I think Claire sued Katie for things she said on the Graham Norton show? If I remember correctly the show did not air what Katie said. I am sure someone will remember more than me.
Uh oh if its the truth with what paper is saying she may land in trouble again
The GN show is pre-recorded, so the were able to cut the comment from the show before it was aired. However, KP made the comment in front of GN, the studio audience and people working on the show that day. Very stupid and it looks like she hasn't learned from that experience.
The GN show is pre-recorded, so the were able to cut the comment from the show before it was aired. However, KP made the comment in front of GN, the studio audience and people working on the show that day. Very stupid and it looks like she hasn't learned from that experience.
Katie implied that Pete and Claire were having an affair. Although the comments were not aired on tv, because the comment was made in front of a studio audience, crew etc, Claire was able to successfully sue Katie. Indeed Katie has not learned her lesson, and once again Katie will pay dearly. When will she ever learn? Maybe this is why Katie was on a downer last night on BB, she knows she's allowed her big mouth to run wild.
I don't think this is going to end well for Katie. Surely people are totally sick of her running them into the ground and revealing all their secrets, I doubt any of them have anything to lose at this stage why don't they bloody pull her up and put a stop to it?
The Daily Mail is reporting Jane is going to be sent into the CBB house! I really can't see this being true as she's kept such a low profile since the story broke...
The Daily Mail is reporting Jane is going to be sent into the CBB house! I really can't see this being true as she's kept such a low profile since the story broke...
This is just rehashed cr*p from the Daily Star, the same paper that said Katie had left though house last week due to her exploding boobs! No truth in this whatsoever
This is just rehashed cr*p from the Daily Star, the same paper that said Katie had left though house last week due to her exploding boobs! No truth in this whatsoever
Tbf,seeing a womans breasts explode on tv would have made pretty good viewing
What? No comments on the funding of Harvey's schooling?
I thought she or her mother would be doing the school run. Not a taxi service and a paid escort.
Why shouldn't Harvey, like thousands & thousands of children with disabilities, be taken to school in a taxi? Whether you like KP or not is totally irrelevant, Harvey is entitled to this service.
I agree, those benefits are not means tested for a reason. How KP funds the care of a severely disabled child is absolutely none of KH's business - shame on her.
I agree, those benefits are not means tested for a reason. How KP funds the care of a severely disabled child is absolutely none of KH's business - shame on her.
Agree, it is Harvey getting the benefits not KP. However, it does make you wonder why she didn't choose to move a little closer to his school, 4 hours a day in a taxi can't be very nice for him poor lad.
Harvey has a right to school transport the same as any other disabled child. It is down to the local authority to provide transport. If Katie Price wasn't such a good, caring Mum and put her son in residential care it would cost the authority hundreds of thousands per year so she is actually saving them a massive amount of money.
These specialist schools are not that common so there is nearly always a long distance to travel. In my county it is quite usual for disabled kids having to travel 3 or 4 hours a day to get to school.
I bet Katie Hopkins still collects child benefit for her kids just as every mother in the country is entitled to. ;-)
Harvey has a right to school transport the same as any other disabled child. It is down to the local authority to provide transport. If Katie Price wasn't such a good, caring Mum and put her son in residential care it would cost the authority hundreds of thousands per year so she is actually saving them a massive amount of money.
These specialist schools are not that common so there is nearly always a long distance to travel. In my county it is quite usual for disabled kids having to travel 3 or 4 hours a day to get to school.
I bet Katie Hopkins still collects child benefit for her kids just as every mother in the country is entitled to. ;-)
What? No comments on the funding of Harvey's schooling?
I thought she or her mother would be doing the school run. Not a taxi service and a paid escort.
She pays her taxes so is perfectly entitled to a taxpayer funded service. She chooses to keep Harvey at home with her andnot place him in residential care so in that sense she is helping him AND saving tonnes of money.
There are a trillion things to diss KP for - this is not one of them IMVHO.
Agree, it is Harvey getting the benefits not KP. However, it does make you wonder why she didn't choose to move a little closer to his school, 4 hours a day in a taxi can't be very nice for him poor lad.
Apparently, he was at a specialist school in Kent which was closed down and the next nearest suitable school is an hours drive from her home.
Whatever she is and she isn't, she did get together with families of other children with special needs in the area to try and get a free school opened but it was declined.
Agree, it is Harvey getting the benefits not KP. However, it does make you wonder why she didn't choose to move a little closer to his school, 4 hours a day in a taxi can't be very nice for him poor lad.
It doesn't make me wonder at all. Why does it make you wonder? Should she ignore the welfare of the rest of her family and their needs/schooling, and the close proximity to her mother who is a big part of Harvey's support system?
She pays her taxes so is perfectly entitled to a taxpayer funded service. She chooses to keep Harvey at home with her andnot place him in residential care so in that sense she is helping him AND saving tonnes of money.
There are a trillion things to diss KP for - this is not one of them IMVHO.
Absolutely Pru. There are so many valid reasons to have a dig at KP but the fact her son has a legal requirement to transport to take to him and from school really isn't one of them.
PA has allegedly banned CBB from his house out of concern at his kids hearing some of the things KP has been saying. Although I can't particularly imagine he would have had it playing in the first place given it features his estranged ex-wife and it starts too late for his kids to be watching anyway.
The pair of them are a mass of contradictions over what they think will and won't damage those poor kids.
PA has allegedly banned CBB from his house out of concern at his kids hearing some of the things KP has been saying. Although I can't particularly imagine he would have had it playing in the first place given it features his estranged ex-wife and it starts too late for his kids to be watching anyway.
