Options
Teenage Footballer makes sick comments about Steven Gerrard's daughter
darkjedimaster
Posts: 18,621 Forum Member
✭✭
The Rochdale youth player posted the vile remarks under an online snap of the Liverpool captain with his youngest girl Lourdes.
Reds ace Gerrard captioned the Instagram picture: “My World.”
But the young footballer then wrote: “I’d bang your girl Stevie.”
The comment provoked uproar from fans who branded the youth – a rising star tipped for the top – a paedophile.
Source
I don't care if he is a teenager, he should be named / shamed & banned from ever playing for a club again.
Reds ace Gerrard captioned the Instagram picture: “My World.”
But the young footballer then wrote: “I’d bang your girl Stevie.”
The comment provoked uproar from fans who branded the youth – a rising star tipped for the top – a paedophile.
Source
I don't care if he is a teenager, he should be named / shamed & banned from ever playing for a club again.
0
Comments
Yeah I did think of that, and he might say he meant that in his defence.
Like this don't happen every minute of every day.
Let's stone him
What a bunch of nonsense.
He would be the first one to complain if some reporter snapped a picture of his children and published it yet then turns around and places the picture which can be seen by as many people as most papers have sales and allows idiots to comment on.
Very different from posting the picture on the Internet.
If you are going to do that the security settings should be on maximum and not for anyone to see them.
Why??? Why in hell is it always the perving idiots that win in these cases? No, they should be the ones put under control (lock and key if I had my way), it's revolting that normal people can't do normal things because of them. Freedom of speech etc? My a*se!
Is it normal to share photos of young children with millions of people? Is it normal to go around showing pictures of your children to total strangers?
The real point here is 'Why shouldn't it be?' The royal family are always in the media with their kids, and no unseemly comments appear to be made. Children and babies appear on Facebook & You Tube daily with seldom an evil word said. So what is the difference, and I still beg the answer to the question - Why are we letting the pervs and morons win? Because that's what we appear to be doing by 'telling' famous people to hide their kids from view.
Famous people hid their kids from view all the time. Many have sued the press for publishing such photo's
Their are very strict rules regarding photos of children in the public domain for a reason. That's just common sense.
What is the reasoning and purpose behind allowing people to comment on these photos?
Winning and losing is just nonsense. The world is no different today because some random put a picture on a website. Nobody has won or lost by doing it. It's a pointless activity
You would think so, but am not too sure that he was referring to Alex as the photo in which the comment was made, didn't include her, was just Steven and his daughter.
It's way beyond 'something stupid'. The child he joked about banging is three years old FFS, sick doesn't even start to describe it - and I am as far from being a Gerrard fan as you can get.
LOL. Agree.