UK GDP per capita compared to our comparators

SirMickTravisSirMickTravis Posts: 2,607
Forum Member
✭✭✭
Who would be our comparators? I'm thinking of the leading European and English speaking economies. I was surprised how badly we fare. Our poor performance is masked by the fact that we had a pretty deep recession to recover from and a faster growing population than most of Europe. These are PPP figures from the CIA, which you can argue about being the best but what they do is mean that currency fluctuation won't confuse the picture.

Switzerland - 55200
USA - 54800
Netherlands - 47400
Australia - 46600
Austria - 45400
Sweden - 44700
Germany - 44700
Canada - 44500
Denmark - 44300
Belgium - 41700
Finland - 40500
France 40400
UK - 37700

I've left out Norway which is beyond the scale due to oil wealth. I'm not sure what we can do but when you consider how much London pushes up the average we really are well back. It's safe to say Italy has now been relegated from the top table. Will the UK soon follow suit?
«1

Comments

  • i am godi am god Posts: 733
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    another sad attempt by the dead left
  • HildaonplutoHildaonpluto Posts: 37,697
    Forum Member
    i am god wrote: »
    another sad attempt by the dead left

    Actually Andrew Neil from the Daily Politics who is definitely not from or of the left was raising the issue of GDP PER CAPITA before the general election.

    It's a valid issue if rises in national GDP don't really benefit the average INDIVIDUAL as much in the UK as it does in comparable developed countries.
  • SirMickTravisSirMickTravis Posts: 2,607
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Actually Andrew Neil from the Daily Politics who is definitely not from or of the left was raising the issue of GDP PER CAPITA before the general election.

    It's a valid issue if rises in national GDP don't really benefit the average INDIVIDUAL as much in the UK as it does in comparable developed countries.

    Indeed. Governments of both left and right have focussed on total growth rather than per capita. This masks the fact that although there has been a lot of immigration contributing to more growth overall, per capita incomes have not been rising that fast.
  • NeverEnoughNeverEnough Posts: 3,052
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So the ultra capitalist USA and the secretive bankers of Switzerland rank higher than the welfare paradises of Sweden and Denmark. Interesting,

    Lessons to be learned.
  • AndyCopenAndyCopen Posts: 2,213
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Better give people non jobs in the public sector counting green pencils , that will soon boost the statistics
  • Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So the ultra capitalist USA and the secretive bankers of Switzerland rank higher than the welfare paradises of Sweden and Denmark. Interesting,

    Lessons to be learned.
    The main lesson is never to trust averages.
    i am god wrote: »
    another sad attempt by the dead left
    It's been a matter of concern for a number of years, that the recovery isn't increasing productivity.
  • paulschapmanpaulschapman Posts: 35,536
    Forum Member
    i am god wrote: »
    another sad attempt by the dead left

    Actually it is not and this is one of the reasons why wages are not growing faster and one of the reasons why the growth forecast was downgraded. Productivity in this country is poor and it needs to change. The left may not like it since one way is to reduce regulation or at least make compliance a lot easier.
  • rjb101rjb101 Posts: 2,689
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Actually it is not and this is one of the reasons why wages are not growing faster and one of the reasons why the growth forecast was downgraded. Productivity in this country is poor and it needs to change. The left may not like it since one way is to reduce regulation or at least make compliance a lot easier.

    lack of investment by poor management, poor infrastructure, too much part time working, lack of training are a few more reasons I could think of.
  • trunkstertrunkster Posts: 14,468
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    rjb101 wrote: »
    lack of investment by poor management, poor infrastructure, too much part time working, lack of training are a few more reasons I could think of.

    Masses of cheap imported labour driving down wages/incomes so paying less tax but using the same level if not more resources.
  • rjb101rjb101 Posts: 2,689
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    trunkster wrote: »
    Masses of cheap imported labour driving down wages/incomes so paying less tax but using the same level if not more resources.

    Getting people to do the same job for less increases productivity, but productivity is still piss poor after all these years. Time to look elsewhere for a reason.
  • andyknandykn Posts: 66,849
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Actually it is not and this is one of the reasons why wages are not growing faster and one of the reasons why the growth forecast was downgraded. Productivity in this country is poor and it needs to change. The left may not like it since one way is to reduce regulation or at least make compliance a lot easier.

    They've had 5 years to give it a go and don't seem to have got very far.

    And most of the countries above us are subject to very similar regulation, moving in Somalia's direction is not the way to go IMHO.
  • NeverEnoughNeverEnough Posts: 3,052
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Ethel_Fred wrote: »
    The main lesson is never to trust averages.
    .

    Why? Either GDP per capita is a significant statistic or it's not. If it is than Switzerland and the USA are top of that list and therefore we should seek to emulate then (why should the UK settle for anything less than top spot?).

