New Technology Destroying Jobs

JeffersonJefferson Posts: 3,736
Forum Member
✭✭✭
And not just the jobs of the lower classes. It will "hollow out" a lot of middle class jobs as well, with the jobs of such as teachers, lawyers, doctors and accountants already targeted, as well as lower status jobs like lorry driving.

You may recall a Labour politician the other month, Stella Creasy, made the claim that if we didn't have mass immigration those already here would have to increase the number of children they are having, to fill all the job vacancies. She doesn't seem to have heard the times they are a changin'.

Up to fairly recently the middle class have been pretty well insulated from the increase in new technologies but that will very soon not be the case. New internet based companies worth billions are sprouting up, but staffing levels only reach a few dozen.

So, my questions are, are you all aware of this new developmenf - there's not a lot been mentioned in the mainstream media. And any thoughts about it?
«1345

Comments

  • Raquelos.Raquelos. Posts: 7,734
    Forum Member
    So it has always been, so it will always be. It's the flip side of progress. You don't see many scribes around since the invention of printing or farriers since cars replaced horses. It's just what happens. There's no point bemoaning something when you can't stop it. We all just have to try and keep up!
  • s2ks2k Posts: 7,415
    Forum Member
    It's not a new development. The same argument was used back in the 70s/80s when admin workers were told that their work was to now be undertaken using a computer. Some could not cope with the change and gave up, but the posts got refilled by new staff and things carried on as normal. If anything, the advances in technology then allowed firms to expand, become more efficient and create new job opportunities within the organization.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,910
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Raquelos. wrote: »
    So it has always been, so it will always be.

    Yes poor old Victor Meldrew was replaced by a box way back in 1990 :D
  • Raquelos.Raquelos. Posts: 7,734
    Forum Member
    pjw1985 wrote: »
    Yes poor old Victor Meldrew was replaced by a box way back in 1990 :D

    I don't believe it :-D
  • swehsweh Posts: 13,665
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Surely not lawyers!

    I wasn't aware of this new development at all. Why should anyone bother with an education anymore? :cry: The robots are taking our jobs!11!
  • AndrueAndrue Posts: 23,358
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Meh. It's always been that way. It tends to create new jobs in equal numbers though - both in the specific area of advancement and in the ancillary jobs that support it. The only people who suffer are those incapable (usually actually unwilling) to retrain. As long as you are willing to adapt and willing to learn you usually do fine. In fact that's just good practice irregardless of progress.

    Unfortunately some people think that once they leave school (or higher education) that's it and they expect to spend the rest of their lives in the same job or at least the same career.

    Having written that though, one development that concerns me a little is in software development. There are signs that computers are approaching the point where they can program themselves. In a lot of areas it's gone from telling them what to do to just telling them what you want (or almost). Now personally I'm not fussed because I should be retired before that shitstorm hits but there's a wider concern. Given how central computers now are to our civilisation and even our culture the idea that they can program themselves better than we can is disturbing. Look up 'Singularity' on Wikipedia :-/
  • tealadytealady Posts: 26,263
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nothing in the OP to back up the claims.
    Which companies worth billions are only staffed by a few people?
    Lawyers, accountants, teachers. All professions that require judgement, knowledge, experience, discernment. Nothing that can be replaced by AI.
  • starry_runestarry_rune Posts: 9,006
    Forum Member
    Will politicians be replaced by robots?
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,910
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Raquelos. wrote: »
    I don't believe it :-D

    Neither did Mrs Warboys :D
  • Gordie1Gordie1 Posts: 6,993
    Forum Member
    There is actually a realm dander here, i know the technological threat against jobs has been around for years, knitting, weaving, car manufacturing, even making pencils now all automated, not neccesarily a bad thing, but thinking into the future, what else could become automated?, and what will all those people do instread?

    We cant just say, they can programme the machines, because some people will never be able to do that, for example.

    i could reasonably see a scenario in the next 50 years where we have automated cars, that could lead to driverless taxis, deliveries, road sweepers etc, all those jobs could become redundent.

    that in itself is no huge thing, but thats a small part of the picture, when you look across all sectors and imagine no one would drive anything, no checkout staff, no postmen, no meter readers, no parking attendants, no grass cutters, no fruit pickers, the list goes on.

    Im not saying progress is a bad thing but their will be a point when society needs to change, as with more and more jobs being taken care of by machinery, new paying jobs that they can do will need to be created.
  • starry_runestarry_rune Posts: 9,006
    Forum Member
    We will end up communist or doing away with money as so little people will be working so little hours
  • jesayajesaya Posts: 35,597
    Forum Member
    YES! Smash the looms and stocking frames!!!!
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,334
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    As I've said before (I think), you'll still need someone to build and invent those robots. I don't think that robots can do that yet. I know there's assembly robots and printers and stuff, but you need someone behind it to tell it what to build; and those robots are more specialized that they do one thing, anyway.

    At least for the moment. Until my laptop decides to suddenly take up tap dancing or something, I don't think we need to worry.
    Will politicians be replaced by robots?

