The Ratings Thread (Part 60)

1248249251253254351

Comments

  • Mike TeeveeMike Teevee Posts: 35,573
    Forum Member
    BBC1
    4757
    5367
    6219
    8330
    12322
    13583
    14298
    13870
    14947
    15544
    15721
    15861
    16110
    16064
    15072
    10692
    8768

    ITV (longer running time I think)
    1326
    1230
    1388
    1636
    2427
    2763
    2979
    2591
    2592
    2810
    2897
    2849
    2911
    2879
    2752
    1920
    1431
    771
    ITV HD
    213
    281
    345
    374
    636
    747
    786
    662
    760
    846
    879
    798
    737
    788
    714
    486
    350
    196

    :)
  • kwynne42kwynne42 Posts: 75,337
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    cylon6 wrote: »
    I didn't expect a higher figure than that because of good weather in the early evening. People were watching at pubs in beer gardens or outdoors.

    Would BARB viewers who were watching their TV's outside not count or do you have watch in a set room to be counted.
  • F1KenF1Ken Posts: 4,229
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    KennyT wrote: »
    We've already established that their peak came at 90mins - keep up :D

    K

    :D

    Oh, only this thread!
  • F1KenF1Ken Posts: 4,229
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    As Mike Teevee said, ITV ran for 10 minutes longer than the BBC coverage.
  • cylon6cylon6 Posts: 25,486
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    A stat from Samuel.

    "BBC beat ITV by 4.2 to 1 yesterday. This is ITV's smallest margin of defeat for World Cup final since 1998!"
  • F1KenF1Ken Posts: 4,229
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    cylon6 wrote: »
    A stat from Samuel.

    "BBC beat ITV by 4.2 to 1 yesterday. This is ITV's smallest margin of defeat for World Cup final since 1998!"

    Oh dear! He's wet himself in despair . "Mother Fetch the Kleenex, I've done it again!"
  • H of De VilH of De Vil Posts: 26,539
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Its a wonder anyone watches ITV at all. The unpopular Adrian Chiles on ITV and the ad free BBC on the other side. The BBC is already one step ahead on ITV.

    However despite only getting 2.9m I bet nothing else would have got higher than that if ITV didn't simulcast the final. I imagine they still made a profit.
  • MarkynottsMarkynotts Posts: 5,255
    Forum Member
    Its a wonder anyone watches ITV at all. The unpopular Adrian Chiles on ITV and the ad free BBC on the other side. The BBC is already one step ahead on ITV.

    However despite only getting 2.9m I bet nothing else would have got higher than that if ITV didn't simulcast the final. I imagine they still made a profit.

    I think for either broadcaster not to show the final would have been strange. Imagine ITV or the BBC turning around after the semi's and saying "thats all from us, we will be back in four years"

    Unless something comes along later in the year, I think we can safely say that the World Cup is going to top the charts for the end of the year (well depending upon the NYE fireworks of course)
  • KennyTKennyT Posts: 20,701
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    cylon6 wrote: »
    A stat from Samuel.

    "BBC beat ITV by 4.2 to 1 yesterday. This is ITV's smallest margin of defeat for World Cup final since 1998!"
    it's a fake quote! The "real" Samuel would never use capitals for "itv"!!! :D

    K
  • Stefano92Stefano92 Posts: 66,393
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    9pm:

    World Cup- 12.09m (BBC1)
    World Cup- 2.82m (ITV)
    Titanic- 971k (C4)
    Big Brother- 920k (C5)
    The Night Watch- 853k (BBC2)

    All include +1. Not as bad as I thought to be fair for everyone else.
  • cylon6cylon6 Posts: 25,486
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    KennyT wrote: »
    it's a fake quote! The "real" Samuel would never use capitals for "itv"!!! :D

    K

    He didn't. I corrected that. :D
  • F1KenF1Ken Posts: 4,229
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    cylon6 wrote: »
    He didn't. I corrected that. :D

    I never understood the "itv" thing. It's not correct to write "itv". It's nearly as bad as $ky, it should off course be £ky because I have never seen the US dollar used as currency in the UK.

