricket, old boy! :o
  • Options
    CaltonfanCaltonfan Posts: 6,311
    Forum Member
    Does Sandi have an input to the questions picked as every day there seems to be a Danish based question
  • Options
    LordBobbinLordBobbin Posts: 359
    Forum Member
    Caltonfan wrote: »
    Does Sandi have an input to the questions picked as every day there seems to be a Danish based question


    We're all Sandinavians now...
  • Options
    SarahsaurusSarahsaurus Posts: 3,670
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It seems to me the nominate round is open to player "team tactics". Do the players meet beforehand? Let's say there's an ex-Mastermind champion,a Fifteen To One champion,two or three seriously good quizzers,professional standard,if you like,if there was such a thing as a professional quizzer (which there probably isn't,other than the Eggheads and the chasers on The Chase.)

    The other dozen or so players are amateurs,some good,some not so good.

    If one of the amateurs recognises the 'pros',and informs the others,they could effectively collude and agree between themselves to always nominate one of the three top quizzers,and not each other,until the top three are eliminated (if they are),then they would significantly increase their chance of at least getting to the final,because the top guys would be getting a lot more questions than the others,and they're inevitably going to get some wrong.

    You could argue that this wouldn't be very sporting,though.
  • Options
    Brian ReynoldsBrian Reynolds Posts: 1,198
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Unlike some on here, I think Sandi Toksvig is brilliant as compere. She's articulate, warm and pleasant to the contestants. She's is also very knowledgeable. I think that the small amount or repartee humanises the show. I used to watch the original show but found it a bit cold and clinical. I am amazed how little the show has changed after so many years.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 8
    Forum Member
    Interesting article in today's Daily Mail by William G. Stewart
  • Options
    LordBobbinLordBobbin Posts: 359
    Forum Member
    I would say, going back to the 'nominate twice in a row' thing, I thought that was pretty mean the way the old buzzard was deliberately targeting the young guy. Hitting somebody when their mind seems a little floppy is fair enough. But just hammering somebody again and again for no real reason seems poor show. He was pretty unlucky with two of his answers too.
  • Options
    LordBobbinLordBobbin Posts: 359
    Forum Member
    barbatul wrote: »
    Interesting article in today's Daily Mail by William G. Stewart

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2607251/The-BT-salesman-dreamed-TVs-toughest-quiz-sold-rights-just-200.html


    He's not ashamed to blow his own trumpet, is WGS..
  • Options
    jediknight2k1jediknight2k1 Posts: 6,892
    Forum Member
    I usually switch as the show is dull, Sandy Toksvig doesn't have the charisma to carry the show and her previous quiz show was just as boring.

    If C4 is looking for Deal's replacement then it's not this.

    Five Minutes To Fortune is much better IMO :)
  • Options
    GroundhogalGroundhogal Posts: 9,495
    Forum Member
    barbatul wrote: »
    Interesting article in today's Daily Mail by William G. Stewart
    I usually switch as the show is dull, Sandy Toksvig doesn't have the charisma to carry the show and her previous quiz show was just as boring.

    If C4 is looking for Deal's replacement then it's not this.

    Five Minutes To Fortune is much better IMO :)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2607251/The-BT-salesman-dreamed-TVs-toughest-quiz-sold-rights-just-200.html

    Interesting how he says, the main reason they didn't have any banter was so they could fit it all into the half hour yet that became one of the best, most unique features of the programme.
    Wasn't Sandy the presenter of another, tediously slow channel 4 quiz show last year? I'm wondering if she was still under contract so they decided she was the perfect host purely for that reason alone. Maybe it would be better if it was presented by an actor who was well known for playing a nazi on film or tv. Shame Michael Sheard who played Hitler and Himmler many times, is no longer with us. How about Terence Hardiman from Secret Army, who also played the Demon Headmaster? Clifford Rose who played Ludwig Kessler, would've been ideal in his prime but he's probably a bit old now. Or Anthony Valentine, who played Major Moen in Colditz. :D
  • Options
    stewartuustewartuu Posts: 334
    Forum Member
    I usually switch as the show is dull, Sandy Toksvig doesn't have the charisma to carry the show and her previous quiz show was just as boring.

    If C4 is looking for Deal's replacement then it's not this.

    Five Minutes To Fortune is much better IMO :)

    I really felt that had potential. It's a shame C4 buried it against The Chase and Pointless in the schedules, and then axed it after one series.
  • Options
    AJonesSCFCAJonesSCFC Posts: 119
    Forum Member
    davads wrote: »
    :confused: I'd have thought the French pronunciation is "Berne" with a French accent. Certainly nowhere near "Barn".

    Yes I think you're right actually, it's "Barn" in Swiss German on second thoughts but since it's the local dialect in that part of Switzerland, it should still have probably been allowed.
Sign In or Register to comment.