I actually thought it was quite a good edition tonight. It stayed more on a debate level rather than the ranting and raving or the bear baiting traps that usually ensue.
I actually thought it was quite a good edition tonight. It stayed more on a debate level rather than the ranting and raving or the bear baiting traps that usually ensue.
The BBC have gathered all the left thinking people in clacton and thrown them in the audience. When will the working class white people in Clacton be allowed a voice?
The BBC have gathered all the left thinking people in clacton and thrown them in the audience. When will the working class white people in Clacton be allowed a voice?
We saw all the audience arrive. The vast majority could not find Essex, let alone Clacton, let alone Clacton High. School. And we wonder when the lower class will be heard? Well they won't by Heard by the state/national broadcaster that's for sure...
We saw all the audience arrive. The vast majority could not find Essex, let alone Clacton, let alone Clacton High. School. And we wonder when the lower class will be heard? Well they won't by Heard by the state/national broadcaster that's for sure...
You would have thought a UKIP member wasn't getting elected. Utterly ridiculous and biased beyond belief. The BBC are a disgrace, paedophile protesters and biased.
The BBC have gathered all the left thinking people in clacton and thrown them in the audience. When will the working class white people in Clacton be allowed a voice?
Haven't they just had one? There was a vote for an MP there yesterday, in case you hadn't noticed!
And I doubt that all the "left thinking people" in Clacton would fit in that hall.
You would have thought a UKIP member wasn't getting elected. Utterly ridiculous and biased beyond belief. The BBC are a disgrace, paedophile protesters and biased.
There's no evidence of bias, and what is a "paedophile protester"?
We saw all the audience arrive. The vast majority could not find Essex, let alone Clacton, let alone Clacton High. School. And we wonder when the lower class will be heard? Well they won't by Heard by the state/national broadcaster that's for sure...
The BBC cannot force the "lower class" as you call them, or anyone else to come to a political discussion. If people don't apply, their voice won't be heard.
The BBC cannot force the "lower class" as you call them, or anyone else to come to a political discussion. If people don't apply, their voice won't be heard.
So it's not and never is truly representative, thanks for confirming.
The BBC cannot force the "lower class" as you call them, or anyone else to come to a political discussion. If people don't apply, their voice won't be heard.
Every single news report out of Clacton before the election showed that there was huge interest in the town, packed public meetings etc. You're not going to get me to believe that only 2 or 3 of the 1000+ people who went to an election rally on 24 September, for example, would turn up to be on TV.
Comments
Thought the panel were pretty bad TBF.
Patrick O'Flynn might be knowledgable but not necessarily intelligent. There is a difference.
Slight improvement on last week.
I think he's the only person who likes Milliband
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/the-week-in-higher-education/419599.article
(The study was done with Swedish footballers...)
We saw all the audience arrive. The vast majority could not find Essex, let alone Clacton, let alone Clacton High. School. And we wonder when the lower class will be heard? Well they won't by Heard by the state/national broadcaster that's for sure...
Only watched half the programme but I thought that Eric Pickles gave the poorest performance I've ever seen him give.
Breaking and Entering?
Haven't they just had one? There was a vote for an MP there yesterday, in case you hadn't noticed!
And I doubt that all the "left thinking people" in Clacton would fit in that hall.
There's no evidence of bias, and what is a "paedophile protester"?
The BBC cannot force the "lower class" as you call them, or anyone else to come to a political discussion. If people don't apply, their voice won't be heard.
So it's not and never is truly representative, thanks for confirming.
It's representative of those who are interested in politics and who choose to apply. It could never be anything else.
I don't think you can blame the BBC for the QT audience being - in your view - "ridiculous" or "out of touch".
As I've said the left are more politcally active in gaining access to such programs , I doesn't mean they are right.
I wouldn't call the BBC or Question time representative of anything, er, except the left.
Every single news report out of Clacton before the election showed that there was huge interest in the town, packed public meetings etc. You're not going to get me to believe that only 2 or 3 of the 1000+ people who went to an election rally on 24 September, for example, would turn up to be on TV.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/24/Farage-and-clacton-in-1000-people-rally
LOL to perceived unbiased BBC.
Eh? How does this make the BBC biased?