Obviously that 'protestor' was either allowed in on purpose or he was employed (by the secret services) to do what he did. As Leveson said himself, it was a secure corridor and there's no way any old Joe Public would get that close to Tony Blair without the approval of all his bodyguards and secret police etc.
This is a stunt that will take the headlines away from Blair's actual evidence in the court. No doubt the majority of sheeple will still fall for it though.
Obviously that 'protestor' was either allowed in on purpose or he was employed (by the secret services) to do what he did. As Leveson said himself, it was a secure corridor and there's no way any old Joe Public would get that close to Tony Blair without the approval of all his bodyguards and secret police etc.
This is a stunt that will take the headlines away from Blair's actual evidence in the court. No doubt the majority of sheeple will still fall for it though.
I didn't find it funny, like him or loathe him ( and I cannot stand the man ) he is entitled like anyone else in any court to give his evidence in peace and in safety, and something is very wrong if that person was able to breach all security to get in and I for one am pleased that that situation will be looked into.
Obviously that 'protestor' was either allowed in on purpose or he was employed (by the secret services) to do what he did. As Leveson said himself, it was a secure corridor and there's no way any old Joe Public would get that close to Tony Blair without the approval of all his bodyguards and secret police etc.
This is a stunt that will take the headlines away from Blair's actual evidence in the court. No doubt the majority of sheeple will still fall for it though.
I agree, incidents only happen when TPTB want them to happen.
Funny how it's never a schizophrenic nutter maniacally firing a sawn-off shotgun hither and thither. The hecklers are always methodical and calculating and are more likely to wield a comedy meringue pie or a carefully prepared message.
A bit like how all subsequent terrorist threats after 9/11 and 7/7 have always been just mild enough to not actually kill anybody, but still attract almost the same amount of coverage as if lives had indeed been lost.
If you notice, Blair is looking at his accuser all the time. It's like he had it planned beforehand. I don't trust him at all.
Edit: I also notice how the first fella who got a hold of him waited until another fella was there with him. Was he purposefully giving the protester more time to shout? Hmm...
The protester is an idiot. He's probably a hypocrite too. If the authorities oppress him, he'll probably complain, yet he has spent years protesting against the removal of a dictator who oppressed a whole nation.
Leaving people to suffer tyranny is more criminals than liberating them from their tyrants. People like that protester who disagree should be deported to North Korea, and North Korea should be paid to treat them worse than North Koreans. When nobody comes to liberate them, they won't complain, but if they are liberated they will call the leaders of the countries that liberated them war criminals.
the film and TV professinoal was an assistant director on 27 episodes of Time Team alongside Tony Robinson, and a first assistant director on a 2010 Everest documentary entitled The Wildest Dream.
That's not very professional of the Daily Mail is it?
The protester is an idiot. He's probably a hypocrite too. If the authorities oppress him, he'll probably complain, yet he has spent years protesting against the removal of a dictator who oppressed a whole nation.
Leaving people to suffer tyranny is more criminals than liberating them from their tyrants. People like that protester who disagree should be deported to North Korea, and North Korea should be paid to treat them worse than North Koreans. When nobody comes to liberate them, they won't complain, but if they are liberated they will call the leaders of the countries that liberated them war criminals.
The war in Iraq was illegal, Blair should be standing trial at the Hague.
Mikael
Posts: 1,596
Comments
This is a stunt that will take the headlines away from Blair's actual evidence in the court. No doubt the majority of sheeple will still fall for it though.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2151016/Youre-war-criminal-Security-probe-protester-bursts-courtroom-Tony-Blair-gives-evidence-Leveson-inquiry.html
And so it begins...
I didn't find it funny, like him or loathe him ( and I cannot stand the man ) he is entitled like anyone else in any court to give his evidence in peace and in safety, and something is very wrong if that person was able to breach all security to get in and I for one am pleased that that situation will be looked into.
I agree, incidents only happen when TPTB want them to happen.
Funny how it's never a schizophrenic nutter maniacally firing a sawn-off shotgun hither and thither. The hecklers are always methodical and calculating and are more likely to wield a comedy meringue pie or a carefully prepared message.
A bit like how all subsequent terrorist threats after 9/11 and 7/7 have always been just mild enough to not actually kill anybody, but still attract almost the same amount of coverage as if lives had indeed been lost.
Chinny reckon.
If you notice, Blair is looking at his accuser all the time. It's like he had it planned beforehand. I don't trust him at all.
Edit: I also notice how the first fella who got a hold of him waited until another fella was there with him. Was he purposefully giving the protester more time to shout? Hmm...
Have you got your rose coloured spectacles on again?
I'm already tiring of your smart-Alec replies on every topic of this forum.
He's one of those blokes who the saying 'I'd like to punch' could have been written for
I used to like Tony Blair. Then I didnt. Now I don't give a hoot one way or another. He's old news.
Is it like an upper class laugh? Oh no thats "haw haw".
Sorry can't help then.
He did.
Leaving people to suffer tyranny is more criminals than liberating them from their tyrants. People like that protester who disagree should be deported to North Korea, and North Korea should be paid to treat them worse than North Koreans. When nobody comes to liberate them, they won't complain, but if they are liberated they will call the leaders of the countries that liberated them war criminals.
That's not very professional of the Daily Mail is it?
The war in Iraq was illegal, Blair should be standing trial at the Hague.
Yeah, just his voice and mannerisms were practically bringing me out in hives. How the hell did we cope when he was on telly all the time?