    Oh Samuel, the only forum member who worsened my mental state, a feat matched only by my wife!
  • ChrisEChrisE Posts: 1,877
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    F1Ken wrote: »
    I never understood the "itv" thing. It's not correct to write "itv". It's nearly as bad as $ky, it should off course be £ky because I have never seen the US dollar used as currency in the UK.

    Oh Samuel, the only forum member who worsened my mental state, a feat matched only by my wife!

    I don't understand why itv in wrong, they rebranded themselves as itv some time ago.

    http://www.itv.com/presscentre/

    Is it just another case of 'forum knicker twisting', I think either 'itv' or 'ITV' is acceptable.:)
  • hyperstarspongehyperstarsponge Posts: 16,662
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I assume when Germany scored the goal was the peak of the night.
  • BigOrangeBigOrange Posts: 59,672
    Forum Member
    Great finale. I thought it may come in slightly higher but nevertheless that's still 15M viewers over 4+ hours. Interesting that the BBC's margin of victory wasn't on quite the same level as it normally is, albeit still thoroughly convincing.
    KennyT wrote: »
    People switching away from itv at the ad break and not coming back?

    K
    I think so Kenny. You can't blame itv but it's really not an appropriate time to take a break. Those moments prior to the restart really add something to the coverage in terms of underlining the whole atmosphere of the occasion. I understand why many viewers would have turned over at that point.
  • BelligerenceBelligerence Posts: 40,613
    Forum Member
    MattN wrote: »
    Last night's game was the most watched program in Germany history according to the BBC ;


    A record 34.65m Germans watched Sunday's World Cup final win on national television.
    It beat the previous record of 32.57m set by the semi-final between Germany and Brazil.
    The number, which does not include the many millions who watched the match in bars and open-air public viewings, represents a market share of 86.3%, according to broadcast data figures.
    Amazing.
  • BigOrangeBigOrange Posts: 59,672
    Forum Member
    MattN wrote: »
    A record 34.65m Germans watched Sunday's World Cup final win on national television.
    It beat the previous record of 32.57m set by the semi-final between Germany and Brazil.
    The number, which does not include the many millions who watched the match in bars and open-air public viewings, represents a market share of 86.3%, according to broadcast data figures.
    Wow! :cool:
    cylon6 wrote: »
    A stat from Samuel.

    "BBC beat ITV by 4.2 to 1 yesterday. This is ITV's smallest margin of defeat for World Cup final since 1998!"
    Thanks cylon6. I'm going to be worrying about Samuel's cat all day now.
    Its a wonder anyone watches ITV at all. The unpopular Adrian Chiles on ITV and the ad free BBC on the other side. The BBC is already one step ahead on ITV.
    It's not as if the itv broadcast was overloaded with adverts. Or that the BBC's coverage was immune from criticism. The likes of Lawro for example isn't everyone's idea of a great co-commentator. I find him to be an immeasurably better pundit than co-commentator.
    However despite only getting 2.9m I bet nothing else would have got higher than that if ITV didn't simulcast the final. I imagine they still made a profit.
    For sure they wouldn't have rated anywhere near as well otherwise. The chance to advertise during a big event like the World Cup final with the likely demos is a very attractive opportunity that doesn't come along very often.
    ChrisE wrote: »
    I don't understand why itv in wrong, they rebranded themselves as itv some time ago.

    http://www.itv.com/presscentre/

    Is it just another case of 'forum knicker twisting', I think either 'itv' or 'ITV' is acceptable.:)
    Well exactly. It's hardly being derogatory. Personally don't like that it was rebranded to itv and feel it looks poor on air, but for the sake of forum debate it's really not an issue.
  • Stefano92Stefano92 Posts: 66,393
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Tonight will be interesting, I wonder how many shows and channels will recover due to the end of the World Cup.

    Utopia starts on CH4 at 10pm and people are expecting it to do very well, but didn't is barely get 1m for it's premiere last year?
  • jlp95bwfcjlp95bwfc Posts: 18,351
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Of course you're all forgetting that Samuel used Itv, not ITV or itv.
  • ChrisEChrisE Posts: 1,877
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jlp95bwfc wrote: »
    Of course you're all forgetting that Samuel used Itv, not ITV or itv.