The pair of them are a mass of contradictions over what they think will and won't damage those poor kids.
BiB, quite!
Is that one of the trash mags they both appear in regularly reporting that? I mean, it kinda goes without saying that the kids wouldn't be watching CBB. It's an adult themed programme which I would imagine almost all parents would, because of the content and also the time it airs, forbid their kids from watching.
Is that one of the trash mags they both appear in regularly reporting that? I mean, it kinda goes without saying that the kids wouldn't be watching CBB. It's an adult themed programme which I would imagine almost all parents would, because of the content and also the time it airs, forbid their kids from watching.
A load of rubbish Hmm,every silly celeb mag makes up stories about who said what and who did what,
unless it's a proper interview I never believe what they write,Closer is one of the worst imo along with Now and Reval and...well you get my drift ^_^
PA has allegedly banned CBB from his house out of concern at his kids hearing some of the things KP has been saying. Although I can't particularly imagine he would have had it playing in the first place given it features his estranged ex-wife and it starts too late for his kids to be watching anyway.
The pair of them are a mass of contradictions over what they think will and won't damage those poor kids.
The programme is on far too late for his children to be up watching no matter who appears on it. They should be in bed that time of night (unless they have appeared in one of his concerts!). BB would never be suitable for children the age of Princess and Junior so to mention its been banned just another way of PA getting something in the press *yawn*.
PA has allegedly banned CBB from his house out of concern at his kids hearing some of the things KP has been saying. Although I can't particularly imagine he would have had it playing in the first place given it features his estranged ex-wife and it starts too late for his kids to be watching anyway.
The pair of them are a mass of contradictions over what they think will and won't damage those poor kids.
Seeing as the start of the show states that it contains adult content, very bad language and aggressive conflict, any parent who did consider letting a primary age kid watch it needs their head testing
Comments
The GN show is pre-recorded, so the were able to cut the comment from the show before it was aired. However, KP made the comment in front of GN, the studio audience and people working on the show that day. Very stupid and it looks like she hasn't learned from that experience.
Katie implied that Pete and Claire were having an affair. Although the comments were not aired on tv, because the comment was made in front of a studio audience, crew etc, Claire was able to successfully sue Katie. Indeed Katie has not learned her lesson, and once again Katie will pay dearly. When will she ever learn? Maybe this is why Katie was on a downer last night on BB, she knows she's allowed her big mouth to run wild.
I thought she didn't know why Pete left her lol
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2924502/CBB-send-Katie-Price-s-ex-BFF-Jane-Pountney-slept-husband-Kieran-house.html#article-2924502
Just picked up a quote from that article:
She said: 'I f***ing got her by the head, pulled her off of the sunbed and started whacking her, saying "I f***ing knew it you f***ing w***e". Sl*t!
She knew it?
This is just rehashed cr*p from the Daily Star, the same paper that said Katie had left though house last week due to her exploding boobs! No truth in this whatsoever
Tbf,seeing a womans breasts explode on tv would have made pretty good viewing
I thought she or her mother would be doing the school run. Not a taxi service and a paid escort.
Why shouldn't Harvey, like thousands & thousands of children with disabilities, be taken to school in a taxi? Whether you like KP or not is totally irrelevant, Harvey is entitled to this service.
Agree, it is Harvey getting the benefits not KP. However, it does make you wonder why she didn't choose to move a little closer to his school, 4 hours a day in a taxi can't be very nice for him poor lad.
These specialist schools are not that common so there is nearly always a long distance to travel. In my county it is quite usual for disabled kids having to travel 3 or 4 hours a day to get to school.
I bet Katie Hopkins still collects child benefit for her kids just as every mother in the country is entitled to. ;-)
Not anymore if you earn over a certain amount
Correct, if you earn over 50k now you no longer are able to claim.
She pays her taxes so is perfectly entitled to a taxpayer funded service. She chooses to keep Harvey at home with her andnot place him in residential care so in that sense she is helping him AND saving tonnes of money.
There are a trillion things to diss KP for - this is not one of them IMVHO.
Apparently, he was at a specialist school in Kent which was closed down and the next nearest suitable school is an hours drive from her home.
Whatever she is and she isn't, she did get together with families of other children with special needs in the area to try and get a free school opened but it was declined.
Well thanks for that .... I stand corrected! How did I miss this?
So easy to judge when it's not your reality.
Absolutely Pru. There are so many valid reasons to have a dig at KP but the fact her son has a legal requirement to transport to take to him and from school really isn't one of them.
The pair of them are a mass of contradictions over what they think will and won't damage those poor kids.
BiB, quite!
Is that one of the trash mags they both appear in regularly reporting that? I mean, it kinda goes without saying that the kids wouldn't be watching CBB. It's an adult themed programme which I would imagine almost all parents would, because of the content and also the time it airs, forbid their kids from watching.
A load of rubbish Hmm,every silly celeb mag makes up stories about who said what and who did what,
unless it's a proper interview I never believe what they write,Closer is one of the worst imo along with Now and Reval and...well you get my drift ^_^
The programme is on far too late for his children to be up watching no matter who appears on it. They should be in bed that time of night (unless they have appeared in one of his concerts!). BB would never be suitable for children the age of Princess and Junior so to mention its been banned just another way of PA getting something in the press *yawn*.
Seeing as the start of the show states that it contains adult content, very bad language and aggressive conflict, any parent who did consider letting a primary age kid watch it needs their head testing