    If it's not then what is the purpose of this thread, other than yet another selective use of statistics by a left leaning member to suggest that the economy isn't doing well?
  • Rastus PiefaceRastus Pieface Posts: 4,382
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    rjb101 wrote: »
    Getting people to do the same job for less increases productivity, but productivity is still piss poor after all these years. Time to look elsewhere for a reason.

    perhaps it's a lack of motivation. would you produce more for piss poor wages?
  • paulschapmanpaulschapman Posts: 35,536
    Forum Member
    rjb101 wrote: »
    lack of investment by poor management, poor infrastructure, too much part time working, lack of training are a few more reasons I could think of.

    Companies have cut investment rather than making people unemployed. Training is poor because we have allowed schemes such as Intra-Company-Transfers and the shortage occupations list to replace actually training workers.
    andykn wrote:
    They've had 5 years to give it a go and don't seem to have got very far.

    And most of the countries above us are subject to very similar regulation, moving in Somalia's direction is not the way to go IMHO.

    At the risk of starting another interminable thread that the last Labour administration were totally blameless for what happened under their watch, much of the coalition government was spent getting the deficit down. It was one of the more left wing members of the coalition government who was the biggest supporters of ICTs - but then he had the good grace to lose his seat.

    We should also make a proper attempt to ensure that regulation is appropriate for a modern economy.
  • BrokenArrowBrokenArrow Posts: 21,665
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    This is what happens when you import millions of non-productive migrants, duh !
  • PrestonAlPrestonAl Posts: 10,342
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Per capita is no better than the standard gdp figure. They all have positives and negatives that can be spun.
  • jjnejjne Posts: 6,580
    Forum Member
    This is what happens when you import millions of non-productive migrants, duh !

    Because the other countries of the EU don't have exactly the same 'problem'...
  • Rastus PiefaceRastus Pieface Posts: 4,382
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jjne wrote: »
    Because the other countries of the EU don't have exactly the same 'problem'...

    some do. some don't.
    do you think romania is importing millions of workers?
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,772
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So the ultra capitalist USA and the secretive bankers of Switzerland rank higher than the welfare paradises of Sweden and Denmark. Interesting,

    Lessons to be learned.

    Yes, and that lesson is that statistics can be distorted by extreme results at both the top and the bottom of the scale.
  • David TeeDavid Tee Posts: 22,833
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The damage was all done between 2007 and 2009 when the UK's GDP per capita number fell by 23.3%. Out of the top 100 global economies, only Iceland (-41.5%) and the UAE (-26.3%) were worse than the UK. Over the same period comparable figures for EU economies were Germany (-0.2%), (France +0.1%), Italy (-1.9%), Spain (-1.2%).

    From 2009 until 2013 (the last year for the comparable figures), the UK has been performing better, growing GDP per capita by 12.7%. This compares to Germany (11.0%), France (2.2%), Italy (-3.5%) and Spain (-5.7%)

    So - we're on the way back but there's a long way still to go. The problem is that on this measure. the UK took a gigantic fall 6 to 8 years ago.

    Source
  • jjnejjne Posts: 6,580
    Forum Member
    some do. some don't.
    do you think romania is importing millions of workers?

    Oh dear.

    Germany certainly are. And France. And they're both ahead of us.

    Next fruitcake theory please.
  • andyknandykn Posts: 66,849
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    At the risk of starting another interminable thread that the last Labour administration were totally blameless for what happened under their watch, much of the coalition government was spent getting the deficit down.

    It's not about how much the Labour administration were to blame or but how much Labour were blamed for that the next two administrations are continuing.

    And you've not been able at all to address the point that most of the countries that do better than us are subject to similar regulation as us, preferring to start an interminable thread on the supposed failings of Labour, which have been continued by the Tories anyway.
  • Rastus PiefaceRastus Pieface Posts: 4,382
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jjne wrote: »
    Oh dear.

    Germany certainly are. And France. And they're both ahead of us.

    Next fruitcake theory please.

    we are predicted to overtake the french economy this year (or next year - can't remember which). as for germany, they will always have a strong economy, thanks to tying the value of the euro to the mark, which made their exports very competitive.

    next fruitcake reply please.:D
  • rjb101rjb101 Posts: 2,689
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    perhaps it's a lack of motivation. would you produce more for piss poor wages?

    Not really lack of motivation. Productivity isn't how hard you work all day it's what gets done when your working, working smarter if you like. If you don't have tools to do the job properly, if it takes you hours to visit a customer because the roads are gridlocked or if the trains are delayed.

    You don't see the Germans busting a gut, but they're much more productive than we are and have even more immigration than we do.
  • paulschapmanpaulschapman Posts: 35,536
    Forum Member
    rjb101 wrote: »
    Not really lack of motivation. Productivity isn't how hard you work all day it's what gets done when your working, working smarter if you like. If you don't have tools to do the job properly, if it takes you hours to visit a customer because the roads are gridlocked or if the trains are delayed.

    You don't see the Germans busting a gut, but they're much more productive than we are and have even more immigration than we do.

    Low Pay has been linked to lower productivity.

    http://pwc.blogs.com/economics_in_business/2014/04/pay-and-productivity-an-economic-perspective.html
Sign In or Register to comment.