    I am scandalised.:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:D
  • BigOrangeBigOrange Posts: 59,672
    Forum Member
    Salv* wrote: »
    Tonight will be interesting, I wonder how many shows and channels will recover due to the end of the World Cup.

    Utopia starts on CH4 at 10pm and people are expecting it to do very well, but didn't is barely get 1m for it's premiere last year?
    Utopia is capable of rating well to a point but BB won't be worried about going up against it. Very different audiences generally speaking. If C4 was airing a young skewing documentary or Made in Chelsea was on E4, there would be more to be concerned about from BB's perspective.

    I don't really know how tonight is going to go down ratings wise. It could be quiet by Monday's usual standards. The high of a big event like the World Cup final might make typical summer offerings look rather mundane by comparison. And it's not as if the soaps can be counted on to get bums on seats these days.
  • Stefano92Stefano92 Posts: 66,393
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Dancc wrote: »
    Utopia is capable of rating well to a point but BB won't be worried about going up against it. Very different audiences generally speaking. If C4 was airing a young skewing documentary or Made in Chelsea was on E4, there would be more to be concerned about from BB's perspective.

    I don't really know how tonight is going to go down ratings wise. It could be quiet by Monday's usual standards. The high of a big event like the World Cup final might make typical summer offerings look rather mundane by comparison. And it's not as if the soaps can be counted on to get bums on seats these days.

    I reckon it will be a very quiet day. Soaps will remain the same.

    Utopia at 1.2m, BB at 1.3-1.4m. The most impressive rating may come from Benefits Britain again on CH5.
  • KarlHydeKarlHyde Posts: 1,830
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    International World Cup ratings:

    United Kingdom: BBC1 12.09m (50.3%), ITV 2.86m (12.1%)
    Germany: ARD 34.65m (86.3%) - new all-time record
    France: TF1 13.583m (61.3%) + BeIN Sports (unknown)
    Italy: RAI1 13.952m (56.71%)
    Spain: Telecinco 10.693m (64.9%) first 90 minutes; 12.691m (67.6%) extra time
    Netherlands: Ned1 5.937m (74.6%)
    Austria: ORF1 1.7m (54%) + ARD 0.5m

    This is a combined total of almost 96 million viewers in 7 countries.

    Can anyone provide figures for other countries?
  • BigOrangeBigOrange Posts: 59,672
    Forum Member
    Salv* wrote: »
    I reckon it will be a very quiet day. Soaps will remain the same.

    Utopia at 1.2m, BB at 1.3-1.4m. The most impressive rating may come from Benefits Britain again on CH5.
    Documentary v documentary v documentary v documentary v documentary tonight at 9PM. Such variety on the major channels. ;)

    I don't think Benefits Britain will rate as impressively this week with the above in mind. It could lose as many as 600,000 viewers I think. Long Lost Family is a very solid rater for itv and C4's Royal Marines documentary looks worth a watch. Bit different to last week when the commercial opposition was a low rated gameshow and a low rated documentary.
  • D.M.N.D.M.N. Posts: 34,171
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    From Mike's breakdowns....

    19:00 - 4.76m vs 1.54m
    19:15 - 5.37m vs 1.51m
    19:30 - 6.22m vs 1.73m
    19:45 - 8.33m vs 2.01m
    20:00 - 12.32m vs 3.06m
    20:15 - 13.58m vs 3.51m
    20:30 - 14.30m vs 3.77m
    20:45 - 13.87m vs 3.25m
    21:00 - 14.95m vs 3.35m
    21:15 - 15.54m vs 3.66m
    21:30 - 15.72m vs 3.78m
    21:45 - 15.86m vs 3.65m
    22:00 - 16.11m vs 3.65m
    22:15 - 16.06m vs 3.67m
    22:30 - 15.07m vs 3.47m
    22:45 - 10.69m vs 2.41m
    23:00 - 8.77m vs 1.78m
    23:15 -
    vs 1.12m
This discussion has been closed.