Jason Orange looks really poorly!

[Deleted User] · 13/12/10 - 12:57

Has anyone else noticed that in Take That's recent (and seemingly endless) recent TV appearances, Jason has looked awful? He's so skinny! I want to give the man a plate of chips. Seriously - he looks ill :-(
x

j24 · 13/12/10 - 13:09

still would! X

WhisperingGhost · 13/12/10 - 13:11

He's looked like that for years. I remember reading online rumours during their big reunion documentary (in 2005) that he had AIDS or something. Sick! I just think his young partying lifestyle has caught up with him.

Camino · 13/12/10 - 13:38

they all look so aged now, aah so sad

[Deleted User] · 13/12/10 - 13:47

And you never see him with a wife/girlfriend ;-)

[Deleted User] · 13/12/10 - 13:54

Camino wrote: »

they all look so aged now, aah so sad

:eek: They look absolutely fine. Do you think they should not have changed in 15 years?

edEx · 13/12/10 - 13:57

He imbibed himself with far too many substances and had far too many late nights during his youth. Shame, he was seriously handsome in his day.

Irvine wrote: »

And you never see him with a wife/girlfriend ;-)

Jason allegedly doesn't discriminate at all on that score. If what I've been told by those who knew him before fame he's always been a bit of a hedonist more than anything else

parthy · 13/12/10 - 14:19

WhisperingGhost wrote: »

I remember reading online rumours during their big reunion documentary (in 2005) that he had AIDS or something. Sick!

Having AIDS is sick? Nice to see some of the old, ignorant views on the illness still linger to this day. :rolleyes:

[Deleted User] · 13/12/10 - 14:27

parthy wrote: »

Having AIDS is sick? Nice to see some of the old, ignorant views on the illness still linger to this day. :rolleyes:

I think the poster meant that rumours like that are sick if they're just made up. Same as it would be sick to spread that someone has any other disease when they don't.

WhisperingGhost · 13/12/10 - 14:29

parthy wrote: »

Having AIDS is sick? Nice to see some of the old, ignorant views on the illness still linger to this day. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Excuse me, but don't you dare ever accuse me of being ignorant and saying that I think having AIDS is sick when you don't even know me, and didn't bother reading my original post properly!! I meant the insinuation that he had AIDS was sick just based on his appearance. I wold say the same if people were saying he looked like he had Cancer or any other life threatening illness. I take an HIV test every six months to make sure I'm healthy and 'clean', so I would hardly say I am 'ignorant' on the subject. I'll await your apology, but going by how quickly you were to jump to your initial conclusion I wont hold my breath!

Sallyforth · 13/12/10 - 14:29

And clearly NOT in the way that "sick" is now used ironcially by "yoof" to mean something brilliant.

WhisperingGhost · 13/12/10 - 14:30

Blamhappy2 wrote: »

I think the poster meant that rumours like that are sick if they're just made up. Same as it would be sick to spread that someone has any other disease when they don't.

Exactly what I meant. Thank you

Camino · 13/12/10 - 14:33

wonkeydonkey wrote: »

:eek: They look absolutely fine. Do you think they should not have changed in 15 years?

not as much as they have, dem is ugly now

parthy · 13/12/10 - 14:45

Blamhappy2 wrote: »

I think the poster meant that rumours like that are sick if they're just made up. Same as it would be sick to spread that someone has any other disease when they don't.

WhisperingGhost wrote: »

Excuse me, but don't you dare ever accuse me of being ignorant and saying that I think having AIDS is sick when you don't even know me, and didn't bother reading my original post properly!! I meant the insinuation that he had AIDS was sick just based on his appearance. I wold say the same if people were saying he looked like he had Cancer or any other life threatening illness. I take an HIV test every six months to make sure I'm healthy and 'clean', so I would hardly say I am 'ignorant' on the subject. I'll await your apology, but going by how quickly you were to jump to your initial conclusion I wont hold my breath!

Ah, my mistake. Sorry!

Viridiana · 13/12/10 - 14:45

Well they looks too old to be in a boy band. I was a teen when they were actually a BOY band and i can say I find it a bit sad that they didn't moved on.

parthy · 13/12/10 - 14:46

Sallyforth wrote: »

And clearly NOT in the way that "sick" is now used ironcially by "yoof" to mean something brilliant.

I'm not part of the "yoof" demographic anymore, sadly.

parthy · 13/12/10 - 14:48

Viridiana wrote: »

Well they looks too old to be in a boy band. I was a teen when they were actually a BOY band and i can say I find it a bit sad that they didn't moved on.

The reason for them not moving on? Filthy lucre.

edEx · 13/12/10 - 14:48

Viridiana wrote: »

Well they looks too old to be in a boy band. I was a teen when they were actually a BOY band and i can say I find it a bit sad that they didn't moved on.

They have moved on IMO. The music now is different, more mature and reflective in tone.

As for how they look, I don't see what the problem is. They're only in their 30s. Hardly knocking on death's door.

WhisperingGhost · 13/12/10 - 14:49

parthy wrote: »

Ah, my mistake. Sorry!

Appreciate your apology. Thanks.

LisaB599 · 13/12/10 - 14:50

I thought this myself watching him on Strictly, is he ill anyone know?

Sloopy · 13/12/10 - 14:51

I thought he looked OK.

When they first started out in Take That they were barely out of their teens. They're now blokes in their late 30s/early 40s. It's called getting older.

[Deleted User] · 13/12/10 - 14:53

edEx wrote: »

They have moved on IMO. The music now is different, more mature and reflective in tone.

As for how they look, I don't see what the problem is. They're only in their 30s. Hardly knocking on death's door.

Just nit picking but two are over 40 (same as me), one is heading that way. And I agree they have moved on, much better this time round

[Deleted User] · 13/12/10 - 15:04

Camino wrote: »

not as much as they have, dem is ugly now

Snort. That must be why M & S signed them up for a massive Billboard modelling campaign.

[Deleted User] · 13/12/10 - 15:05

Hmmmm. What I meant was that he looks really gaunt now - he didn't look like that a couple of years ago when they made their comeback as a 4 piece.
I honestly think that he looks like has an eating disorder. He doesnt look healthy at all :-(.

cavalli · 13/12/10 - 15:07

lennie_rw wrote: »

Hmmmm. What I meant was that he looks really gaunt now - he didn't look like that a couple of years ago when they made their comeback as a 4 piece.
I honestly think that he looks like has an eating disorder. He doesnt look healthy at all :-(.

Me and a friend were saying much the same thing at the weekend. Looks like something more than the natural aging process...shame because he was almost my favorite

Sallyforth · 13/12/10 - 15:10

A Google image search reminded me that he was quite gaunt in the face when he was younger. then seemed to fill out and has now slimmed down again.

Hey there!

Quick Links

Jason Orange looks really poorly!

Comments