Judges Comments Not Relating To Actual Performances
cyrilsneer
Posts: 925 Forum Member
✭✭
They told Rachel she was great ..... the performance was awful
They told Kandy Rain they were awful ... they sounded ok.
Are the judges actually listening, or is it more they have an agenda who they want out each week and give comments accordingly, no matter what the peformance is like.
It was the same last year
They told Kandy Rain they were awful ... they sounded ok.
Are the judges actually listening, or is it more they have an agenda who they want out each week and give comments accordingly, no matter what the peformance is like.
It was the same last year
0
Comments
And I don't think anyone called Kandy Rain awful. They just focused on what they wore.
If they had a pop at her she may get the sympathy vote or fans voting extra. I believe they want her in the bottom two.
She could pose a threat. (I really like her by the way).
The Kandy Rain attack was probably to get girls to vote to save them to prove they are not all jealous or some other agenda, I have no idea on the tactic there.
I thought Ollie was poor but they focus on his likeability to get him through.
Rikki IMO was a lot better than Ollie (I am not a fan of either by the way).
Obviously a lot of what they say is scripted after rehearsals and to support who they want to lose and save.
Ignore them they all speak balls 99% of the time.:D
The one that really stood out for me was praising Lloyd who was every bit as woeful as John and Edward.