    ...will be? :p
  • Sunset DaleSunset Dale Posts: 1,732
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Andrue wrote: »
    Having written that though, one development that concerns me a little is in software development. There are signs that computers are approaching the point where they can program themselves. In a lot of areas it's gone from telling them what to do to just telling them what you want (or almost). Now personally I'm not fussed because I should be retired before that shitstorm hits but there's a wider concern. Given how central computers now are to our civilisation and even our culture the idea that they can program themselves better than we can is disturbing. Look up 'Singularity' on Wikipedia :-/

    So what robots program themselves, because i don't know of any? Plenty of software engineers about. You need them about anyway when things inevitably go wrong.
  • justatechjustatech Posts: 976
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    In spite of the increase in technology there are now more people working than ever before. New technology is just a way of doing things differently and remember, all of the new technology needs to be made, and serviced and manned in order to use it. That means more jobs doing more skilled work in many cases.

    I know from experience of working i a factory that every single time a new machine was brought in that would allegedly cause job losses, the reality was that new posts were created. These machines helped to increase production which meant that more people were needed to supply the raw materials and to pack up the finished goods. More inspectors were required for quality and inspection purposes and more delivery drivers were needed to take the goods to where they would be sold.

    Yes, some jobs will be lost, but as production increases more people will be employed to feed that extra production.

    And similarly in the more professional middle class jobs. They will still be working but the nature of their jobs will be to be more service orientated rather than sitting at machines.
  • HarrisonMarksHarrisonMarks Posts: 4,360
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Will politicians be replaced by robots?

    Unlikely, robots are much harder to control.
  • JeffersonJefferson Posts: 3,736
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Raquelos. wrote: »
    So it has always been, so it will always be. It's the flip side of progress. You don't see many scribes around since the invention of printing or farriers since cars replaced horses. It's just what happens. There's no point bemoaning something when you can't stop it. We all just have to try and keep up!

    This is different.

    But I'm not surprised so (relatively) few people have heard the news. The mainstream media have been very quiet about it - for now at least.
  • Jasper92Jasper92 Posts: 1,302
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Someone's gotta design and build them pesky robots.
  • tealadytealady Posts: 26,263
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jefferson wrote: »
    few people have heard the news. The mainstream media have been very quiet about it - for now at least.
    So are you going to enlighten us with a few links to support your claims?
  • JeffersonJefferson Posts: 3,736
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    tealady wrote: »
    So are you going to enlighten us with a few links to support your claims?

    I haven't got any links but one or two others others must have heard about this?
  • Raquelos.Raquelos. Posts: 7,734
    Forum Member
    Jefferson wrote: »
    This is different.

    But I'm not surprised so (relatively) few people have heard the news. The mainstream media have been very quiet about it - for now at least.

    You need to explain how it's different and provide some supporting evidence for me to give your claims any credence. Chuck few links our way :-)
  • Raquelos.Raquelos. Posts: 7,734
    Forum Member
    Jefferson wrote: »
    I haven't got any links but one or two others others must have heard about this?

    Heard about it where? The pub? Because tbh at my local they are all excited about the latest discovery of how to turn lead into gold and the unicorn colony discovered in a hill made of emeralds in Wales. No links for that either though, sorry
  • JeffersonJefferson Posts: 3,736
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Raquelos. wrote: »
    You need to explain how it's different and provide some supporting evidence for me to give your claims any credence. Chuck few links our way :-)

    It's down to the ever evolving sophisticated computer power and advances in robotics.
  • tealadytealady Posts: 26,263
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jefferson wrote: »
    I haven't got any links but one or two others others must have heard about this?
    yeah, I heard about it down the pub.

    How does AI emulate judgement?
    Let's take accountants - sure they have moved on from book ledgers and pens to spreadsheets/databases/large scale relational databases. How can you possibly conceive that AI can replace a Tax Accountant?
  • jonner101jonner101 Posts: 3,410
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Andrue wrote: »
    Meh. It's always been that way. It tends to create new jobs in equal numbers though - both in the specific area of advancement and in the ancillary jobs that support it. The only people who suffer are those incapable (usually actually unwilling) to retrain. As long as you are willing to adapt and willing to learn you usually do fine. In fact that's just good practice irregardless of progress.

    Unfortunately some people think that once they leave school (or higher education) that's it and they expect to spend the rest of their lives in the same job or at least the same career.

    Having written that though, one development that concerns me a little is in software development. There are signs that computers are approaching the point where they can program themselves. In a lot of areas it's gone from telling them what to do to just telling them what you want (or almost). Now personally I'm not fussed because I should be retired before that shitstorm hits but there's a wider concern. Given how central computers now are to our civilisation and even our culture the idea that they can program themselves better than we can is disturbing. Look up 'Singularity' on Wikipedia :-/


    We're no-where near that point, if anything the man power required in software development is getting higher as the tools become more powerful and hardware less costly so it now becomes feasible to do more systems for companies who previously could not have gained benefit. There is also the shift in some cases to mobile computing which is another boost to software development.

    If any one loses a job because of software development, it's nearly always because of some software improvement that enables a company to automate more of their processes and thus can run with less staff.
Sign In or Register to comment.